Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta9 released

2023-11-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:13 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 12:47 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > I've opened https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36624 to deal with it > As I wrote on the issue above, here we get very small primes for the > RSA, 37 and 2, and > in

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta9 released

2023-11-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 12:47 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I've opened https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36624 to deal with it As I wrote on the issue above, here we get very small primes for the RSA, 37 and 2, and in particular 2 is probably breaking something in the implementation. > > On

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta9 released

2023-11-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I've opened https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36624 to deal with it On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 12:32 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I've added > > --- a/src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py > +++ b/src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py > @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ sage: def rsa(bits): > : phi_n = (p-1)

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta9 released

2023-11-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I've added --- a/src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py +++ b/src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ sage: def rsa(bits): : phi_n = (p-1) * (q-1) : while True: : e = ZZ.random_element(1,phi_n) +: print("e=", e) : if gcd(e,phi_n) ==

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta9 released

2023-11-01 Thread david....@gmail.com
I'm seeing a new random failure on both MacOS and Fedora 35. The test passes with other random seeds. sage -t --warn-long 33.1 --random-seed=119293255820329071348175335411518596036 src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py ** File

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta9 released

2023-10-31 Thread John H Palmieri
I'm seeing one new failure on two different OS X machines (one Intel, one M2): File "src/sage/tests/books/computational-mathematics-with-sagemath/mpoly_doctest.py", line 398, in sage.tests.books.computational-mathematics-with-sagemath.mpoly_doctest Failed example:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta9 released

2023-10-31 Thread John H Palmieri
I'm seeing one new failure: File "src/sage/tests/books/computational-mathematics-with-sagemath/mpoly_doctest.py", line 398, in sage.tests.books.computational-mathematics-with-sagemath.mpoly_doctest Failed example: [CDF['x'](p(y=ys[0][0])).roots() for p in J.gens()] # abs tol 2e-15

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta9 released

2023-10-31 Thread Volker Braun
looks like the upload hit a network error, tarball is on the way to the mirrors now On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 6:29:38 PM UTC+1 John H Palmieri wrote: > I don't see this yet on any mirrors. > > On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 5:22:19 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > >> As always, you can get

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta9 released

2023-10-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 5:29 PM John H Palmieri wrote: > > I don't see this yet on any mirrors. one can always use https://github.com/sagemath/sage/archive/refs/tags/10.2.beta9.tar.gz (this is unconfigured source, though, i.e. it would need ./bootstrap to be run) > > On Monday, October 30, 2023

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta9 released

2023-10-31 Thread John H Palmieri
I don't see this yet on any mirrors. On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 5:22:19 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > >