Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.0.beta0 released

2023-02-12 Thread Henri Girard
Thanks :) I have been waiting for this version 10, already sage-9 has many improvment I found very useful (though I use sage in a very special way, since I can make %run .ipynb) I call it   Voie sage =dao de sage =Tao sage =道 sage Best Henri Le 13/02/2023 à 00:54, Volker Braun a écrit :

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta0 released

2023-02-12 Thread Matthias Köppe
Thanks, Volker. I have closed the corresponding GitHub issues. On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 3:54:51 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >

[sage-release] Sage 10.0.beta0 released

2023-02-12 Thread Volker Braun
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html This contains all remaining positively reviewed tickets that merged without issue. Since trac is read-only these

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 released

2023-02-12 Thread Matthias Köppe
It's also displayed in the terminal (not just the log file), just before the other messages that are there for the user to read. On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 10:14:13 AM UTC-8 Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: > I see. But I think it would be much better to stop the script immediately > and give an

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 released

2023-02-12 Thread 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release
I see. But I think it would be much better to stop the script immediately and give an error message at the terminal, may even be with a loud beep as well to alert the user. One can still overlook these warnings if they are in the log file. But now I know, I will make sure to check the log file

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 released

2023-02-12 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 5:04 PM 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release < sage-release@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Thanks. That was it. I did not notice the `3` was missing when I typed it. > Now it works: > > >sage > │ SageMath version 9.8, Release Date: 2023-02-11 > │ Using Python 3.11.1. Type

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 released

2023-02-12 Thread 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release
Thanks. That was it. I did not notice the `3` was missing when I typed it. Now it works: >sage │ SageMath version 9.8, Release Date: 2023-02-11 │ Using Python 3.11.1. Type "help()" for help. I find it very strange that sagemath ./configure will accept an

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 released

2023-02-12 Thread Matthias Köppe
>From config.log, one can see that you typed " "./configure --with-system-python=no" but the correct option is "--with-system-python3=no". On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:10:11 AM UTC-8 Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: > Thanks. I downloaded 9.8 and build it OK. No errors building it. > > But unlike

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8 on Debian testing

2023-02-12 Thread Dima Pasechnik
it would be interesting to have a look at logs/pkgs/singular*.log On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 12:44 PM Thierry Dumont wrote: > > > Le 12/02/2023 à 13:33, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > /sage -tp src/sage/libs/singular/ > > Ok this gives a segfault and may be other problems. > (file joined) >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8 on Debian testing

2023-02-12 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 9:19 AM Thierry Dumont wrote: > Restarting from a fresh clone of 9.8 (from github): > > ./configure --without-system-singular (is it necessary now? it was with > 9.8rc*) > > I got a problem building the documentation, which seems to be a segfault. > Logfile is joined. > >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 released

2023-02-12 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 9:10 AM 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release < sage-release@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Thanks. I downloaded 9.8 and build it OK. No errors building it. > > But unlike 9.8 rc1, I see that 9.8 is back to using system python which is > 3.10.9 and not sagemath python 3.11.1

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 released

2023-02-12 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; lang="en" xml:lang="en"> #content { max-width: 60em; margin: auto; } .title { text-align: center; margin-bottom: .2em; } .subtitle { text-align: center; font-size: medium;

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 released

2023-02-12 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, upgrading `9.8.rc1` to `9.8` and running `ptestlong` results in three permanent failures : | Doctest| Result| ||---| |

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 released

2023-02-12 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, upgrading 9.8.rc1 to 9.8 and running ptestlong results in three permanent failures : Doctest Result src/sage/interfaces/fricas.py 3 doctests failed src/sage/graphs/generators/families.py 2 doctests failed src/sage/graphs/graph_generators.py 1

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8 released

2023-02-12 Thread 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release
Thanks. I downloaded 9.8 and build it OK. No errors building it. But unlike 9.8 rc1, I see that 9.8 is back to using system python which is 3.10.9 and not sagemath python 3.11.1 like 9.8 rc1 did, even though I used the same exact configuration commands. These are the commands I used unset