Thu 2019-01-17 22:16:38 UTC+1, Simon King:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On 2019-01-17, Nils Bruin wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 12:11:03 PM UTC-8, Timo Kaufmann wrote:
> >>
> >> Thats 1/3rd improvement! Thanks to whoever is responsible for this.
>
> I guess it is mislabel. There was #26908 that
Hi all,
On 2019-01-17, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 12:11:03 PM UTC-8, Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>>
>> Result:
>> 8.5: 751.77ms
>> 8.6: 1033.39ms
>>
>> Thats 1/3rd improvement! Thanks to whoever is responsible for this.
>>
>> Did you mislabel those results? I would think that
Am Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2019 21:31:35 UTC+1 schrieb John H Palmieri:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 12:11:03 PM UTC-8, Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>>
>> When packaging sage 8.6, I noticed that startup felt unusually fast. So I
>> averaged the startup time over 100 runs:
>>
>> ```
>> for i in
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 12:11:03 PM UTC-8, Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>
> Result:
> 8.5: 751.77ms
> 8.6: 1033.39ms
>
> Thats 1/3rd improvement! Thanks to whoever is responsible for this.
>
> Did you mislabel those results? I would think that for startup time,
smaller is better. The numbers you
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 12:11:03 PM UTC-8, Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>
> When packaging sage 8.6, I noticed that startup felt unusually fast. So I
> averaged the startup time over 100 runs:
>
> ```
> for i in {1..100}; do
>
Are the file names interchanged here?
> "sage-8.5/bin/sage"
