[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.3.beta6 released

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 10.3.beta5 with system python (3.10.12): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.3.beta3 released

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 10.3.beta1 with system python (3.10.12): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.3.beta3 released

Hi Vincent, Le mardi 19 décembre 2023 à 09:16:11 UTC+1, vdelecroix a écrit : Build does not work if python-flit is not present [editables-0.5] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'flit_core' [editables-0.5] Error building a wheel for editables-0.5 For the record, I don't have this issue

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.3.beta1 released

Thanks for the release. On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - parallel build (-j16) from a fresh git clone + pull develop, with system python (3.10.12): OK - make ptestlong gave a single error: sage -t --long --random-seed=676542016572831857751872562668780748

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc4 released

Le mardi 21 novembre 2023 à 07:42:26 UTC+1, tdumont a écrit : For me: -Debian testing, up to date -upgraded from 10.2 rc3 (NO make distclean) it works: sage: -log(1-x).series(x).simplify() 1/19*x^19 + 1/18*x^18 + 1/17*x^17 + 1/16*x^16 + 1/15*x^15 + 1/14*x^14 + 1/13*x^13 + 1/12*x^12 +

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc4 released

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 10.2.rc3, with system python (3.10.12): OK - make ptestlong fails on src/sage/libs/giac/__init__.py: sage -t --long --warn-long 65.0 --random-seed=32308605943777602951638175933820216

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc3 released

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 10.2.rc2, with system python (3.10.12): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc2 released

Thank you for having merged https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36529 ! Eric. Le dimanche 12 novembre 2023 à 22:42:41 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc0 released

Thanks for the rc release. The function view() is still broken in it, but https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36529 offers a fix. It would be nice if it could be merged in the final 10.2 release. Eric. Le dimanche 5 novembre 2023 à 18:22:44 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : > As always, you

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta4 released

Le lundi 25 septembre 2023 à 20:21:23 UTC+2, matthia...@gmail.com a écrit : The real error is further up in the log file: INFO: gcc -shared -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wl,-rpath-link,/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta4 released

Thanks for the release. On Ubuntu 22.04, incremental build from Sage 10.2.beta3 failed with [sagelib-10.2.beta4] error: Command "gcc -shared -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wl,-rpath-link,/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta1 released

Le samedi 2 septembre 2023 à 18:14:53 UTC+2, emanuel.c...@gmail.com a écrit : On Debian testing, : - Upgrading 10.2.beta0 to beta0 to 10.2.beta1 fails by *repeatedly* failing to create one 3D plot in the documentation (lost exact reference, sorry…) ; rebuilding all

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.0.rc1 released

Le samedi 29 avril 2023 à 08:26:18 UTC+2, tdumont a écrit : When upgrading from rc0 to rc1 (Debian testing) I got an error when building "manifolds" documentation: FWIW, I did the same (upgrading from rc0 to rc1) on Ubuntu 22.04 and did not get such an error. Eric. -- You received this

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta7 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM, after make sagelib-clean sagelib-uninstall : 1/ parallel (-j16) build terminated successully ("Sage build/upgrade complete!") but with many error messages while building the documentation: [sagemath_doc_html-none]

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta6 released

Le lundi 27 mars 2023 à 17:06:35 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : make sagelib-clean sagelib-uninstall make This solved the issue. Thank you Dima! Eric. On Mon, 27 Mar 2023, 16:03 Eric Gourgoulhon, wrote: Le lundi 27 mars 2023 à 17:00:12 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : Hi

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta6 released

Le lundi 27 mars 2023 à 17:00:12 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : Hi, On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U @1.9 GHz + 32 GB RAM, incremental parallel (-j8) build from Sage 10.0.beta4 failed while building the documentation. Running make doc-clean doc-uninstall and then make again

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta6 released

Hi, On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U @1.9 GHz + 32 GB RAM, incremental parallel (-j8) build from Sage 10.0.beta4 failed while building the documentation. Running make doc-clean doc-uninstall and then make again did not help. The issue seems to be in

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta3 released

Thank you for the release. On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - build (-j16) from a fresh git clone and with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. Le vendredi 3 mars 2023 à 01:03:32 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : > As always, you can get

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

Le lundi 30 janvier 2023 à 13:59:27 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.8.beta7, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> all tests passed except for sage -t --long --warn-long 66.8 --random-s

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.8.beta7, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> all tests passed except for sage -t --long --warn-long 66.8 --random-seed=81878619703120460056743231466438357448 src/sage/env.py

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta3 released

Thanks for the new release. On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.8.beta2, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.rc1 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.7.rc0, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta3 released

