The original pull request was merged, so open a new one.
Trac tickets were occasionally reopened but not after
they were merged in a development release.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Congratulations to Volker and to all Sage contributors
on the new release.
2023-05-21 01:00 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> I have created a changelog at
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/releases/tag/10.0
> (automatically generated from the merged PRs by GitHub;
> then lightly edited).
Thanks.
>
2022-04-28 00:55, David Joyner:
>
> This issue was that I just upgraded ubuntu to 21.10
While you are at it, Ubuntu 22.04 is out! --Samuel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
2022-03-12 16:28 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 55a711e3d6 (tag: 9.6.beta5) Updated SageMath version to 9.6.beta5
Thanks Volker for this new release!
Congratulations on clearing the backlog of positively reviewed tickets:
https://trac.sagemath.org/query?milestone=sage-9.6=positive_review
2022-03-08 15:25 UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier:
>
> FWIW, on Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM,
> upgrading 9.6.beta3 to 9.6.beta4 gives me
> one transient failure (already known) :
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 209.2
> --random-seed=31897748386618397374885466269378290605
>
2022-03-03 10:29 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier:
>
> FWIW, I get exactly the same result on another,
> slightly smaller, machine (Debian testing running
> on core i5 + 8 GB RAM) : temporary failure on
> cycliccover_finite_field.py, permanent failure
> on graph.py, (more moderate) overconsumption
> of
2022-03-01 10:00 UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier:
>
> FWIW, on Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM,
> upgrading 9.6.beta1 to 9.6.beta3 and running ptestlong
>gets me one temporary failure :
>
> ... src/sage/schemes/cyclic_covers/cycliccover_finite_field.py # 1 doctest
> failed
>
> and one
2022-02-28 00:37 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 1e8ba0aac4 (tag: 9.6.beta3) Updated SageMath version to 9.6.beta3
Thanks for releasing this new beta version.
On Cygwin, tried `make -j4`, and fpylll failed to build.
Perhaps one dependency is not properly indicated?
Running `make` again gave the
2022-02-20 14:30 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 15c8011dd0 (tag: 9.6.beta2) Updated SageMath version to 9.6.beta2
Thanks for this new release.
On Debian 10 buster, one `make ptestlong` gave "all tests passed"
with seed 180869625321339283697396330889120925058.
However other seeds fail due to:
- Sage
2022-01-30 15:48 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 439907fd9a (tag: 9.5) Updated SageMath version to 9.5
In Cygwin in Windows 10, the build fails for me
on `sagemath_doc_html`, as has been the case
on that machine since Sage 9.5.beta7.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
2022-01-30 15:48 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 439907fd9a (tag: 9.5) Updated SageMath version to 9.5
Andrey Novoseltsev reports issues updating SageCell
to use Sage 9.5:
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-cell/c/ttEhExVQQbk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
2022-01-30 15:48 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 439907fd9a (tag: 9.5) Updated SageMath version to 9.5
Thanks Volker for this new release!
On Debian 10 buster, `make -s V=0 ptestlong` fails on two files:
```
... src/sage/features/interfaces.py # Timed out
... src/sage/game_theory/parser.py # 2 doctests
2022-01-19 00:05 UTC, Volker Braun on sage-release:
>
> 8ea92d580a (tag: 9.5.rc3, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.rc3
Thanks Volker!
On Cygwin: failed to build sagemath_doc_html.
On Debian: failed to build sagemath_doc_html.
See the ticket 0 patchbot report for pascaline at
2022-01-21 16:20 UTC, Sébastien Labbé:
>
> Thanks Volker for the release. My first try at building with configuration.
>
> The relevant part of logs/pkgs/cryptominisat-5.6.8.log is copied below.
Might be solved by:
- Sage Trac ticket #33183:
Better fix installation of cryptominisat and
2022-01-16 17:17 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> f9b2db94f6 (tag: 9.5.rc2, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.rc2
Thanks Volker for this new release candidate.
On Cygwin 3.3.3-1 on Windows 10, build fails for me while trying
to build `sagemath_doc_html-none`, with or without ticket #33078,
as
2022-01-13 23:22 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 3da1b22c25 (tag: 9.5.rc1) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.rc1
Thanks for this new development release.
