Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.4.beta6 released

I’m unable to compile on macOS 12.7.4 on a fresh clone (and fresh shell).The compilation of fflas_ffpack-2.5.0 is failing. See attached log. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.3.beta2 released

I don’t see these errors on Apple M1 with macOS 12.7.1. > Le 14 déc. 2023 à 17:05, John H Palmieri a écrit : > > On OS X (both Intel and Apple Silicon) I'm getting a lot of new failures, > many of the form "Killed due to alarm": > > sage -t --long

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.3.beta0 released

Issue resolved after upgrading the system to Fedora 39. Thank you. David. > Le 9 déc. 2023 à 21:54, David Coudert a écrit : > > Does not help. > I’ll wait for a system update and let you know. > Best, > David. > >> Le 9 déc. 2023 à 21:20, Matthias Köppe > &l

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.3.beta0 released

Does not help. I’ll wait for a system update and let you know. Best, David. > Le 9 déc. 2023 à 21:20, Matthias Köppe a écrit : > > Try if https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36823 > helps with this > > On Saturday, December 9, 2023 at 8:52:54 AM

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.3.beta0 released

I will ask for an upgrade of the desktop to a newer Fedora (may be 39) and see if this solves the issue. Thanks. David. > Le 9 déc. 2023 à 18:25, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 4:52 PM David Coudert <mailto:david.coud...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.3.beta0 released

Hello, I have a surprising and annoying issue on Fedora 35 with 10.3.beta0 after make distclean sagelib-clean make build ./sage -i bliss tdlib benzene buckygen cryptominisat dot2tex glucose gap_packages mcqd plantri csdp python_igraph When I start sage in a console, I see some warnings:

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.2.rc2 released

I’ll call for more help if not ;) Thank you for all the work Volker. Best, David. > Le 13 nov. 2023 à 16:12, Volker Braun a écrit : > > Sorry for the confusion, hopefully the erroneous script is now fixed ;) > > On Monday, November 13, 2023 at 2:30:18 PM UTC+1 david@gmail.com >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.2.rc2 released

nov. 2023 à 14:49, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 1:30 PM David Coudert <mailto:david.coud...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> Yesterday I have synchronized my fork on GitHub with 10.2.rc2 and it went >> well, but today I see that « This branch i

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.2.rc2 released

Hello, Yesterday I have synchronized my fork on GitHub with 10.2.rc2 and it went well, but today I see that « This branch is 1 commit ahead, 1 commit behind sagemath:develop » O_o. See https://github.com/dcoudert/sage/ It seems that I have to resolve that manually, but I’m not sure how. I

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.2.rc1 released

> I just corrected a mistake, so if your head commit is not e349b002499 then > please reset. Can anyone explain me the proper procedure to do that ? Should I reset head in the branch develop and then force push to the develop branch of my GitHub clone ? I’m not a git / GitHub expert.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.2.beta7 released

> Le 17 oct. 2023 à 12:54, Emmanuel Charpentier > a écrit : > > On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, upgrading (awkwardly, see > above) 10.2.beta6 to 10.2.beta7 and running ptestlong gives me one transient > failure : > > sage -t --long --warn-long 214.7 >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.1.beta5 released

Thanks for this release. After incremental update on fedora 35, I had the following doctest errors. sage -t --long --random-seed=152397713735156567863222915477684656337 src/sage/graphs/generic_graph.py # 15 doctests failed sage -t --long --random-seed=152397713735156567863222915477684656337

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.1.beta1 released

Same for me on OSX. > Le 28 mai 2023 à 22:10, John H Palmieri a écrit : > > On OS X: after running `./configure`, I see > > % git status > On branch develop > Your branch is up to date with 'upstream/develop'. > > Untracked files: > (use "git add ..." to include in what will be committed) >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8.beta7 released

;> > >> is XCode up to date? >> >> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023, 15:04 David Coudert, > > wrote: >> And here is file sagely-9.8.beta7.log (zipped) >> Best, >> David. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscrib

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8.beta7 released

I have Xcode 14.2. > Le 20 janv. 2023 à 16:19, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > is XCode up to date? > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023, 15:04 David Coudert, <mailto:david.coud...@gmail.com>> wrote: > And here is file sagely-9.8.beta7.log (zipped) > Best, > David. >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8.beta4 released