Thanks for the new release. On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - build (-j16) from a fresh git clone with system Python (3.8.10): OK (*) - make ptestlong --> all tests passed except for src/sage/modular/overconvergent/hecke_series.py, due to

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta2 released

Le vendredi 17 juin 2022 à 19:49:31 UTC+2, matthia...@gmail.com a écrit : > On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 5:56:46 AM UTC-7 egourg...@gmail.com wrote: > >> this is the first version of Sage that refuses to use the system Python, >> which is 3.8.10. Although only Python 3.7 is officially dropped

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.beta2 released

Thanks for the new release. On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.7.beta1: OK (but see below) - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Side note: this is the first version of Sage that refuses to use the system Python, which is 3.8.10.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6 released

Thank you Volker for the release! On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - parallel build (-j16) from a fresh git clone, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.rc0 released

Thanks for this release candidate! On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta7 with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta7 released

Thanks for the new release. On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta6 with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta5 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta4 with system python (3.8.10): first attempt failed in building Sage doc; running "make doc-clean doc-uninstall" and make again lead to a successful build. - make ptestlong --> "All tests

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta3 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta2 with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta2 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta1 with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong failed with sage -t --long --warn-long 70.3 --random-seed=166484064187536079316870694317400346754

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta1 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from Sage 9.6.beta0 with system python (3.8.10) failed with the error: [sagemath_doc_html-none] ImportError: libflint.so.15: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Running "make sagelib-clean" as

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.6.beta0 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - parallel build (-j16) from a fresh git clone, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

Thank you Volker for the release! On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - parallel build (-j16) from a fresh git clone, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong: passed, except for 2 doctests in src/sage/game_theory/parser.py This failure is the lrslib issue dealt with in

[sage-release] Re: after edit the sage library, sage -b now tells "Nothing to (re)build / all up-to-date."

This is fixed in Sage 9.5.rc1, cf. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33130 Eric. Le vendredi 14 janvier 2022 à 15:44:15 UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé a écrit : > With 9.5.rc0, I modify a file in the sage library, then > > $ sage -b > Nothing to (re)build / all up-to-date. > > does nothing. This is a new

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

Le vendredi 14 janvier 2022 à 11:54:23 UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé a écrit : > On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 10:10:00 AM UTC+1 egourg...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> This is a permanent failure: >> sage -t --long --warn-long 67.0 >> --random-seed=127661401430613686989226810121136436198 >>

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

Le vendredi 14 janvier 2022 à 11:00:31 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > is this system-wide lrslib? > Yes this is from Ubuntu package lrslib 0.70-3. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta8, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> 2 doctests failed in src/sage/game_theory/parser.py This is a permanent failure: sage -t --long --warn-long 67.0

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc0 released

Hi Volker, Thank you for this release. Would it be possible to include https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30362 in the next rc if any? This ticket has been in positive review state for 17 days; it introduces symplectic structures on manifolds and it would be nice if Sage 9.5 is shipped with

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta8 released

Hi Volker, Le dimanche 12 décembre 2021 à 15:19:57 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : > > We should probably make a release some time soon... if you have anything > that you want to get into 9.5 then get it polished now ;) > Could you please merge https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30362 ? It

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta8 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta7, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta7 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta6, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta6 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta5, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong results in 1 failure: ** File "src/sage/plot/plot.py", line 1782, in

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta3 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta2, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta2 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta1, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta1 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build from 9.5.beta0, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta0 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U with 16 TB of RAM: - build from a fresh git clone and using system Python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong: OK ("All tests passed!") Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To

[sage-release] Issue with sage-9.3-Ubuntu_20.04-x86_64.tar.bz2

Hi all, I've just noticed that when running ./sage immediately after unpacking sage-9.3-Ubuntu_20.04-x86_64.tar.bz2 on a freshly installed Ubuntu 20.04.2 system, one gets the error message /usr/bin/python: not found The issue is immediately fixed by installing the Ubuntu package

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3 released

Thank you Volker! Le lundi 10 mai 2021 à 23:24:54 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.3. As always, you can > get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, > the self-contained source tarball is at >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.rc1 released

Thanks for this release. Would it be possible to merge the positively reviewed ticket https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31536 in the next rc? This ticket - fixes the blocker https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31513 - fixes the %matplotlib notebook magic, which is broken in a %display latex

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.beta2 released

Le mercredi 25 novembre 2020 à 14:02:06 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > this one? > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30945 > > Yes, exactly. On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 12:59 PM Eric Gourgoulhon > wrote: > > > > > > Le mercredi 25 novembre 2020 à 13:35:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.beta2 released

