[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 10:15:33 AM UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > sage -t --long src/sage/rings/padics/padic_lattice_element.py # Timed out > I'm also seeing this randomly, somebody please investigate! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

On Ubuntu 16.04 x86_64 Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM, from a fresh git clone + pull develop, parallel (-j16) build OK and make ptestlong passed except for 2 transient errors to due to "Jmol failed to create file", as usual on this computer (race error?). Both doctests are passed when run standalone.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

On 2018-05-11 10:41, Dima Pasechnik wrote: I really don't get how #20382 was ever positively reviewed. I guess we were mostly focusing on the technical aspects of the Feature check framework and not so much on the individual checks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 9:22:06 AM UTC+1, François Bissey wrote: > > It is probably an oversight or a corner case in > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20382 > > > Do

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

As already asked to François : Isn't Trac#25323 good enough ? -- Emmanuel Charpentier Vox clamans in deserto... Le jeu. 10 mai 2018 à 19:35, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : > On 2018-05-09 22:21, Volker Braun wrote: > > Open one on

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

On 2018-05-09 22:21, Volker Braun wrote: Open one on trac if there is not one already. +1 A ticket on Trac is much more visible than a mailing list post. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

If it is, it is not the only one, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25332 Vincent On 10/05/2018 10:21, François Bissey wrote: It is probably an oversight or a corner case in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20382 Do open a ticket for that. François On 10/05/2018, at 20:15, Emmanuel

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

I hadn’t looked at it and didn’t really understand the issue. Also I didn’t realise it was a new ticket from the way you said it - I thought you where adding it to a related gap ticket. So it is all fine. > On 10/05/2018, at 21:46, Emmanuel Charpentier > wrote:

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

Isn't Trac#25323 good enough ? -- Emmanuel Charpentier Le jeudi 10 mai 2018 10:22:06 UTC+2, François Bissey a écrit : > > It is probably an oversight or a corner case in > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20382 > Do open a ticket for that. > >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

Upgrades fine with clang-5.0.1 on OpenSuSE Linux, clang-6 would not compile giac I opened #25324. On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:29 AM Henri Girard wrote: > On ubuntu I recently had a problem because curl didn't install properly I > think with bionic I think it's ok > >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

It is probably an oversight or a corner case in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20382 Do open a ticket for that. François > On 10/05/2018, at 20:15, Emmanuel Charpentier > wrote: > > On Debian testing running on cote i7 + 16 GB RAM, make ptestlong gives me >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

On Debian testing running on cote i7 + 16 GB RAM, make ptestlong gives me three errors : sage -t --long src/sage/rings/padics/padic_lattice_element.py # Timed out sage -t --long src/sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py # 1 doctest failed sage -t --long src/sage/features/gap.py # 1 doctest failed

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

On ubuntu I recently had a problem because curl didn't install properly I think with bionic I think it's ok Le 09/05/2018 à 22:11, John H Palmieri a écrit : Volker, it must be a conscious decision on your part to not include curl, git, gcc, and perhaps others in the upstream directory of the

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

there is nothing wrong in having more than one source tarball, one with essential stuff, and one with relatively little-used, such as curl etc. many systems do this, if only to save on storage and bandwidth. bedides, downloading big files might be slow, some IPs might trigger throttling... --

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

I'm just running "sage -sdist", if that is missing something then its a bug. Open one on trac if there is not one already. I'm guessing gcc is special, so its easy to mess that one up. curl and git aren't installed on my system because of a helpful configure check, so apparently they aren't

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

Volker, it must be a conscious decision on your part to not include curl, git, gcc, and perhaps others in the upstream directory of the "self-contained" tarball. Can you explain? Are those the only three affected packages, or are there others? (If we expect people to have internet access while