The vote is now closed.
Hybrid: 8 top votes
pseudo-package: 2 top votes
copy: 0 top votes
Thanks to all voters.
François
On Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 11:38:40 AM UTC+12 François Bissey wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34152 needs help to decide what solution
> we
If I am allowed to vote, my vote is hybrid > copy files > pseudo package.
- Marc
On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 at 6:38:40 PM UTC-5 François Bissey wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34152 needs help to decide what solution
> we implement going forward.
>
> The ticket is
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022, 03:49 Nils Bruin, wrote:
> hybrid.
>
> [it provides an immediate solution to an urgent problem *and* it provides
> a reasonably automated path for updating. It does indeed put some files
> under sage git control that shouldn't be, but compared to the urgency of
> the problem
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022, 01:43 Matthias Koeppe,
wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 at 5:34:01 PM UTC-7 Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
>> I also fully agree with Dima that gnulib has no business being in Sage's
>> git tree
>>
>
> This is a mischaracterization. None of the approaches puts "gnulib in the
hybrid.
[it provides an immediate solution to an urgent problem *and* it provides a
reasonably automated path for updating. It does indeed put some files under
sage git control that shouldn't be, but compared to the urgency of the
problem at the moment, that's minor.
It looks to me that
hybrid > copy files > pseudo package
On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 at 5:56:01 PM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> hybrid
>
> Hearty thanks for setting up the vote.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
hybrid
Hearty thanks for setting up the vote.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on
On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 at 5:47:04 PM UTC-7 François Bissey wrote:
> In the interest of clarity and ease of counting for me, can we keep the
> thread onto votes and possibly voting issues.
>
> Arguments should go back to the ticket or a separate thread please.
>
+1
--
You received this
In the interest of clarity and ease of counting for me, can we keep the
thread onto votes and possibly voting issues.
Arguments should go back to the ticket or a separate thread please.
François
On 24/08/22 12:43, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 at 5:34:01 PM UTC-7 Travis
On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 at 5:34:01 PM UTC-7 Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> I also fully agree with Dima that gnulib has no business being in Sage's
> git tree
>
This is a mischaracterization. None of the approaches puts "gnulib in the
Sage git tree". I recommend to read the discussion on the
hybrid > sage psuedo > copy files package
I think we should be mindful that there can be people who build from source
who are not developers. So not having a dependency on git is a small bonus,
but I think almost everyone who has a non-Windows machine has git installed
on their computer by
Thanks for sending out the poll, Francois.
I endorse the "hybrid" variant.
On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 at 4:38:40 PM UTC-7 François Bissey wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34152 needs help to decide what solution
> we implement going forward.
>
> The ticket is concerned
12 matches
Mail list logo