Le mercredi 25 novembre 2020 à 13:35:31 UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé a écrit : > On Ubuntu 18.04, running tests with various optional and external > packages, I get: > > Using >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.rc0 released

Le mercredi 7 octobre 2020 à 16:40:16 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U + 32 GB RAM: > > - incremental build (-j8) from 9.2.beta14 with system Python (=3.8.2): OK > - all tests from ptestlong passed, except for > > sage -t --lon

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.rc0 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U + 32 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j8) from 9.2.beta14 with system Python (=3.8.2): OK - all tests from ptestlong passed, except for sage -t --long --warn-long 74.5 --random-seed=0 src/sage/quadratic_forms/quadratic_form__equivalence_testing.py

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta14 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U + 32 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j8) from 9.2.beta13 with system Python (=3.8.2): OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Although make ptestlong reports "All tests passed!", two Ubuntu crash reports have been generated during the ptestlong run: 1/

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta13 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.2.beta12: OK - make ptestlong: all tests passed. Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

Le mercredi 16 septembre 2020 à 19:05:59 UTC+2, Samuel Lelievre a écrit : > > Recommendations of packages to install can still be improved, > see the dedicated ticket: > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29586 > > but we need to balance the maintenance effort with the gains. > Indeed! > >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

Le mercredi 16 septembre 2020 à 11:59:40 UTC+2, vdelecroix a écrit : > Le 16/09/2020 à 11:51, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > > Side note: the launch of Sage in a terminal is very fast on this > computer, > > less then 2 seconds. Maybe this is due to the use of the system

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U + 32 GB RAM: - build (-j8) from a fresh git clone with a maximum of system packages (details below), including the system Python (3.8.2): OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Details of build: As recommended in

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.2.beta6: OK - make ptestlong: all tests passed. Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

Hi, Le lundi 7 septembre 2020 à 07:21:19 UTC+2, matthia...@gmail.com a écrit : > > ubuntu-bionic-standard (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/1078907737 > > ): > [dochtml] UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta7 released

Le mardi 4 août 2020 08:54:54 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > > Of note : I lost the ability to launch the Jupyter notebook, as reported > in Trac#30123 ; the make build > workaround doesn’t work around this bug anymore. > Indeed. But as mentioned

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta7 released

A workaround is proposed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30123#comment:8 Le lundi 3 août 2020 15:16:42 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > > > > Le lundi 3 août 2020 14:46:51 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : >> >> ISTR that make build may unhose you, even if

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta7 released

Le lundi 3 août 2020 14:46:51 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > > ISTR that make build may unhose you, even if sage -b is (temporarily ?) > broken. > Thanks for your suggestion. Unfortunately, "make build" did not help (same error message). Eric. -- You received this message because

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta7 released

Upgrading from Sage 9.2.beta6, the Jupyter notebook is broken: opening a notebook results in a blank page, with the following error message in the console: [W 12:43:20.344 NotebookApp] 404 GET /nbextensions/mathjax/MathJax.js?config=TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML-full,Safe=configured (127.0.0.1)

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta3 released

Hi, Le mercredi 8 juillet 2020 00:56:55 UTC+2, Justin C. Walker a écrit : > > > So today, I dutifully did the same thing (for beta3). However, once > getting the repository in place, there was no “./configure”. > > You should run make configure first. In other words, the full build process

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta2 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.2.beta1 after export LANG=C.UTF-8: OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release"

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1 released

Le vendredi 22 mai 2020 21:17:42 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > > Binaries are now on their way to the mirrors! > Thanks. What about the binaries for Windows? Some users are asking for them on ask.sagemath and apparently, they are not yet on the mirrors. Eric. -- You received this message

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta7 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.1.beta6: OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta6 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.1.beta5: OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta5 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.1.beta4: OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta4 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.1.beta3: OK - make ptestlong reports the same failure as with 9.1.beta3: sage -t --long --warn-long 53.7 src/sage/groups/cubic_braid.py # 1 doctest failed Details in the

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta2 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.1.beta1: OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta1 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.1.beta0: OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.beta0 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - build (with -j16) from a fresh git clone + pull develop: OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0 released

Thank you very much Volker! And congratulations to all people who made the Python 3 switch possible, especially to Frédéric Chapoton! Happy New Year! Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.rc1 released

Le mardi 31 décembre 2019 09:40:06 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit : > > I have problems when building R 3.6.2 on my (usually rather stable) Ubuntu > patchbot. > Which version of Ubuntu? I could build R 3.6.2 without any trouble on Ubuntu 18.04, with the system BLAS (i.e. the Ubuntu package

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.rc1 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on Core i7-6700HQ + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j8) from 9.0.rc0 OK - all tests from ptestlong passed, except for a transient failure: sage -t --long --warn-long 86.4 src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py # 2 doctests failed This is the same error as that already reported