This is again the MILP formulation of `edge_disjoint_spanning_trees`. We now have a fast combinatorial algorithm (Roskind-Tarjan). We have not removed the MILP formulation to be able to check the validity of the result, but it frequently causes doctests errors. May be it’s time to remove it for

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8.beta3 released

But I have for instance plantri installed and we have doctests marked # optional plantri Same for python_igraph, etc. So it should not be well recorded. > Le 1 nov. 2022 à 12:06, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > > > However, I don’t understand the difference between the list of features to be >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8.beta3 released

Build and passes make ptestlong on macOS 12.6.1 M1. However, I don’t understand the difference between the list of features to be detected (indicated before running the tests) and the list of detected features (indicated after doctesting). Features to be detected:

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.8.beta2 released

Incremental update went well for me on both fedora 35 and macOS 12.5.1 (intel cpu). For the record, I had to do a distclean some weeks ago on macOS but not on fedora. May be it helps me. David. > Le 18 oct. 2022 à 10:15, 'tsc...@ucdavis.edu' via sage-release > a écrit : > > I am not able

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta8 released

Thank you for letting me know. Let’s hope it will be included soon. > Le 8 août 2022 à 15:03, Marc Culler a écrit : > > This is fixed in ticket #34221 . > Cython 2.9 does not find .pxd files in directories which do not contain an > __init__.py file,

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta8 released

Hello,Incremental update fails on sage_numerical_backends_cplex-9.0b12I tried make distclean && make && sage -i sage_numerical_backends_cplex. but it fails again :(The main issue is:=  Error compiling Cython file:    ...  from

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta7 released

And also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22349 Deprecate sorting of Graph vertices and edges by default This ticket touches many files and so can lead to conflicts. Best, David. > Le 3 août 2022 à 13:33, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > > It would make a sense to release sage beta8 quickly that just

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta7 released

; One can turn it off by running ./configure > > > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, 18:13 David Coudert, <mailto:david.coud...@gmail.com>> wrote: > With this new beta, I see that the source code and the compiled code are > mixed. > For instance > sapristi:sage dcouder

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta7 released

With this new beta, I see that the source code and the compiled code are mixed. For instance sapristi:sage dcoudert$ ll src/sage/graphs/ total 76264 drwxr-xr-x 123 dcoudert coati 3936 2 aoû 16:10 . drwxr-xr-x 69 dcoudert coati 2208 1 aoû 23:18 .. drwxr-xr-x 19 dcoudert coati

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta4 released

Working properly again after distclean. Sorry for the noise. > Le 10 juil. 2022 à 12:54, David Coudert a écrit : > > I tried, but I still get the same issue. > I will try with a make distclean. > > >> Le 10 juil. 2022 à 11:27, Dima Pasechnik > <mail

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta4 released

I tried, but I still get the same issue. I will try with a make distclean. > Le 10 juil. 2022 à 11:27, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > > > On Sun, 10 Jul 2022, 09:43 david@gmail.com , > mailto:david.coud...@gmail.com>> wrote: > on MacOS 12.3.1 with Xcode 13.4.1

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta3 released

The doc builds properly for me on macOS 12.3.1 David. > Le 24 juin 2022 à 10:50, 'tsc...@ucdavis.edu' via sage-release > a écrit : > > Is anyone else seeing docbuilding issues? I am getting > > [sagemath_doc_html-none] __import__(module_name) > [sagemath_doc_html-none]

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta2 released

to complain. Thank you for your help, David. > Le 15 juin 2022 à 15:07, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:42 PM David Coudert wrote: >> >> I don’t have /usr/local/lisp at all. >> Should I (try to) install it ? > > no, this should not be

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta2 released

Sagemath is quite long on a MacBook Air. Best, David. > Le 15 juin 2022 à 15:07, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:42 PM David Coudert <mailto:david.coud...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I don’t have /usr/local/lisp at all

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta2 released

Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 11:02 AM David Coudert <mailto:david.coud...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> attached. > > > ;;; Loading > "/Users/dcoudert/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/maxima-5.45.0.p0/src/src/../lisp-utils/defsystem.lisp" > ;;; Loading #P"

