Is in out swapped?
On Thursday, May 14, 2015 at 1:04:54 PM UTC+2, Harald Schilly wrote:
With the new setup, I have started to monitor its operation more closely.
If someone is interested, attached are the traffic spikes for the network
-- initially your upload, then the subsequent syncs.
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I built sage-6.7.beta4 fine, then did git pull, then build
sage-6.7.beta5 fine, which passed all tests. But I can't do ./sage
-bdist ...:
sage -t --long --warn-long 64.2
local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sagenb-0.11.4-py2.7.egg/sagenb/misc/sphinxify.py
[14
On Thursday, May 14, 2015 at 10:09:11 AM UTC-7, leif wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I built sage-6.7.beta4 fine, then did git pull, then build
sage-6.7.beta5 fine, which passed all tests. But I can't do ./sage
-bdist ...:
sage -t --long --warn-long 64.2
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
As usual, get the develop git branch. We now measure the fastest mirror
and download packages from there, this should result in a net speedup. Let
us know if you encounter any problems.
Alternatively, the
Hi,
I built sage-6.7.beta4 fine, then did git pull, then build
sage-6.7.beta5 fine, which passed all tests. But I can't do ./sage
-bdist ...:
sage -t --long --warn-long 64.2
local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sagenb-0.11.4-py2.7.egg/sagenb/misc/sphinxify.py
[14 tests, 1.23 s]
As usual, get the develop git branch or the self-contained source tarball
from the mirrors.
This now even builds if you don't have autotools. I'm planning to release
6.7 asap so we have a stable version that can be compiled due to the
tarball hosting changes, so now is your chance to give it a
Harald Schilly wrote:
Looks good to me, at least the numbers make sense.
The numbers. But Teewurst in NYC? Really? 8-)
-leif
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-release group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
$ make ptestlong
--
All tests passed!
--
(ubuntu x86_64)
On 14/05/15 01:57, Volker Braun wrote:
As usual, get the develop git branch. We now measure the
for the network
-- initially your upload, then the subsequent syncs. The second screenshot
are the traffic totals per remote host (in and out is reversed, I think)
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Cz3ivt9hDSE/VVSAs9aPTKI/ivc/9MhhTX-bdRU/s1600/gce-smo-network-20150514.png
https://lh3