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.rc0 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on Core i7-6700HQ + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j8) from 9.0.beta10 OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta10 released

Le mardi 24 décembre 2019 18:03:53 UTC+1, John Cremona a écrit : > > On behalf of all Sage users and deleopers I would like to thank Volker for > all his efforts over yet another year as release manager. Your work is > much appreciated > +1 Thank you Volker! Here is my report: On Ubuntu

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta9 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.0.beta8: OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta8 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.0.beta7: OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - incremental build (with -j16) from 9.0.beta6: OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta6 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer: - default (i.e. Python 3) build with -j16 from a fresh git clone + pull develop OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta5 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer and for a *python3 *build: - incremental build (from 9.0.beta4, with -j16) OK - all tests from ptestlong passed Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release"

[sage-release] Re: [sage-support] Changelog for Sage?

Regarding the "digest summary of important major changes" asked by this user, maybe it is time to reactivate #22176 ? Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta4 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on a bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM computer and for a *python3 *build: - incremental build (from 9.0.beta3, with -j16) OK - all tests from ptestlong passed This is the first time that Python-3 Sage passes all the tests on this computer! (thanks to the

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta3 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM and for a *python3 *build: - incremental build (from 9.0.beta2, with -j16) OK - tests from ptestlong passed, except for -- sage -t --long --warn-long 51.1

[sage-release] Re: Ubuntu binaries for Sage 8.9?

Le lundi 21 octobre 2019 00:33:57 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > > Ubuntu 18.04 binaries are now up! > Thank you very much! Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta1 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM: *- python2: * - incremental build (from 9.0.beta0, with -j16) OK - all tests from ptestlong passed - *python3: * - incremental build (from 9.0.beta0, with -j16) OK - tests from ptestlong passed, except for

[sage-release] Re: Ubuntu binaries for Sage 8.9?

May I ask about the Ubuntu 18.04 binaries? Some users are complaining about the lack of them: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-support/UBOR-iAq_VY/PTOwaVt2CQAJ or are downloading the unique Ubuntu binary available (for 16.04) and are facing a crash since they are running Ubuntu 18.04:

[sage-release] Re: Ubuntu binaries for Sage 8.9?

Le samedi 12 octobre 2019 15:35:44 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > > I just copied the Ubuntu 16.04 binaries. The buildbot was having some dns > problems so the binaries are late. > > Thank you Volker! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-release] Ubuntu binaries for Sage 8.9?

Hi, There are no Ubuntu 18.04 binaries for Sage 8.9 on the mirrors listed at http://www.sagemath.org/download-linux.html, while there are binaries for Debian since September 30. Is there any issue in producing these binaries? (having a look at http://build.sagemath.org/, it seems that Ubuntu

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta0 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM: *- python2: * - build (with -j16) from a fresh git clone + pull develop OK - all tests from ptestlong passed - *python3: * - incremental build (from 8.9, with -j16) OK - tests from ptest-python3 passed, except for 1

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.rc0 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM: *- python2: * - incremental build (from 8.9.beta9, with -j16) OK - all tests from ptestlong passed - *python3: * - incremental build (from 8.9.beta9, with -j16) OK - tests from ptest-python3 passed, except for 1

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta9 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM: *- python2: * - incremental build (from 8.9.beta8, with -j16) OK - all tests from ptestlong passed - *python3: * - incremental build (from 8.9.beta8, with -j16) OK - tests from ptest-python3 passed, except for

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta8 released

Hi Volker, Le lundi 26 août 2019 00:37:50 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > 40c5efa0c8 Trac #28365: Use something instead of time() to ensure Manifold > uniqueness in tests > Although it appears in the list of 8.9.beta8 merged tickets, #28365 has

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta8 released

On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM: *- python2: * - incremental build (from 8.9.beta4, with -j16) OK - all tests from ptestlong passed - *python3: * - incremental build (from 8.9.beta4, with -j16) OK - tests from ptest-python3 passed, except for 1

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta8 released

Le lundi 26 août 2019 00:37:50 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > > I'm inclined to name the next version 9.0. In particular, we now have > Python 3 support that, while not perfect, is at least usable so we should > mark that with a new major version. Also point-9 is a natural place to > switch.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta7 released

Hello Sebastien, This works for me on Ubuntu 18.04, with both Python 2 and 3 versions of Sage 8.9.beta7. Maybe you should upgrade your SSL? Best regards, Eric. Le vendredi 23 août 2019 14:56:24 UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé a écrit : > > > > I did my upgrade as usual, so I do not know where is the

  1   2   3   >