[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

2019-11-27 Thread Simon King
Hi Dima, which one? meataxe or p_group_cohomology? How would either of them influence the gap packages? And is there a ticket for it? Best regards, Simon On 2019-11-27, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > IIRC this comes from Simon King's optional package. > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, 16:11 John Cremona,

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

2019-11-27 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Thank you, Dima ! Upgrading my rebuilt 9.0beta6 to 9.0beta7 on my core i7/16 GB machine gives me 14 transient failures and the three permanent failures already knows (two GLPK-related and explained by Dima, one related to gap_packages, already known and explained). For completeness' sake: |

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

2019-11-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
there is also a small GLPK 4.65 discrepancy coming from a patch that Sage applies, but most distros don't. On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:39 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Since https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28459 > Sage can use GLPK from the system, if it's version 4.63 or newer. Sage has >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

2019-11-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Since https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28459 Sage can use GLPK from the system, if it's version 4.63 or newer. Sage has 4.65. The slight discrepancy in GLPK tests is due to this version difference, and it's harmless. (I set it to 4.63 to cover many more Linux distros) On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:28

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

2019-11-27 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
*THIS WAS A MISTAKE: *those resuts are for *9.0.beta6*, not *beta7*. Rebuilding beta7 and tests underway... Sorry for the noise... Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 22:07:14 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > > I tried to recompile from scratch (i. e. make distclean ; make ; > resinsttalling

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

2019-11-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
IIRC this comes from Simon King's optional package. On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, 16:11 John Cremona, wrote: > I had this failure (I have gap_packages installed): > > sage -t --long --warn-long 59.7 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py > ** >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

2019-11-27 Thread John H Palmieri
It's okay with Python 3, but I'm getting a failure on OS X when built with Python 2: sage -t --long --warn-long 68.2 src/sage/libs/pynac/pynac.pyx ** File "src/sage/libs/pynac/pynac.pyx", line 295, in

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

2019-11-27 Thread John Cremona
I had this failure (I have gap_packages installed): sage -t --long --warn-long 59.7 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py ** File "src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py", line 8, in sage.tests.gap_packages Failed example:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

2019-11-27 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Using --optional=4ti2,cbc,ccache,cryptominisat,dot2tex,e_antic,external,glucose,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,memlimit,normaliz,notedown,openssl,pandoc_attributes,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sagenb -- sage -t --long

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

2019-11-27 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Doubleplusungood... On Deboan testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM, ptestalllong gets me (part of) the usual suspects (transient failures, plus 6 (six) permanent failures due to abort: | File | Result | P/T |