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta2 released

and Marius Gerbershagen ECL is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; see file 'Copyright' for details. Type :h for Help. Top level in: #. > (+ 2 2) 4 > Le 15 juin 2022 à 09:51, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:26 AM D

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta2 released

I have issues compiling this release. I have openblas 0.3.20 installed with homebrew, but sage searches for 0.3.19.laptop: Macbook air (Intel) with macOS 12.3.1sapristi:sage dcoudert$ gcc --versionConfigured with: --prefix=/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr

Re: [sage-release] Github changes

I experienced the same issue and did git clone https://github.com/sagemath/sage.git . It’s working fine now. Git trac is still working well so far. David. > Le 11 janv. 2022 à 22:08, 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release > a écrit : > > > >> On Jan 11,

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta9 released

I have not experienced what you report. On macOS 10.15.7, I’m always doing: ./bootstrap source .homebrew-build-env ./configure make Best, David. > Le 5 janv. 2022 à 05:10, John H Palmieri a écrit : > > I am having intermittent problems building Sage on OS X from a fresh tarball: > it's

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta8 released

Thanks for this new beta release. Can we have most of the positively reviewed tickets included in the final release ? We have currently around 90 tickets with positive review.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta2 released

After distclean, I just did ./boostrap source .homebrew-build-env ./configure make build I have also install lumpy with homebrew but it is apparently not taken into account. So I think I did nothing unusual. David. > Le 21 juin 2021 à 14:38, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > > Please see

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta2 released

So I think I have to wait (and try to go back to previous beta). Thanks, David. > Le 20 juin 2021 à 17:46, Matthias Köppe a écrit : > > Related to this is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31565 > > On Sunday, June 20, 2021 at 12:34:51 AM UTC-7 david@gmail.com wrote: > Thank you for this

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta2 released

prevent this. make[1]: *** [all-build] Error 1 make: *** [build] Error 2 > Le 20 juin 2021 à 11:03, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > maybe also > > make sagelib-clean > > before > > make build > > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:03 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: &g

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta5 released

of fplll in /usr/local > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, 11:54 David Coudert, <mailto:david.coud...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hello, > > On macOS 10.15.7 and fedora 32, I have an error compiling fpylll-0.5.4. See > attached log file. > > This is apparently non blocking to finalize

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta5 released

Hello,On macOS 10.15.7 and fedora 32, I have an error compiling fpylll-0.5.4. See attached log file.This is apparently non blocking to finalize the compilation of 9.3.beta5. I can run it.Best wishes,David. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta4 released

gt;> AC_MSG_WARN([using system pari and unable to locate pari.cfg]) >> >> in >> >> build/pkgs/gp2c/spkg-configure.m4 >> >> and try again? >> (starting with ./bootstrap) >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:28 AM David Cou

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta4 released

Thanks, it works. > Le 15 déc. 2020 à 11:07, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:42 AM David Coudert wrote: >> >> Another issue (this time on masOS 10.15.7): it seems that >> libsemigroups-1.0.9 is not present on mirrors. > > it's probabl

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta4 released

ue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:32 AM David Coudert <david.coud...@gmail.com> wrote:I’m unable to upgrade from 9.3.beta3 on fedora 32.It fails during bootstrap. See attached file.Thank you for your help.David.--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta4 released

Another issue (this time on masOS 10.15.7): it seems that libsemigroups-1.0.9 is not present on mirrors. make --no-print-directory libsemigroups-no-deps sage-logger -p 'SAGE_CHECK=no sage-spkg libsemigroups-1.0.9' '/Users/dcoudert/sage/logs/pkgs/libsemigroups-1.0.9.log' [libsemigroups-1.0.9]

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta4 released

I’m unable to upgrade from 9.3.beta3 on fedora 32.It fails during bootstrap. See attached file.Thank you for your help.David. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta0 released

> Le 2 nov. 2020 à 22:38, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > > > On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, 21:36 David Coudert, <mailto:david.coud...@gmail.com>> wrote: > So should we open a ticket to add it and hope it will be included in next > beta or is there a trick to force the i

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta0 released

So should we open a ticket to add it and hope it will be included in next beta or is there a trick to force the installation of giac ? > Le 2 nov. 2020 à 22:03, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:25 PM David Coudert wrote: >> >> For some reason, giac h