On an Acer laptop, on Cygwin 3.3.3-1 on Windows 10, two attempts:
- from a freshly downloaded tarball
- from a fresh git clone
Both attempts failed
2022-01-14 21:49 UTC, Sébastien Labbé:
>
> The failures with the following files are new and are copied below:
>
> SEED=115792415560373440200802359516411195501
> alias sagetest="./sage -t --long --random-seed=$SEED"
> sagetest src/sage/databases/findstat.py # 12 doctests failed
> sagetest
2022-01-14 10:00 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:10 AM Eric Gourgoulhon:
> >
> > On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
> > - incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta8, with system python (3.8.10): OK
> > - make ptestlong --> 2 doctests failed in
2022-01-13 20:26 UTC, 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release:
>
>
> > On Jan 9, 2022, at 03:15 , Volker Braun:
> >
> > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> > branch.
> > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> >
2022-01-11 11:31 UTC, Vincent Delecroix on sage-release:
>
> Got a matplotlib related doctest failure in graph plotting
> (via elliptic curves on this example)
Maybe related to this recently opened ticket:
- Sage Trac ticket 33143
Matplotlib update breaks build on debian buster
2022-01-10 19:05, François Bissey on sage-release:
>
> That one is because a recent gain is used
> see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31563
Probably you typed "a recent giac" and some software on
your computer decided to change that into "a recent gain".
--
You received this message because
> On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:53:00 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>>
>> 2022-01-10 04:02 UTC, Matthias Köppe on sage-release:
>> >
>> > On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 3:15:23 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 38323507f6 (tag: 9.5.rc0, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to
>> >>
2022-01-10 04:02 UTC, Matthias Köppe on sage-release:
>
> On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 3:15:23 AM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> 38323507f6 (tag: 9.5.rc0, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.rc0
>
> Thanks, Volker, for preparing the first release candidate.
+1
Here is a failure
2021-12-25 04:59 UTC, Samuel Lelievre on sage-release:
>
> Thanks Dima and Matthias for your feedback.
> I opened three tickets related to my report:
>
> - #33078: Use system Python 3 on Cygwin
> - #33079: Fix python3 build failure on Cygwin
> - #33080: Fix scipy-3.7.2 build failure on Cygwin
>
>
>From a fresh git clone, one of the following two options
is needed to build Sage:
./bootstrap && ./configure && make
make configure && ./configure && make
>From a fresh tarball, the "make configure" is supposed
not to be necessary, as tarballs ship an appropriate
version of configure. You may
Thanks Volker for this new release.
On macOS 10.14.6 Mojave with many packages from
Homebrew: "All tests passed!"
On Cygwin 3.3.3-1 on Windows 10, with many packages:
- Sage 9.5.beta9 fails to build python3-3.9.7 unless
we configure `--with-python3=/usr/bin/python3`
and fails to build
On Cygwin, build failure on sagemath_doc_html-none,
apparently having something to do with Singular.
Details:
https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/slel-2021-11-27-s95b7-cygwin-fail.zip
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To
2021-11-20 10:25 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> cc60cfebc4 (tag: 9.5.beta7) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.beta7
Thanks for this new release!
On Debian 10 buster, using many system packages,
Sage 9.5.beta7 pulled on an existing older develop
built but failed its tests. After `make distclean` though:
Hi,
Regarding the release process, my understanding is Volker works
on a release branch in a different repo; once we see Sage 9.5.beta7 at
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/tags
it can be considered as released. It sometimes takes the announcement
a few hours or a day to get posted by Volker
2021-10-29 21:42 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> f716a0b366 (tag: 9.5.beta5) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.beta5
Thanks for this new release!
On Debian 10 buster, `make -s V=0 ptestlong` resulted in
doctest failures in two files, after a successful build.
The files which had doctest failures are:
-
2021-10-27 13:36 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> 2021-10-19 23:07 UTC, Volker Braun:
> >
> > 056b8d4e7b (tag: 9.5.beta4) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.beta4
>
> Thanks for this new development release!
>
> On Cygwin, SageMath 9.5.beta4 failed to build SciPy.
> I might
2021-10-19 23:07 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 056b8d4e7b (tag: 9.5.beta4) Updated SageMath version to 9.5.beta4
Thanks for this new development release!
On Cygwin, failed to build SciPy.
I might try #32746 which fixes a similar problem on Fedora.
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32746
--
You
2021-09-21 00:10 UTC, William Stein:
>
> The official non-beta OpenSSL 3.0.0 release just happened. Finally!
Upgrading to it is already positively reviewed:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32499
so Sage 9.5 will have it. Yay! --Samuel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
2021-08-22 12:04 UTC, Frédéric Chapoton:
>
> Le dimanche 22 août 2021 à 11:01:33 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
>>
>> The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.5.
