Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-06-04 Thread 'axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release
Thank you so much! (reason is a FPSAC 23 software demo, which contains a link to the doc) Best wishes, Martin On Sunday, 4 June 2023 at 12:47:45 UTC+2 harald@gmail.com wrote: > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 9:35 AM 'axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release < > sage-r...@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >>

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-06-04 Thread 'axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release
Would it be possible to update the documentation on sagemath.org? It seems that it is still 9.8. On Monday, 22 May 2023 at 15:24:44 UTC+2 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote: > Wups ! Incorrect link to the Jupyter kernel problem. See rather here >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-22 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Wups ! Incorrect link to the Jupyter kernel problem. See rather here … Sorry for the noise… ​ Le lundi 22 mai 2023 à 15:19:49 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > On a slightly larger machine (core i7 + 16 GB

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-22 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
On a slightly larger machine (core i7 + 16 GB RAM, Debian testing) with more optional packages installed, I get : - Two transient failures (timeouts) : sage -t --long --warn-long 220.0 --random-seed=70054243461324019656106910472128436065 src/sage/rings/tests.py # Timed out sage -t

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-22 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
FWIW, on Debian testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM, upgrading 10.0.rc2 to 10.0 passes ptestlong with no failures (transient nor permanent). Yay ! HTH, Le dimanche 21 mai 2023 à 01:10:07 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-10.0. As always, you

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-21 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 1:18:09 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Sun, 21 May 2023, 19:37 Matthias Köppe, wrote: On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 5:44:35 AM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre wrote: > - I will no longer create a text version > of the changelog in the traditional format (e.g. >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sun, 21 May 2023, 19:37 Matthias Köppe, wrote: > On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 5:44:35 AM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > > - I will no longer create a text version > > of the changelog in the traditional format (e.g. > > https://www.sagemath.org/changelogs/sage-9.8.txt), > > as it provides no

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-21 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 5:44:35 AM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre wrote: > - I will no longer create a text version > of the changelog in the traditional format (e.g. > https://www.sagemath.org/changelogs/sage-9.8.txt), > as it provides no added value. I strongly disagree with "as it provides no

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-21 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 5:44:35 AM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre wrote: 2023-05-21 01:00 UTC, Matthias Köppe: > > I have created a changelog at > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/releases/tag/10.0 > (automatically generated from the merged PRs by GitHub; > then lightly edited). Thanks. > Some

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
This is now https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35659 On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 2:33 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > probably, related to > https://github.com/citation-file-format/citation-file-format/issues/374 > > On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 1:58 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > something is again

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
probably, related to https://github.com/citation-file-format/citation-file-format/issues/374 On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 1:58 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > something is again off with the DOI records for Sagemath, the latest > is still shown as 9.7. > Also,

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-21 Thread Dima Pasechnik
something is again off with the DOI records for Sagemath, the latest is still shown as 9.7. Also, https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/develop/CITATION.cff is off, and still refers to 9.5. (sorry, I didn't check this for 9.8) Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-21 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Congratulations to Volker and to all Sage contributors on the new release. 2023-05-21 01:00 UTC, Matthias Köppe: > > I have created a changelog at > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/releases/tag/10.0 > (automatically generated from the merged PRs by GitHub; > then lightly edited). Thanks. >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-20 Thread Matthias Köppe
Thanks for preparing the release! I have created a changelog at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/releases/tag/10.0 (automatically generated from the merged PRs by GitHub; then lightly edited). Some notes: - The list of "New Contributors" was also automatically generated by GitHub. It did not

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0 released

2023-05-20 Thread Kwankyu Lee
Congratulations! On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 8:10:07 AM UTC+9 Volker Braun wrote: The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-10.0. As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at