[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc1 released

2023-11-11 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
FWIW, on Debian testing r GB RAM, upgading 10.2.beta9 to 10.2.rc1 and running ptestlong results in one permanent failure : sage -t --long --warn-long 291.5 --random-seed=166120603893570771975522737524674489931 src/sage/functions/special.py # 2 doctests failed And, BTW, using view() from a

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc1 released

2023-11-11 Thread John H Palmieri
A better link for the 3rd and 4th failures is #36631 (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36631). On Saturday, November 11, 2023 at 9:52:26 AM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote: > On OS X Intel, looks good. Four doctest failures, all of which have been > reported: > > sage -t --long

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc1 released

2023-11-11 Thread John H Palmieri
Same on OS X Apple M2 chip. In both this and the earlier case, I ran `./configure` — no need to do `./configure --with-system-gfortran=no`. On Saturday, November 11, 2023 at 9:52:26 AM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote: > On OS X Intel, looks good. Four doctest failures, all of which have been >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc1 released

2023-11-11 Thread John H Palmieri
On OS X Intel, looks good. Four doctest failures, all of which have been reported: sage -t --long --random-seed=120467112235779717922036180522489127126 src/sage/libs/giac/__init__.py # Timed out sage -t --long --random-seed=120467112235779717922036180522489127126