On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:41 AM 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-devel
wrote:
>
> "Would you conider posting your upgrade to Maxima (5.46.0 to 5.47.0) as a PR
> ?"
>
> I am sorry, I do not understand what you mean?
>
> I just followed instructions given in
>
"Would you conider posting your *upgrade* to Maxima (5.46.0 to 5.47.0) as a
PR ?"
I am sorry, I do not understand what you mean?
I just followed instructions given in
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/1ca4a47dbd7c59f09b4840d66f6ced9edde9686a/build/pkgs/maxima/SPKG.rst
To build sagemath
Le lundi 17 juillet 2023 à 04:59:53 UTC+2, Nasser M. Abbasi a écrit :
fyi, added PR
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35960
Would you conider posting your *upgrade* to Maxima (5.46.0 to 5.47.0) as a
PR ?
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 12:30:53 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Sunday,
fyi, added PR
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35960
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 12:30:53 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 5:48:00 AM UTC-7 Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
>
> After some struggle, build sagemath with maxima 5.47 upstream.
>
>
> Open a PR with the
FWIW, neither Maxima, Giac, Sympy, Fricas, the Wolfram engine nor the Rubi
integrator seem to be able to give a closed form to this antiderivative…
- Maxima (5.46.0) fails as reported above relatively quickly (a few
seconds).
-
the default integrator (i. e. what is called
I get the same error when evaluating this integral in Sage with its own
Maxima. (version 5.46.0).
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 10:30:53 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 5:48:00 AM UTC-7 Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
>
> After some struggle, build sagemath with maxima
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 5:48:00 AM UTC-7 Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
After some struggle, build sagemath with maxima 5.47 upstream.
Open a PR with the upgrade please
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this
