[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 12:48:21 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > I would like to see all of them fixed, p_group_cohomology especially, but > I think we are coming up on a release and if the package doesn't build on > supported platforms, we can't really call it optional. Once a package

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022, 20:48 John H Palmieri, wrote: > I would like to see all of them fixed, p_group_cohomology especially, > there is a regression to solve with the package, which needs understanding of the algorithm behind. (build problems are solved, I think). but I think we are coming up

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread John H Palmieri
I would like to see all of them fixed, p_group_cohomology especially, but I think we are coming up on a release and if the package doesn't build on supported platforms, we can't really call it optional. Once a package is fixed, then it should immediately get promoted back to optional again.

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread Marc Culler
Incidentally, the patch for p_group_cohomology that I uploaded above also appeared in #30787 . - Marc On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 7:49:41 AM UTC-5 Marc Culler wrote: > The p_group_cohomology package

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread Marc Culler
Yes, there is a ticket for this. It is #34221 . The current version of Cython ignores .pxd files in directories with no __init__.py. The ticket backports a cython fix for that problem which will appear in a future Cython release. - Marc On Saturday,

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread Marc Culler
The p_group_cohomology package is included in the macOS binary release. it requires a patch to its spkg-install,sh. Symengine_py is also included in the macOS binary and also needs a patch. I am attaching a tarball of the build/pkg directories for those two packages. - Marc On Sunday,

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel
I would like to see the p_group_cohomology fixed. Progress got stalled on that, but I am happy to work on that (while I have time for August). Best, Travis On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 5:23:46 AM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > The sage_numerical_backends_* packages are on their way out

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-06 Thread Matthias Koeppe
The sage_numerical_backends_* packages are on their way out anyway. Coin support will switch to go through CVXPy in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34251, and Gurobi/CPLEX likewise in a follow up ticket On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 1:09:37 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > Thank you for the

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-06 Thread John H Palmieri
Thank you for the link. With this ticket, the gurobi and cplex backends still fail because I don't have gurobi and cplex installed. It would be nice if that was detected earlier in the process and the build failed right away. Actually, it is detected early in the process: /bin/sh: gurobi.sh:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-06 Thread Matthias Koeppe
The symengine ticket is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34141 On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 11:57:08 AM UTC-7 isu...@gmail.com wrote: > I haven't seen any reports about symengine.py failing to build. Can you > open an issue? > > Isuru > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 1:55 PM John H Palmieri >

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-06 Thread Matthias Koeppe
This one is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34221 On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 11:55:36 AM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > Also, the various sage_numerical_backend_* packages fail to build, with > errors like > > > Error compiling Cython file: >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-06 Thread Isuru Fernando
I haven't seen any reports about symengine.py failing to build. Can you open an issue? Isuru On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 1:55 PM John H Palmieri wrote: > Also, the various sage_numerical_backend_* packages fail to build, with > errors like > > > Error compiling Cython file: >

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-06 Thread John H Palmieri
Also, the various sage_numerical_backend_* packages fail to build, with errors like Error compiling Cython file: ... from sage.numerical.backends.generic_backend cimport GenericBackend ^

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-06 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Friday, August 5, 2022 at 9:49:21 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > The following packages do not build for me on OS X 12.5 (Monterrey), Intel > chip: > >- polylib (#33758) >- symengine_py (#34141) >- p_group_cohomology (#30787) >- r_jupyter >- rubiks > > I propose