On 12 August 2014 10:29, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Hell !
- Nathann Cohen [first contribution]
- Nathann Cohen
[? New incarnation?]
I don't mind reincarnating, but I would prefer it to happen *after* I die.
Just think about how much more work you could get
On 12 August 2014 10:34, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 12.08.2014 11:29, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hell !
- Nathann Cohen [first contribution]
- Nathann Cohen
[? New incarnation?]
I don't mind reincarnating, but I would prefer it to happen *after* I die.
Well,
On 12/08/2014, at 21:34, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 12.08.2014 11:29, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hell !
- Nathann Cohen [first contribution]
- Nathann Cohen
[? New incarnation?]
I don't mind reincarnating, but I would prefer it to happen *after* I die.
Well,
IMHO we should just give up on correcting naming errors. If you can't
decide on how to write your own name then I would call it a feature that
each novel spelling is a first contribution
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:14:09 PM UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote:
I'm happy to add the release log,
Hmm, I have another issue then because, as shown above, the only 6.3 tag
that I am getting is 6.3.beta0 (my list is also alphabetical, it's just
missing all of the other 6.3 tags).
OK, I just fixed my problem with a git fetch.
*Question*: Is
git pull --ff-only 6.3
not the recommended way to
If you want to update your local master branch you should do:
git checkout master# switch to your local master branch
git pull --ff-only trac master
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 1:26:30 PM UTC+1, Andrew wrote:
git pull --ff-only 6.3
not the recommended way to update the master branch to a
