[sage-support] Re: The pip ssl mess on Mac OS X: ways forwards

2020-11-23 Thread Nathan Dunfield
For a quick hack fix, you can use: https://github.com/3-manifolds/fix_mac_sage/ On Sunday, November 22, 2020 at 1:24:45 PM UTC-6 watso...@gmail.com wrote: > > Right now pip doesn't work in the binary distributions due to the absence > of the ssl module. This is apparently due to licensing

Re: [sage-support] Re: The pip ssl mess on Mac OS X: ways forwards

2020-11-22 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 9:00 PM John H Palmieri wrote: > > Is it possible to create a binary distribution that relies on a system Python > 3? Those may already be built with ssl support. On macOS? Not really. But one can mimic what cpython is doing in their Python installer - they have a second

[sage-support] Re: The pip ssl mess on Mac OS X: ways forwards

2020-11-22 Thread John H Palmieri
Is it possible to create a binary distribution that relies on a system Python 3? Those may already be built with ssl support. On Sunday, November 22, 2020 at 11:24:45 AM UTC-8 watso...@gmail.com wrote: > > Right now pip doesn't work in the binary distributions due to the absence > of the ssl