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop"
>> git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source
2021-08-12 21:41 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 7282b2b6c6 (trac/develop, tag: 9.4.rc2) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc2
> 79dc8f55f8 Trac #32359: fedora 34: ./configure aborts while checking for
> pari.cfg
> e0cbf2c965 (tag: 9.4.rc1) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc1
Thanks for this new release
Volker Braun:
>
> e0cbf2c965 (tag: 9.4.rc1, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.4.rc1
> 952f7f9006 Trac #31565: Build still non-portable despite SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes
> because of numpy
> 5090d3dab1 Trac #32322: Random failure in projective_ds.py
> a73ad2437f Trac #32142: Implement the
2021-08-09 12:00 UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier:
>
> On Debian testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM,
> upgrading 9.4.rc0 to 9.4.rc1 and running ptestlong
> gives three permanent failures :
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 92.9 --random-seed=0 src/sage/doctest/test.py # 7
> doctests failed
> sage -t
Le sam. 31 juil. 2021 à 01:14, Kenji Iohara:
>
> On my Mac OS 11.5, it compiled perfectly from the first build
> whereas I had some problem ptestlong
> claiming that I don't have Pytest even if
> pytest --version gives me pytest 6.2.4...
Regarding pytest, you probably have it installed
2021-07-23 01:09 UTC, Travis:
>
> If we merge basically all of the tickets with a positive review,
> we probably have enough for a release.
Currently 150 tickets have milestone 9.4 and positive review:
2021-07-19 21:24 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> First results from https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/3099545203
>
> ubuntu trusty xenial bionic focal groovy hirsute impish
> - clean, with timeouts for some variants, and except for doctest failure in
>
2021-06-22 19:52 UTC, 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release:
>
> Built from a fresh clone of the develop tree on macOS 10.13.6
> (2017 iMac Pro, 18-core Xeon W).
> Testing (‘ptestlong’) had one failure:
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 70.4 --random-seed=0
> src/sage/graphs/bipartite_graph.py # 1
Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 21:35, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 18:30, Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > Thanks for the new release.
> >
> > On Debian 10 buster
> > - `./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q` -- ok but lost a lot of quiet
> > - `ma
Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 18:30, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> Thanks for the new release.
>
> On Debian 10 buster
> - `./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q` -- ok but lost a lot of quiet
> - `make -s V=0` -- ok
> - `make -s V=0 doc-pdf` -- ok
> - `make -s V=0 testlong` -- al
Thanks for the new release.
On Debian 10 buster
- `./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q` -- ok but lost a lot of quiet
- `make -s V=0` -- ok
- `make -s V=0 doc-pdf` -- ok
- `make -s V=0 testlong` -- all tests pass
On Ubuntu 20.04:
- `./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q` -- ok but lost a lot of quiet
-
Paul Masson:
>
> Installed xz using Homebrew. Appears to have done the trick. Thanks Volker.
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31915
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
On a colleague's machine:
- iMac with intel i5 processor
- macOS 11
- installing from SageMath 9.3 macOS 11 binary
After downloading and extracting the binary tarball,
running Sage launches the relocation process,
then displays the banner, two syntax warnings,
and the prompt.
```
2021-05-27 14:43 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> On Thu, 27 May 2021, 15:34 Clemens Heuberger,
> wrote:
>>
>> Also on Ubuntu 18.04 (without any optional packages apart ccache installed),
>> I
>> have the failing doctest with graph.py (two out of three runs) and
>> consistently
>>
>> $ ./sage -t
Fixed at
- Sage Trac ticket 31825
Failure when testing sage_conf version
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31825
Also reported at
- https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/MMG9Q-cswyA/m/lH9DCmTiAgAJ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
2021-05-27 12:44 UTC, Sébastien Labbé:
>
> On Ubuntu 18.04, testing with various optional
> and external packages, I obtain:
>
> The other failures are copied below (I am not able
> to see the problem with the first one):
Probably the "period" / "full stop" at the very end.
> ... 292, ...]
>
2021-05-01 à 01:13, Volker Braun:
>
> c27d4d6803 (tag: 9.3.rc5, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 9.3.rc5
Thanks for this new release.
On macOS 10.14.6, using many Homebrew packages,
the build from a working 9.3.rc4 succeeds. Running
make testlong
gives two failing doctests:
```
$
Thanks Volker for the new release and Matthias for the overview
of remaining work.
