Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta13 released

2020-09-21 Thread John H Palmieri
On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 10:32:05 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > For openblas and readline, I suggest using homebrew's versions of those > packages. For symmetrica, there is an upgrade at > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29061 which seems to fix the problem. > For scipy (which

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta13 released

2020-09-21 Thread John H Palmieri
For openblas and readline, I suggest using homebrew's versions of those packages. For symmetrica, there is an upgrade at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29061 which seems to fix the problem. For scipy (which you probably haven't reached in your build and which will probably fail when you do),

[sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta13 released

2020-09-21 Thread Volker Braun
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Again, if there is anything that should be merged in this beta cycle then a positively-reviewed patch has to

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

2020-09-21 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le lundi 21 septembre 2020 04:40:57 UTC+2, Matthias Köppe a écrit : > > On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 10:05:59 AM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre > wrote: > >> [...] what we should do about it is probably adapt the wording >> to better convey that. For instance: >> >> hint: installing the