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta0 released

5.0.87p2.p1/inst/Users/dima/sage/local/include/giac' > > and building works. > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 6:35 PM David Coudert wrote: >> >> >> Le 2 nov. 2020 à 16:34, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : >> >> >> >> On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, 14:58 David Coudert, wrote: &

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta0 released

> Le 2 nov. 2020 à 16:34, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > > > On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, 14:58 David Coudert, <mailto:david.coud...@gmail.com>> wrote: > so the main issue now is to recover giac.h > > rebuild after distclean ? > > at least I was able to buil

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta0 released

so the main issue now is to recover giac.h > Le 2 nov. 2020 à 10:29, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:06 AM David Coudert wrote: >> >> I don’t know if Python 3.9 is default forhome-brew or not, but looking back >> at the result of command &q

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta0 released

22:30, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > Sage can use system Python 3.9 in theory, but this is only mildly tested, and > is not tested on macOS, I think. > > is the default Python on Homebrew 3.9 now? > > > > On Sun, 1 Nov 2020, 15:29 David Coudert, <mailto:david.coud...@gm

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta0 released

Hello, No, I don’t find giac.h in my system (find / -name "giac.h"). > Le 1 nov. 2020 à 22:47, Matthias Köppe a écrit : > > On Sunday, November 1, 2020 at 7:29:31 AM UTC-8, David Coudert wrote: > I’m unable to build beta0 on macOS 10.15.7 :( > > I did: > $

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta0 released

Hello, I’m unable to build beta0 on macOS 10.15.7 :( I did: $ make distclean $ ./bootstrap $ source .homebrew-build-env $ ./configure Then, I followed the recommandation and did: $ brew install pandoc ffmpeg imagemagick texinfo $ ./config.status --recheck && ./config.status Surprisingly, I

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

The traces of fortran 9 (and actually gcc 9) are due to .homebrew-build-env. which contains: for l in "gcc@9/lib/gcc/9"; do if [ -d "$HOMEBREW/opt/$l" ]; then LIBRARY_PATH="$HOMEBREW/opt/$l:$LIBRARY_PATH" fi done > Le 9 sept. 2020 à 17:01, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > ok,

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

> Le 9 sept. 2020 à 12:04, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:49 AM David Coudert <mailto:david.coud...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> If I understand well, I’m facing the case (not completely sure): >> homebrew-macos-python3_xcode-gcc_sp

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

If I understand well, I’m facing the case (not completely sure): homebrew-macos-python3_xcode-gcc_spkg-{minimal,standard}: Various build errors (ignore for Sage 9.2) That is: macOS 10.15.6 with clang version 11.0.3 (clang-1103.0.32.62) and all recommended packages installed with homebrew, and

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

ibility version 15.0.0, >> current version 15.0.0) >> /usr/local/opt/gmp/lib/libgmpxx.4.dylib (compatibility version 11.0.0, >> current version 11.0.0) >> /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version >> 1281.100.1) >> /usr/local/opt/openblas/li

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

) /usr/local/opt/openblas/lib/libopenblas.0.dylib (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0) > Le 8 sept. 2020 à 10:14, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:22 AM David Coudert wrote: >> >> I have several issues on macOS 10.15.6 >&

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

I have several issues on macOS 10.15.6I first tried to do incremental upgrade. The compilation completed, but then I realized that I was still with Python 3.7…So I tried "make python3-clean » and then ./configure and make again but it fails. After a make distclean, the compilation failed in the

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

was it incremental build (and from which beta) or fresh build ? > Le 20 août 2020 à 02:55, Kenji Iohara a écrit : > > I have Mac OS X.15.6. I could compile it with no problem, > but I had some errors running ptestlong > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

incremental upgrade from 9.2.beta8 on macOS 10.14.6 - build OK - docbuild OK however, a non blocking error with sagetex: [sagetex-3.4] Successfully built sagetex [sagetex-3.4] Installing collected packages: sagetex [sagetex-3.4] Created temporary directory:

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta8 released

Same here on a fresh clone with macOS 10.15.16 [dochtml] Building en/constructions. [dochtml] [dochtml] [construct] building [html]: targets for 16 source files that are out of date [dochtml] [construct] updating environment: [new config] 16 added, 0 changed, 0 removed ^C[dochtml] Error

