Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

2017-11-16 Thread Kwankyu Lee
On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 8:38:52 PM UTC+9, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > > It seems that sympy simply wasn't built. I am not aware of any bug in > the build system (especially not specific to OS X) which could cause that. > The fresh build (of actually Sage 8.1rc1) finished with no

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1.rc1 released

2017-11-16 Thread Justin C. Walker
> On Nov 16, 2017, at 05:51 , Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Built from a fresh clone of the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

2017-11-16 Thread Kwankyu Lee
> > Sorry to ask a silly question, but are you sure that > > (1) You actually ran "make" > Yes. But this was not a fresh one. I ran "make distclean", and then "make". > (2) That run of "make" succeeded without errors > There was an error in building doc. I ignored this as there was no

[sage-release] Sage 8.1.rc1 released

2017-11-16 Thread Volker Braun
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html e47ca9ea99 (tag: 8.1.rc1, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 8.1.rc1 1e26386030 Trac #24191: fpylll broken on

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

2017-11-16 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2017-11-16 07:38, Kwankyu Lee wrote: I get the following just after "make", Sorry to ask a silly question, but are you sure that (1) You actually ran "make" (2) That run of "make" succeeded without errors It seems that sympy simply wasn't built. I am not aware of any bug in the build