[sage-support] Interface to 4ti2

I use SageMath 8.6 on Ubuntu 18.04 and want to interface to 4ti2 which is already installed on mt system. Unfortunately I can not run any of the commands of http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/interfaces/sage/interfaces/four_ti_2.html. When I run sage -i 4ti2, it returns that -i is an

Re: [sage-support] Re: A case of immaculate conception...

If the sage preparser did something like, __tmp__ = SR.var("x, y"); __tmp_g__ = lambda x, y: symbolic_expression(x+y**Integer(2)).function(x,y); f = __tmp_g__(*__tmp__) for f(x, y) = x + y ** 2 you wouldn't have this problem and it should be easy enough to change in the preparsesr. Isuru On

Re: [sage-support] Re: A case of immaculate conception...

Hi John, What is the difference between virginal conception and immaculate conception ? I notice that sagemath can even cogitate in philosophy : Really a swiss knife ? I don't believe in spontaneous generation ! lol Henri Le 19/03/2019 à 18:38, john_perry_usm a écrit : Apologies for the

Re: [sage-support] yasm can not be installed/compiled

Hi, just want to confirm that after going to the local disk and having perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker as well as yasm added to the system, sage could be compiled without any further difficulties. Thanks again for your advice ! On Monday, March 18, 2019 at 10:19:15 PM UTC, Florian Hanisch wrote: > >

[sage-support] Re: A case of immaculate conception...

Apologies for the pedantry, but unless the indeterminates so generated are free of all bugs, then strictly speaking this is not immaculate conception; it is spontaneous generation, or perhaps virginal conception. ;-) john perry On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 6:52:19 AM UTC-5, Emmanuel

[sage-support] Re: A case of immaculate conception...

On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 4:52:19 AM UTC-7, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > Defining a symbolic function seems to declare its arguments. Is this > expected ? > It's certainly explicit programmed: sage: preparse("f(x)=1") '__tmp__=var("x"); f = symbolic_expression(Integer(1)).function(x) On

[sage-support] Re: A case of immaculate conception...

Hi Emmanuel, On 2019-03-19, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2019-03-19 12:52, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: >> Defining a symbolic function seems to declare its arguments. > > I tend to think that everything on the left of the '=' sign in an > assignment is stuff that is assigned to. So > >(a, b,

Re: [sage-support] A case of immaculate conception...

On 2019-03-19 12:52, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: Defining a symbolic function seems to declare its arguments. I tend to think that everything on the left of the '=' sign in an assignment is stuff that is assigned to. So (a, b, c) = range(3) assigns to a, b and c. R. = ZZ[] assigns to

[sage-support] A case of immaculate conception...

Defining a symbolic function seems to declare its arguments. Case illustrated in this sagecell example : reset()