Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-05-07 Thread Erik Bray
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 10:21 PM, wrote: > On Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 7:11:52 AM UTC-7, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> >> Given such a branch to work in, it becomes less "urgent" to finish a >> release since it no longer needs to block normal development progress. >> Of course, you

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-05-05 Thread nbruin
On Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 7:11:52 AM UTC-7, Erik Bray wrote: > > > Given such a branch to work in, it becomes less "urgent" to finish a > release since it no longer needs to block normal development progress. > Of course, you still don't want to spend forever getting a release > out, but

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-26 Thread Erik Bray
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2018-04-26 12:29, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> But I'm told that's somehow impossible for Sage. > > > I don't think that it's fundamentally impossible. But it would require > changes to certain tools. For example, which

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-26 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2018-04-26 11:16, fchapot...@gmail.com wrote: I am really worried by the 161 positive-reviewed tickets that have been accumulating +1 There have been releases with less tickets than that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-26 Thread fchapoton2
Hello, can we hope to have 8.2 released and move on to 8.3.beta soon ? I am really worried by the 161 positive-reviewed tickets that have been accumulating, and by the potential rebase work that will be triggered. Frederic Le vendredi 20 avril 2018 22:28:15 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-25 Thread nbruin
On Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 2:31:55 PM UTC-7, Steven Trogdon wrote: > Is this a consequence of fixing the banner > > > > LC_ALL=C ./sage > SageMath version 8.2.rc4, Release Date: 2018-04-20 > > and thus no banner, or has it always been this way? I only noticed because I > had changed

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-25 Thread Steven Trogdon
Is this a consequence of fixing the banner LC_ALL=C ./sage SageMath version 8.2.rc4, Release Date: 2018-04-20 and thus no banner, or has it always been this way? I only noticed because I had changed LC_ALL for some other purpose. I usually have LC_ALL unset with the other LC_ variables set

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-24 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
On Ubuntu 16.04 x86_64 Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM, from a fresh git clone + pull develop, parallel (-j16) build OK and make ptestlong passed except for a few transient errors to due to "Jmol failed to create file", as usual on this computer (race error?). All the involved doctests are passed when

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-22 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2018-04-21 10:47 GMT+02:00 Samuel Lelièvre : > > Under macOS 10.10.5 Yosemite, starting from the tarball, > the build fails on cysignals-1.7.0 (this was also the case > for 8.2.rc3, while all previous rc and beta compiled fine). > > Here is the corresponding log file: >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-21 Thread Volker Braun
Its just that: an inconvenience. Its not the only bug, nor the worst bug. We'll be switching to using clang on osx anyways, then you'll need zero gcc builds. Since you'll most likely base your branch off develop, you should be clamoring for faster develop releases... On Saturday, April 21,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-21 Thread John H Palmieri
On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 1:28:18 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > At the end of the day, this just wastes some time on initial build -> not > a blocker. If somebody comes up with a fix in the next 24h I'll merge it. > Has the CEO declared some deadline for the release? I must have

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-21 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Under macOS 10.10.5 Yosemite, starting from the tarball, the build fails on cysignals-1.7.0 (this was also the case for 8.2.rc3, while all previous rc and beta compiled fine). Here is the corresponding log file: http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/cysignals-1.7.0.p0.log I will try

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-21 Thread Volker Braun
At the end of the day, this just wastes some time on initial build -> not a blocker. If somebody comes up with a fix in the next 24h I'll merge it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-20 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 1:28:15 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > As with 8.2.rc3 (and earlier versions,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-20 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 1:28:15 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > As with rc3, it is not self-contained: