eed not compatible (yet) with flint-3.0.0, see
> https://github.com/flatsurf/e-antic/issues/263
>
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 08:32, 'tsc...@ucdavis.edu' via sage-release
> wrote:
> >
> > I am having an issue building e_antic that was not present for building
> 10.2 from source. I've
I am having an issue building e_antic that was not present for building
10.2 from source. I've included the log file below. I first tried without
installing anything extra and then with a system libantic installation.
Both resulted in the same log file.
Best,
Travis
Using cached file
I don't think it should be random; that has the chance of hiding actual
bugs. I think we should check that it belongs to a particular set
(specifically, the one from John's comment).
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 5:15:52 AM UTC+9 chris wuthrich wrote:
> I agree with John. Lines
Volker, if you're going to do another rc version, would it be possible to
also include #35432? It contains an important fix for #35036 that will be
added to 10.0.
Thanks,
Travis
On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 at 5:57:10 AM UTC+9 Kenji Iohara wrote:
> On Mac 0S 13.3.1with Intel Core i5, updated
Thank you, that worked.
Best,
Travis
On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 11:28:48 AM UTC+9 matthia...@gmail.com
wrote:
> ./configure --without-system-nauty
>
> On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 4:30:05 PM UTC-8 tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote:
>
>> Would it be better to just remove nauty or is there a way
Would it be better to just remove nauty or is there a way to force Sage to
build and link with its own copy of nauty?
Thanks,
Travis
On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 6:51:45 PM UTC+9 François Bissey wrote:
> It is indeed a known issue with nauty on debian/ubuntu. That's the first
> time
I am getting stuck at giac, even after a make distclean (I rebuilt
9.8.beta6 just to confirm this is a problem with the upgrade and almost
certainly due to #34857). Sorry for posting the log files; I can't seem to
include attachments...
[giac-1.9.0.15p0] /usr/bin/ld:
I am not able to do an incremental build. Do we really need to do a "make
distclean" because of #34268?
Best,
Travis
On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 7:56:17 AM UTC+9 Volker Braun wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the
This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34635.
Best,
Travis
On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 8:15:55 PM UTC+9 emanuel.c...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Debian testing running non core i5 + 8 GB RAM, upgrading 9.7 to
> 9.8.beta1 leads to one permanent failure :
>
>
I just tried additionally installing gap_packages, and this seemed to be
fine. I don't know what caused it to rebuild everything, but it seems to be
fine/transient.
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, September 8, 2022 at 1:45:13 AM UTC+9 John H Palmieri wrote:
> I just tried this, and I didn't see the
>
> The first one succeeds when run alone, as usual.
> The second one is known (see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33212).
> But the third one seems to be persistent:
> sage -t --long --warn-long 51.2
> --random-seed=198215171617055102915898533596178546091
>
I just did a build from scratch using "make build", started Sage, and then
"./sage -i dot2tex" and it seems to be rebuilding everything. Is this
expected? I haven't explicitly tested this on previous beta versions, but
this seems like a bug. I am a bit hesitant to try it out on other packages
One thing I (and probably Martin) would really appreciate if it could be
included in the next stable release is
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32324, which does lazy multivariate power
series rings (with the eventual intent to replace LazyPowerSeriesRing).
Best,
Travis
On Monday, August 8,
> Is anyone else seeing docbuilding issues? I am getting
>
> [sagemath_doc_html-none] __import__(module_name)
> [sagemath_doc_html-none] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
> 'sage.combinat.nu_dyck_word'
>
> which is resulting the doc not building for me via "make". I have also run
>
Is anyone else seeing docbuilding issues? I am getting
[sagemath_doc_html-none] __import__(module_name)
[sagemath_doc_html-none] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'sage.combinat.nu_dyck_word'
which is resulting the doc not building for me via "make". I have also run
"make doc-clean" and
I don't know when these errors started to appear, but I am getting the
following failures:
Using
--optional=4ti2,bliss,coxeter3,debian,e_antic,fricas,gap_packages,latte_int,libsemigroups,lidia,meataxe,normaliz,pip,sage,sage_spkg,tides
Features to be detected:
On Ubuntu with a bunch of optional packages installed, I am getting the
following failures due to pynormaliz:
Using
--optional=bliss,coxeter3,database_knotinfo,debian,dot2tex,e_antic,fricas,gap_packages,kenzo,libsemigroups,lidia,meataxe,normaliz,pip,pynormaliz,sage,sage_spkg,sirocco,tides
> Instead of modifying the .gitattributes file, you could try adding it to
> .git/info/attributes which is local to your repository.
>
>
Thank you. I will try that next time.
I am a little hesitant to modify the full repo .gitattributes with this as
this might have a number of other
Something that has come up a few times when doing these upgrades for me has
been line endings causing git to think a file has changed which makes
merging things cleaning a major PITA. I believe this is caused by #31306,
and what I have to do is add this line to .gitattributes
*.png binary
and
Thank you Volker for merging many of the tickets.
I would appreciate it if we could have #32006 merged for the next release
since it contains a number of minor but still very important documentation
changes (such as changing information about the default 3d viewers). If we
are also cutting
>
> > I think we are in a reasonable shape right now, so if anyone is still in
> favor of a fast release cycle we could do it now... discuss ;-)
>
> I'd like to see #30668 merged (as well as all the other users of autoconf
> 2.71)
> #32079 is a configure bugfix, positively reviewed 20 days
PS - Technically this should be on the 9.4.beta2 release since that is when
the ticket #31815 was included.
On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 2:12:01 PM UTC+10 tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote:
> I also ran into the same problem as Sébastien on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS and
> would like a better solution than just
I also ran into the same problem as Sébastien on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS and would
like a better solution than just having to manually configure the Python
version.
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, June 24, 2021 at 7:20:20 PM UTC+10 Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> Upgrading from 9.4.beta0, my first attempt with
This might help for some of the failing internet tests:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29787
On Thursday, June 25, 2020 at 6:29:42 AM UTC+10 Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> Testing various optional and external packages (on June 15, but I am
> reporting only now sorry for the delay), I get
>
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
