[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc2 released

8.1.rc2 : - builds and passes ptestlong without any error on two different Debian machines. - does *NOT* build on Cygwin running Windows 10 + "Fall Creators Update" : psutil does not build. This is fixed in Trac#24121 , which has positive

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1.rc1 released

On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 10:37:22 PM UTC-5, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 1:31:44 PM UTC-5, Justin C. Walker wrote: >> >> >> > On Nov 17, 2017, at 10:12 , kcrisman wrote: >> > >> > I'm building this from scratch on Mac from tarball, would

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1.rc1 released

On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 1:31:44 PM UTC-5, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > > > On Nov 17, 2017, at 10:12 , kcrisman > wrote: > > > > I'm building this from scratch on Mac from tarball, would appreciate if > we waited on releasing 8.1 until I can confirm notebook

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1.rc2 released

> On Nov 17, 2017, at 05:29 , Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Built from a fresh clone of the

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 10:40:22 AM UTC-8, Simon King wrote: > > Hi John, > > On 2017-11-17, John H Palmieri wrote: > >> And WHY that change was made! > >> > > > > If it takes a while to build the documentation, better to start as soon > as > > possible,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

Hi John, On 2017-11-17, John H Palmieri wrote: >> And WHY that change was made! >> > > If it takes a while to build the documentation, better to start as soon as > possible, rather than to wait until the last possible time, right? If the user's purpose is to use Sage,

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1.rc1 released

> On Nov 17, 2017, at 10:12 , kcrisman wrote: > > I'm building this from scratch on Mac from tarball, would appreciate if we > waited on releasing 8.1 until I can confirm notebook things working there. > Or Justin can check out notebook functionality on his build.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc1 released

I'm building this from scratch on Mac from tarball, would appreciate if we waited on releasing 8.1 until I can confirm notebook things working there. Or Justin can check out notebook functionality on his build. Thanks! On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 8:20:49 AM UTC-5, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

On 2017-11-17 14:51, Kwankyu Lee wrote: This (building the documentation is no longer the last step) sounds a big change to me. I wonder when that change was made. In Sage 6.8, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18710 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 6:37:54 AM UTC-8, Simon King wrote: > > On 2017-11-17, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > Ah, I didn't know that. This (building the documentation is no longer > the > > last step) sounds a big change to me. I wonder when that change was > made. > >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

On 2017-11-17, Thierry wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 02:37:37PM +, Simon King wrote: > >> Is it still possible to build SageMath without documentation ("make start")? > > make build Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 02:37:37PM +, Simon King wrote: > Is it still possible to build SageMath without documentation ("make start")? make build Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

Hi, Le vendredi 17 novembre 2017 15:15:13 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > > > Is this normal situation? This betrays my belief that a command like > > $ sage -t src/sage/rings/finite_rings/* > > always works fine. > > You should use instead sage -t src/sage/rings/finite_rings/ (skip the *) Best

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

I noticed this: $ sage -t src/sage/rings/finite_rings/* Running doctests with ID 2017-11-17-23-04-49-f065787a. Git branch: finite_field_extension_trac24195_dev Using --optional=mpir,python2,sage Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/Kwankyu/GitHub/sage/src/bin/sage-runtests", line

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 6:53:41 PM UTC+9, Thierry wrote: > > > How much available RAM do you have ? Building the documentation is no > longer the last step, hence if that fails, everything after that is not > built. Ah, I didn't know that. This (building the documentation is no

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1.rc2 released

You were too quick, its up now ;-) On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 8:40:32 AM UTC-5, Thierry wrote: > > Hi, > > "git fetch trac develop" still gives me rc1. > > Ciao, > Thierry > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 05:29:56AM -0800, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1.rc2 released

Hi, "git fetch trac develop" still gives me rc1. Ciao, Thierry On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 05:29:56AM -0800, Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >

[sage-release] Sage 8.1.rc2 released

As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 92f95cef93 (tag: 8.1.rc2) Updated SageMath version to 8.1.rc2 50a34e5f43 Trac #24192: -std=c99 causes numerous

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc1 released

On Ubuntu 16.04 x86_64 Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM, from a fresh git clone + pull develop, parallel (-j16) build OK. ptestlong OK as well, modulo 2 doctests: sage -t --long --warn-long 46.1 src/sage/plot/plot3d/implicit_plot3d.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t --long --warn-long 46.1

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

Hi, On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 05:05:11PM -0800, Kwankyu Lee wrote: [...] > There was an error in building doc. I ignored this as there was no problem > in running Sage. > How much available RAM do you have ? Builging the documentation is no longer the last step, hence if that fails, everything

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

On 2017-11-17 02:05, Kwankyu Lee wrote: There was an error in building doc. There you have it! The build didn't succeed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0 released

It might be that a dependency is missing somewhere. While building rc1, I had to start make for the 2nd time for no apparent reason. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from