gamma(t) = vector([t,t^2,t^3])
is a bit simpler.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this
This is a known issue with the binary distributions for Sage 9.3 and 9.4.
See
https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.4#Availability_as_binaries_and_in_distributions
Install from source instead.
On Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 8:01:00 AM UTC-7 GÖKHAN SOYDAN wrote:
> hello everybody,
>
Instead of:
gamma=vector([t,t^2,t^3])
use:
gamma=vector([t,t^2,t^3]).function(t)
Alternatively, keep gamma as is and use gamma(t=x) instead of gamma(x).
On Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 1:18:52 PM UTC-7 Federico Galetto wrote:
> Hello, I get a warning due to function-call syntax deprecation
Hello, I get a warning due to function-call syntax deprecation and I don't
understand how to fix it despite looking at other similar conversations.
Here is the setup for my code:
t=var('t')
gamma=vector([t,t^2,t^3])
curve=parametric_plot(gamma,(t,-2,2),color='black',radius=0.02)
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 4:00 PM GÖKHAN SOYDAN wrote:
>
> hello everybody,
> I first installed Sage 9.4 on my IMac (Catalina 10.15.7).
> It was running, but some old codes did not run. (I know these codes are
> working on another computer which has Sage 9.3.) After deleting all Sage
>
hello everybody,
I first installed Sage 9.4 on my IMac (Catalina 10.15.7).
It was running, but some old codes did not run. (I know these codes are
working on another computer which has Sage 9.3.) After deleting all Sage
installation documents,
I installed Sage 9.3, but Sage 9.3 did not work. On
That would be nice to fix. Btw, there is also the same issue with formal
integration - like in the example below:
K. = PolynomialRing(QQ)
R. = InfinitePolynomialRing(K)
f = x[0] + x[1]
integrate(f,x[2])
which fails while integrate(f,x[1]) works fine.
Regards,
Max
On Thursday, September 9,
Hi Nils,
can you open a ticket for it?
Best regards,
Simon
On 2021-09-08, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 September 2021 at 09:24:15 UTC-7 max...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> Thank you for your insight, and let me state that I
>> find InfinitePolynomialRing useful in
