On Monday, November 30, 2020 at 7:47:27 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> we should get opensuse tumbleweed properly supported, with CI.
>
> this entails listing the needed packages in build/pkgs/*/distros/
> like we do for Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.
>
>>
>>
Packages for opensuse are already up in
we should get opensuse tumbleweed properly supported, with CI.
this entails listing the needed packages in build/pkgs/*/distros/
like we do for Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.
Fedora would be close match, but not 100% it seems.
(currently trying to build in an lxc container)
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020, 15:36
The whole sage was build with this configuration
Should I retry compilation with systemwide "giac complex" installed and
just don't use system python? Does anyone care?
Kind regards,
Tobias
Tobias Weiss schrieb am Montag, 30. November 2020 um 14:21:55 UTC+1:
> Sagelib compilation worked
Le lun. 30 nov. 2020 à 13:37, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:16 AM Vincent Delecroix
> <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Le 30/11/2020 à 00:48, slelievre a écrit :
> > > 2020-11-29 21:23:36 UTC, Guillermo:
> > >>
> > >> I wonder what would be wrong with replacing
Sagelib compilation worked now, make continued with certifi package. What
did I you? At first I uninstalled the whole "giac complex" which contains
giac, im, arb, flint, ppl, cddlib pari, sympow - devel, binary libraries
and executable packages.
But that was not enough: the problem occures
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:16 AM Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Le 30/11/2020 à 00:48, slelievre a écrit :
> > 2020-11-29 21:23:36 UTC, Guillermo:
> >>
> >> I wonder what would be wrong with replacing '!' → '.factorial()'
> >
> > Interesting idea. Just be careful with `!=`
Le 30/11/2020 à 00:48, slelievre a écrit :
2020-11-29 21:23:36 UTC, Guillermo:
I wonder what would be wrong with replacing '!' → '.factorial()'
Interesting idea. Just be careful with `!=` of course.
Indeed the expression "3!=3" is ambiguous... Of course one can choose
a priority (3!)=(3)
On Sunday, November 29, 2020 at 1:23:36 PM UTC-8 list...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I agree with you, but at the same time I wonder what would be wrong with
> replacing
> '!' → '.factorial()'
>
> Good observation: python already has postfix operators! I still don't like
factorial notation; not even