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta8 released

macOS Mojave 10.14.6 macbook air early 2014 with core i7 1.7GHz > Le 13 août 2020 à 10:55, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > different versions of macOS? > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 8:36 AM David Coudert wrote: >> >> on my side, incremental build from beta7 (incl

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta8 released

on my side, incremental build from beta7 (including documentation) on OSX went well. > Le 13 août 2020 à 07:35, John H Palmieri a écrit : > > I'm having a problem with this on OS X: both with an incremental upgrade > (after doing "make doc-clean") and a build from scratch, the build hangs >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta6 released

Incremental build OK on macOS 10.14.6 Mojave with Homebrew. may be some .configure has not been executed for you ? David. > Le 26 juil. 2020 à 21:34, Samuel Lelièvre a écrit > : > >> Date: 2020-07-26 00:20 UTC >> From: Volker Braun >> To: sage-release >> Subject: Sage 9.2.beta6 released >> >>

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta5 released

incremental upgrade from 9.2.beta4 to beta5 on macOS with LANG set by default to fr_FR.UTF-8. Everything is fine. Best, David. > Le 13 juil. 2020 à 10:13, Thierry Dumont a écrit > : > > Upgrading from from 9.2 beta4 to beta 5 on my Ubuntu 20-04 with: > > export MAKE="make -j4" > and: >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta4 released

upgrade and docbuid OK from beta3 on macOS. Thank you. David. > Le 9 juil. 2020 à 13:24, Emmanuel Charpentier > a écrit : > > On Debian testing running on core i5 + 8 GB Ram, after upgrading from > 9.2.beta2 to 9.2.beta4, ptestlong gives results identical to those already > reported for

Re: [sage-release] Re: Upgrading to Sage 9.2.beta2. Pb in doc.

same issue here on macOS after upgrading from beta1 > Le 27 juin 2020 à 14:16, Emmanuel Charpentier > a écrit : > > Rebuilding afresh (after make-distclean) didn't work either. make fails with > errors suspiciously similar to the first attempt during documentation > building. > > Enclosed

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta0 released

Some tickets merged in 9.2.beta0 are not marked as closed: 29639, 29645, 29652, 29656 ,29658, 29661, 29664, 29673. See for instance https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29656 or https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29660 Le jeudi 28 mai 2020 23:14:41 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > > As always, you

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.rc0 released

For the version of Python 3 used during conflation, ./configure, says - Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG python3... checking whether any of sqlite libpng bzip2 xz libffi is installed as or will be installed

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.rc0 released

> Le 15 avr. 2020 à 11:27, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > Do you have readline installed in Homebrew? yes confetti:sage dcoudert$ ls /usr/local/opt/ 0mqecmgtslibjpeg o-caml r alluxioflint

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.beta4 released

vironment variable SAGE_KEEP_BUILT_SPKGS=yes to prevent this. make: *** [Makefile:33: mcqd] Error 1 > Le 14 févr. 2020 à 14:46, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > how about > > ./sage -f mcqd > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 1:08 PM David Coudert wrote: >> >> incremental bui

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.beta4 released

incremental build from 9.1.beta3 failed on mccd on a linux fedora 28 computer. Don’t know what to do (and hope to avoid distclean). Let me know if more informations is needed. Best, David. …. [rpy2-2.8.2.p1] user0m6.064s [rpy2-2.8.2.p1] sys 0m1.100s [rpy2-2.8.2.p1] Copying package files

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.beta1 released

h uses a system pygments, > I see the same lex literal_block as "python" Warning with pygments-2.5.2. But > pygments-2.4.2 is fine. > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2020 at 9:32:52 AM UTC-6, David Coudert wrote: > sage: import sphinx > sage: sphinx.version_info > (2, 3, 1,

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.beta1 released

etimes cause spurious [dochtml] error messages. To be certain that these are real errors, run [dochtml] "make doc-clean" first and try again. make[3]: *** [doc-html] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-start] Error 2 > Le 22 janv. 2020 à 11:01, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Wed, J

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.beta1 released

> Le 22 janv. 2020 à 10:27, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:53 AM David Coudert <mailto:david.coud...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I cannot build the doc, even after a doc-clean. >> >> >> cd ../.. && sage-logger