On macOS 10.14.6 with many Homebrew packages, from an
existing SageMath 9.3.rc0, after the following commands:
```
$ source .homebrew-build-env && ./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q
```
the extraneous configure
Le mer. 24 mars 2021 à 03:14, Matthias Köppe:
>
> We updated Singular. You may have to use "make sagelib-clean"
> to rebuild the Sage library from scratch.
>
> (See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29711 for the issue that
> sagelib does not have proper dependencies on the libraries
> that it
Thanks for this new release.
On macOS 10.14.6 with Homebrew and many packages,
running `make` led to an error while building dochtml.
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/local/Cellar/python@3.9/3.9.2_2/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/runpy.py",
line 188,
2021-03-16 09:24 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> 2021-03-16 01:26 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
> >
> > On Monday, March 15, 2021 at 1:42:44 PM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre:
> >>
> >> On macOS 10.14.6, in a fresh clone, I got this:
> >> ```
> >> $ source .homeb
2021-03-16 01:26 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> On Monday, March 15, 2021 at 1:42:44 PM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre:
>>
>> On macOS 10.14.6, in a fresh clone, I got this:
>> ```
>> $ source .homebrew-build-env
>> $ ./bootstrap -q
>> $ ./configure --enable-download-from-upstream-url -q
>> ./configure: line
2021-03-14 17:53 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 10:48:30 AM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>>
>> 2021-03-13 17:27 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>> > On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 1:00:17 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>> >> On macOS 10.14.6, with Homebrew, failed to build
Thanks for this new release.
On macOS 10.14.6, in a fresh clone, I got this:
```
$ source .homebrew-build-env
$ ./bootstrap -q
$ ./configure --enable-download-from-upstream-url -q
./configure: line 40596: SAGE_SPKG_CONFIGURE_SAGELIB: command not found
configure: WARNING:
2021-03-13 17:27 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 1:00:17 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>>
>> On macOS 10.14.6, with Homebrew, failed to build cysignals-1.10.2.
>>
>> Logs:
>>
>> https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/slel-2021-03-12-s93b8.zip
>
> From your log:
>
> gcc
Thanks for this new release.
On macOS 10.14.6, with Homebrew, failed to build cysignals-1.10.2.
Logs:
https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/slel-2021-03-12-s93b8.zip
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this
2021-02-17 23:06 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 9:51 PM Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > 2021-02-17 12:05 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
> > >
> > > 2021-02-11 15:35 UTC, Dima:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:45 AM Samuel L
2021-02-17 12:05 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> 2021-02-11 15:35 UTC, Dima:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:45 AM Samuel Lelievre:
> > >
> > > 2021-02-08 02:11:22 UTC, Samuel Lelievre:
> > > >
> > > > On macOS 10.14.6 with lots
2021-02-11 15:35 UTC, Dima:
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:45 AM Samuel Lelievre:
> >
> > 2021-02-08 02:11:22 UTC, Samuel Lelievre:
> > >
> > > On macOS 10.14.6 with lots of Homebrew packages,
> > > [failed to build linbox]. Logs:
> > >
> > >
2021-02-07 22:04 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 8453ffb849 (tag: 9.3.beta7, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to
> 9.3.beta7
Thanks for this new release.
On macOS 10.14.6 with lots of Homebrew packages,
I failed to report on beta6 for which cypari2 failed to build;
with beta7, cypari2 now builds
2020-12-28 00:11 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 9d686f22f4 (trac/develop, tag: 9.3.beta5) Updated SageMath version to
> 9.3.beta5
Thanks for this new release. It built fine here:
- macOS 10.14.6 with lots of Homebrew packages installed
- make: ok; make testlong: All tests passed!
whereas for Sage
2020-11-26 23:24 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> the 2nd line should be
>
> locale.setlocale(locale.LC_ALL,'')
>
> (I don't know why you ended up with " instead of '' in the first
> place, probably your keyboard has a setting that automatically
> converts '' into ")
>
> HTML email is evil, too - I think
2020-11-01 19:23 UTC, John H Palmieri:
>
> On Sunday, November 1, 2020 at 7:29:31 AM UTC-8, David Coudert wrote:
>>
>> Surprisingly, I still get the recommendation to run :
>> brew install pandoc ffmpeg imagemagick texinfo
>> So something must be wrong somewhere, but what?
>
> I don't know what's
Added to the Sage 9.1 Release Tour.
Le mar. 6 oct. 2020 à 22:46, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
> We've recovered the settings for getting DOI for Sage releases via
> zenodo, something that was broken for years.
