[sage-support] Is our toric varieties documentation misleading and/or wrong?

See https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3802874/does-isomorphic-mathbb-q-cohomology-implies-isomorphic-mathbb-z-cohomology/3803623#3803623 Can someone who knows the mathematics decide whether this is an issue that needs to be fixed, or whether the documentation could be clarified? --

Re: [sage-support] fails to get graph_editor() to work

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:45 PM pong wrote: > > Running sagemath 9.1 from a jupyter notebook > > When calling graph_editor() got the following error message. > How can I make the module 'sagenb' works again? > sagenb does not work with Python 3. You'd need Sage 9.1 (or earlier) built with

[sage-support] fails to get graph_editor() to work

Running sagemath 9.1 from a jupyter notebook When calling graph_editor() got the following error message. How can I make the module 'sagenb' works again? [image: ge.png] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-support] Re: Unavailable link in online documentation

2020-08-27 09:03:43 UTC, Daniel Volinski: > > In https://doc.sagemath.org/pdf/en/refer... > > Section "Geometry and Topology', the first link is > * :doc:Euclidean Spaces and Vector Calculus > which does not link to any file. Please fix this. > Now

[sage-support] Unavailable link in online documentation

Hi All, In https://doc.sagemath.org/pdf/en/refer... Section "Geometry and Topology', the first link is * :doc:Euclidean Spaces and Vector Calculus which does not link to any file. Please fix this. Thanks, Daniel -- You received this message