Forcing the reinstallation of cvxopt (sage -f cvxopt ; make -j8) allowed
all the failed tests to pass without failure.
I still do not have any explanation for the initial cvxopt failure…
HTH,
Le mercredi 13 décembre 2023 à 18:43:27 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a
écrit :
> Missing text of
Missing text of the previous message, (mysteriously missing...) :
On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM,
upgrading 10.2.rc4 to 10.3.beta1 and running ptestlong gives a
non-negligible list of permanent failures :
```
As indicated on the e-antic PR, this prevents normaliz from working. So
this is blocking a number of optional packages, and it would be great if
this could be resolved quickly.
Best,
Travis
On Wednesday, December 13, 2023 at 3:44:20 AM UTC+9 vdelecroix wrote:
> e-antic is indeed not
e-antic is indeed not compatible (yet) with flint-3.0.0, see
https://github.com/flatsurf/e-antic/issues/263
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 08:32, 'tsc...@ucdavis.edu' via sage-release
wrote:
>
> I am having an issue building e_antic that was not present for building 10.2
> from source. I've included
Thanks for the release.
On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
- parallel build (-j16) from a fresh git clone + pull develop, with system
python (3.10.12): OK
- make ptestlong gave a single error:
sage -t --long --random-seed=676542016572831857751872562668780748
e-antic doesn't support flint 3 yet
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35848#issuecomment-1841661819
https://github.com/flatsurf/e-antic/pull/264
El martes, 12 de diciembre de 2023 a las 8:32:16 UTC+1, tsc...@ucdavis.edu
escribió:
I am having an issue building e_antic that was not present
I am having an issue building e_antic that was not present for building
10.2 from source. I've included the log file below. I first tried without
installing anything extra and then with a system libantic installation.
Both resulted in the same log file.
Best,
Travis
Using cached file
See: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36859
Volker, it would be appreciated if you include this in beta2.
Is it possible that your merge script somehow takes priority into account,
not just pr number?
Having a broken release is inconvenient for development.
Best,
Gonzalo
On Monday,
On Monday, December 11, 2023 at 7:59:38 AM UTC-8 Antonio Rojas wrote:
Is 'sagemath-pari' actually a thing? I can't find any other mention to it
in the sage source.
Not yet. https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35095 adds it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Fixed in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36859
On Monday, December 11, 2023 at 7:59:38 AM UTC-8 Antonio Rojas wrote:
> On my distro, sagelib-only build, the new file
> 'src/sage/libs/pari/convert_sage_matrix.pyx' is not being cythonized or
> built. This causes major breakage, with many
On my distro, sagelib-only build, the new file
'src/sage/libs/pari/convert_sage_matrix.pyx' is not being cythonized or
built. This causes major breakage, with many
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'sage.libs.pari.convert_sage_matrix'
errors. The first line of the file
# sage_setup:
11 matches
Mail list logo