> cf https://zenodo.org/record/4066866
> and this is DOI for Sage 9.1:
2020-10-11 15:44 UTC, Andy Howell:
>
> Ubuntu 20.04 Incremental build OK, tests failed. Did clean rebuild. These
> two failed:
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 55.4 --random-seed=0
> src/sage/interfaces/singular.py # Killed due to segmentation fault
> sage-t --long --warn-long 55.4
Le dim. 11 oct. 2020 à 06:22, Samuel Lelièvre
a écrit :
>
> 2020-10-11 01:49 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
> >
> > Volker, thanks for preparing the new release candidate. Looks like
> > we are converging. But I would hope that we can still get the
> > positively reviewed &qu
2020-10-11 01:49 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> Volker, thanks for preparing the new release candidate. Looks like
> we are converging. But I would hope that we can still get the
> positively reviewed "critical" tickets (only the ones that are marked
> "milestone 9.2") into the release.
That would be
2020-09-11 17:55 UTC, Markus Wageringel:
>
> With a clean build on Ubuntu 20.04, ptestlong passes, but Jupyter
> does not start anymore due to an SSL problem, using Sage's Python 3.
> (The system Python 3.8 is not picked up because of missing
> dependencies sqlite and xz, but that is ok.)
>
>
Thanks for this new development release!
On a MacBook Air (early 2014) with
macOS 10.14.6 Mojave, with Homebrew
(but having removed Homebrew packages
gcc@9, python@3.7, arb, flint, gap, singular),
`make` succeeds but `make testlong` fails
unexpectedly still referring to python@3.7.
For example:
2020-08-02 21:30 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop"
> git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> c353bce995 (tag: 9.2.beta11, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to
2020-08-13 11:35 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> Thanks! On Debian 10, success with `make`, and a few transient
> timeouts and failures for `make testalllong`.
>
> Doctesting these files individually afterwards,
> each of them gave "All tests passed!"
... but that's because
Le mar. 11 août 2020 à 00:51, Volker Braun a écrit :
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop"
> git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Thanks! On Debian 10, success with `make`, and a few
2020-08-13 05:35 UTC, John H Palmieri:
>
> I'm having a problem with this on OS X: both with an incremental
> upgrade (after doing "make doc-clean") and a build from scratch,
> the build hangs during the docbuilding stage.
Same here with this configuration:
- MacBook Air, Early 2014
- macOS
The failures all have to do with the locale.
Do we have a meta-ticket for locale-related problems?
Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 20:16, Kenji Iohara a écrit :
>
> I could compile on Mac OS.10.15.6 without installing gcc@9.
> Make ptestlong gives me an error
>
> --
> You received this message because you
2020-08-01 01:13 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> [...]
> On macOS with Homebrew, `make` finally succeeded.
> [...]
> After that I ran `make testlong` and it started by
> - rebuilding sagelib
> [...]
The result of `make testlong` was: All tests passed!
I then ran `make testa
2020-08-1 01:13 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> Building succeeded on Debian 10. Tests (testlong) succeeded too.
>
> $ make testlong
> All tests passed!
>
> Then I tried
>
> $ make testalllong
>
> and to my surprise it built sagelib and dochtml anew.
>
Building succeeded on Debian 10. Tests (testlong) succeeded too.
$ make testlong
All tests passed!
Then I tried
$ make testalllong
and to my surprise it built sagelib and dochtml anew.
A number of files timed out or had failing doctests,
see further email.
On macOS with Homebrew,
2020-07-31 13:01 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 1:40 PM Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > 2020-07-31 12:29 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
> > >
> > > I guess all of them are actually links to
> > > /usr/local/Cellar/ecl/20.4.24/lib/libecl.20.4.24.
2020-07-31 12:29 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:43 PM Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > 2020-07-31 à 09:58 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
> > >
> > > Do you have another copy of libecl*.dylib or libecl*.so somewhere in
> > > /usr/local ?
> >
2020-07-31 à 09:58 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> Do you have another copy of libecl*.dylib or libecl*.so somewhere in
> /usr/local ?
>
> (or just ecl*.[dylib,so] - I recall at some point the naming was off)
Here is what I have:
```
$ find /usr/local -iname "ecl*.so"
$ find /usr/local -iname
2020-07-30 18:39 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> [manifolds] ImportError:
> dlopen(/opt/s/sage92b6/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/libs/ecl.cpython-37m-darwin.so,
> 2): Symbol not found: _
> ecl_process_env
> [manifolds] Referenced from:
>
2020-07-29 18:13 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
>
> On Wednesday, July 29, 2020 at 4:37:52 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>>
>> The errors seem to involve Flint. I have Flint 2.6.1 from Homebrew.