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.beta1 released

I cannot build the doc, even after a doc-clean. cd ../.. && sage-logger -p './sage --docbuild --no-pdf-links all html ' logs/dochtml.log [dochtml] [dochtml] Building reference manual, first pass. [dochtml] [dochtml] [reference] Sphinx v2.3.1 en cours d'exécution [dochtml] [reference]

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta8 released

You may check whether ticket 28818 fixes the failures for src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py > Le 2 déc. 2019 à 19:01, Emmanuel Charpentier > a écrit : > > On a slightly larger machine (Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, > slightly different packages), ptestalllong gets 9

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta6 released

After a distclean, I successfully compiled 9.0.beta6 on a (old) linux fedora 28 machine. Although I have set SAGE_ROOT, the compilation shows [sagelib-9.0.beta6] cd . && export\ [sagelib-9.0.beta6] SAGE_ROOT=/doesnotexist \

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta5 released

Some tickets included in this release are still marked as « positive review » on trac. See for instance https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28195 Is it normal ? > Le 3 août 2019 à 13:56, Volker Braun a écrit : > > As always, you can get the latest beta

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta0 released

ntinue to build... > > Vincent > > Le 03/07/2019 à 14:07, David Coudert a écrit : >> I can build successfully with Python2 >> With Python3 I have a build error with pplpy. >> See attached log file >> I have not tried a distclean and would prefer to avoid that

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta0 released

u can try to install (or reinstall) cython > and then continue to build... > > Vincent > > Le 03/07/2019 à 14:07, David Coudert a écrit : >> I can build successfully with Python2 >> With Python3 I have a build error with pplpy. >> See attached log file >> I have not tried

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta0 released

I can build successfully with Python2With Python3 I have a build error with pplpy.See attached log fileI have not tried a distclean and would prefer to avoid that…Thank you for your help,David. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.rc0 released

ith the openblas upgrade, > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27847 > > <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27847>. > > > > I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27961 > > <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27961> (not that I know how to fix it...

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.rc0 released

crash with both python 2 and python 3 on osX. I attach the crash report with python 3.Any help is more than welcome.David.=confetti:sage dcoudert$ ./sage┌┐│ SageMath version 8.8.rc0, Release Date: 2019-06-09                 ││

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.beta4 released

have you tried updating your gurobi license, or removing it from your sage install ? > Le 6 mai 2019 à 09:44, Sébastien Labbé a écrit : > > On Ubuntu 16.04, upgrading to most recent sage develop as usual, I can't get > the documentation to build. I can reproduce the issue after make

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.beta4 released

-t --long src/sage/graphs/generic_graph.py # 8 doctests failed > sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/graph_database.py # 1 doctest failed > > and not the many failures you talk about. > > The best way to round is to use n(...) > > Frederic > > Le samedi 4 mai 2019 19

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.beta4 released

Hello, this release induces many new doctests failures (more than 50) in the graph module with Python3, all related to round. For instance: ┌┐ │ SageMath version 8.8.beta4, Release Date: 2019-05-04 │ │ Using

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.beta0 released

Thank you. It’s working now. > Le 31 mars 2019 à 10:59, Volker Braun a écrit : > > thanks, fixed! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-release" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.beta0 released

unable to download optional packages igraph and python_igraph that have been updated in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27502 …. [igraph-0.7.1999] ERROR [transfer|run:135]: [Errno 404] Not Found: '//sagepad.org/spkg/upstream/igraph/igraph-0.7.1999.tar.gz' [igraph-0.7.1999]

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.rc0 released

I have not tried your solution as I run `make distclean` before. Problem solved. Thank you for the help, David. > Le 20 mars 2019 à 19:21, John H Palmieri a écrit : > > > > On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 9:17:37 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > so you need to rebuild sagelib with new

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7.rc0 released

I have a crash when starting sage :( Roughly it says "ImportError: libvpx.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory" See the content of .sage/ipython-5.0.0/Sage_crash_report.txt below This is on a computer freshly updated to fedora 29, where we have libvpx.so.5

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.4.beta0 released

I had the same issue on fedora 28 and osx, but I think it’s only a matter of order in which stuff are compiled. I have repeated “make build -j16” several times (3-4) since it was each time progressing, and it finally completed the compilation (without distclean). I have not tried “make -j1”,