Please add comments to that ticket.
On Tuesday, December 12, 2023 at 6:15:31 PM UTC-8 Andrew wrote:
> Thanks John.
>
> Yes, I think you are right because this PR is about exactly this issue
> and, more importantly, it adds the code that I want to brutalise. I missed
> this when used git blame
Thanks John.
Yes, I think you are right because this PR is about exactly this issue and,
more importantly, it adds the code that I want to brutalise. I missed this
when used git blame to look for recent changes to sage.misc.latex. This
fits as view() was working without issues for me a month
Could this be related to https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36529?
On Tuesday, December 12, 2023 at 3:50:55 PM UTC-8 Andrew wrote:
> Playing around with this a little more, I think that this is a bug/timing
> issue in sage.misc.latex.py (or in subprocess.run, or a mac oddity since
> it
Playing around with this a little more, I think that this is a bug/timing
issue in sage.misc.latex.py (or in subprocess.run, or a mac oddity since it
only started happening recently).
What seems to be happening is that the generated PDF file, output_file, is
being deleted before the viewer is
Playing around with this a little more, I think that this is a bug/timing
issue in sage.misc.latex.py (or in subprocess.run, or a mac oddity since it
only started happening recently).
What seems to be happening is that the generated PDF file, output_file, is
being deleted before the viewer is