>>
>> Should I
>> - uninstall Homebrew's flint and try again?
>
> Yes please, so that we can get
> Date: 2020-07-26 00:20 UTC
> From: Volker Braun
> To: sage-release
> Subject: Sage 9.2.beta6 released
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop"
> git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Thanks
> From: Volker Braun
> To: sage-release
> Date: Sat 2020-05-09 10:22 UTC
> Subject: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.rc4 released!
>
>
> Now would be a good time for you to test ;-)
Thanks for this new release. Tested on two systems.
## Debian 9
```
$ make ptestlong
[...]
# Building SageMath 9.1.rc3 on Debian 9
Based on a working Sage 9.1.rc2.
## Configure
```
$ git pull origin develop --tags
[...]
$ make configure
[...]
$ ./configure
[...]
```
The `./configure` step recommends:
```
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get install libboost-dev coinor-cbc
Thu 2020-04-23 à 09:09, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020, 14:55 Samuel Lelievre:
>>
>> > Subject: Sage 9.1.rc1 released
>>
>> On macOS 10.14.6 Mojave with lots of Homebrew
>> packages installed, failed to build Pillow. Logs:
>>
>> https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/sage3logs.zip
>
>
Sat 2020-01-04 17:34 UTC, John Cremona:
>
> Apologies now I see that some of the earlier thread on this topic
> was started by me with similar issues (on a different machine).
> I just don't remember such things these days. The sooner I can
> find someone else to be sysadmin for the 8 or so
Le sam. 28 déc. 2019 à 02:12, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> Computer, OS, build choices:
>
> - iMac, Mid 2015
> - macOS 10.14.6 Mojave
> - build for Python 2
> - build Sage's `gcc` and `openssl` packages
> - build Sage's Python with its `_ssl` and `_tkinter` modules
>
>
On a MacBook Air with macOS 10.14.6 Mojave,
after `git pull origin develop && make` from a
working Sage 9.0.beta10 built for Python 3,
ran `make testlong` and got: "All tests passed!".
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To
Thu 2019-12-26 à 23:24 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> 746a826377 (trac/develop, tag: 9.0.rc0) Updated SageMath version to 9.0.rc0
Computer, OS, build choices:
- iMac, Mid 2015
- macOS 10.14.6 Mojave
- build for Python 2
- build Sage's `gcc` and `openssl` packages
- build Sage's Python with its `_ssl`
Le ven. 27 déc. 2019 à 03:11, Samuel Lelièvre
a écrit :
>
> Le jeu. 26 déc. 2019 à 18:24, Volker Braun:
> >
> > 746a826377 (trac/develop, tag: 9.0.rc0) Updated SageMath version to 9.0.rc0
>
> Please include #28910 in Sage 9.0. It touches no code,
> it's just a badge u
Le jeu. 26 déc. 2019 à 18:24, Volker Braun:
>
> 746a826377 (trac/develop, tag: 9.0.rc0) Updated SageMath version to 9.0.rc0
Please include #28910 in Sage 9.0. It touches no code,
it's just a badge update for DockerHub to show Sage
is maintained as of 2020.
Le jeu. 26 déc. 2019 à 00:28, Samuel Lelièvre:
>
> On one laptop,
> - MacBook Air, Early 2014
> - macOS 10.14.6 Mojave
> - Homebrew installed with many packages
> - "git pull origin develop" from 9.0.beta9
> - "./configure --with-python=3 && mak
Tue 2019-12-24 15:36 UTC, Volker Braun:
>
> I'm thinking this should be the last beta so, so rc0 will be next.
Exciting!
> Happy Holidays everyone!
Happy holidays Volker!
> fcadfadd4e (tag: 9.0.beta10, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to
> 9.0.beta10
On one laptop,
- MacBook Air, Early
I think we should maintain Python2 compatibility at least for this version.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Thanks Dima for your suggestions. Following them,
I installed more cygwin packages, then ran
git pull origin develop
make distclean
make configure
./configure --with-python=3
make -j4
The build, now aiming to build Sage 9.0.beta3,
failed on ecm and glpk. See log files:
-
Le mar. 29 oct. 2019 à 20:41, Isuru Fernando a écrit :
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> Can you open a ticket? Either singular should depend on the python package or
> --without-python should be passed to configure to avoid surprises like this.
>
> Isuru
This is now
- Sage Trac ticket 28676
Clarify
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
