Thierry,
On Tuesday, 2021-08-10 14:28:29 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> I just saw that things have changed.
> The current version of scangearmp2 is 4.20
> So I repackaged it to reflect this, you can use scangearmp2 provided by
> canon:
>
Thierry,
On Monday, 2021-08-02 13:09:34 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> The current version of scangearmp2 is 4.10 (
> https://canoncanadafr.custhelp.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1034243/~/scangear-mp-v.-4.10-for-linux-%28debian-packagearchive%29).
> You can install libmfo2-canon
Ralph and Others,
On Wednesday, 2021-06-30 12:07:49 +0200, I myself wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> On Wednesday, 2021-05-19 18:21:57 -0700, you wrote:
>
> > ...
> > On 2021-05-19 8:46 a.m., Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> > > ...
> > > - The PNG file from the fla
Ralph,
On Wednesday, 2021-05-19 18:21:57 -0700, you wrote:
> ...
> On 2021-05-19 8:46 a.m., Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> > ...
> > - The PNG file from the flatbed clearly showed the original paper hav-
> > ing been rather thin, since some colours from the reverse sid
Ralph,
On Wednesday, 2021-05-19 18:21:57 -0700, you wrote:
> ...
> Some of the pixma devices seems to have a completely different engine
> for generating scans from the ADF compared to the flatbed.
> For ADF, they return JPEG data to SANE instead of the normal raster data
> that we get from
Andrea,
On Wednesday, 2021-05-19 23:16:43 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
>
> I'm not replying as an expert here, only to ask a question: Does you
> Maxify scan both sides in one shot from ADF or does it turn the page to
> scan the other side?
Yes, it does it in one shot, if Duplex is activated.
Greetings,
since our good ol' Canon Pixma MX885 has eventually reached its End Of
Life, we've bought a Canon Maxify MB5150. And because
http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html
listed this scanner as using the same "pixma" backend as the MX885, I
just had to update the IP address in
Olaf,
On Friday, 2020-02-14 17:32:39 +0100, I myself wrote:
> ...
> So I bit the bullet and created just another account in order to submit
> an issue. Again in vain: "File is too big (27.33MiB). Max filesize:
> 10MiB".
Ok. So be it. I meanwhile remembered one of my scripts which
Olaf,
On Saturday, 2020-02-15 11:13:32 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> > What's next? Reduce the value of "SANE_DEBUG_BJNP"? But I can't guar-
> > antee I can reproduce this particular behaviour.
>
> That's probably the best solution even though that would change the
> timing of events leading to
Allan,
On Friday, 2020-02-14 11:36:43 -0500, you wrote:
> Did you compress the file?
Yes, of course. After all the "*.bz2" files were already there :-)
Sincerely,
Rainer
Olaf,
On Friday, 2020-02-14 14:28:16 +0100, I myself wrote:
> ...
> I've compressed the debug output from tests 1 and 3, but the files are
> still huge:
>
>$ ls -l *.bz2
>-rw--- 1 rainer rainer 28659462 2020-02-14 13:35 paperjam.log.bz2
>-rw--- 1 rainer rainer 56919612
Olaf,
I promised to run tests using the current version of "sane-backends" as
well as my Canon Pixma scanner. I used a three sheets, six pages color
original and scanned with "--source 'ADF Duplex'":
Test 1: Run with "export SANE_DEBUG_BJNP=127". After scanning the 4-th
page
Olaf,
On Wednesday, 2020-02-12 20:17:17 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> You could copy your libsane-$BACKEND.* to wherever libsane.* gets
> installed, i.e. $libdir in ./configure terms.
Ok, since I'm currently installing into my home directory, I get
$ ls -lp lib/
total 336
-rwxr-xr-x 1
Olaf,
On Tuesday, 2020-02-11 17:50:54 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> > # Since I'm only specifying a single backend anyway, why not include it
> > # right into the binary rather than load it at start-up?
>
> Why not make that backend your libsane instance?
And how to do that? Or is that what
Olaf,
On Saturday, 2020-02-08 12:52:49 +0900, you wrote:
[ "> >" refers to Bruce Schultz' mail ]
> ...
> > That fails now for me with the same error you error you had.
>
> For me too (on our CI's debian-10-full setup with 336cbdfd as well as
> 1.0.29) but I also get a pile of multiple
Olaf,
On Saturday, 2020-02-08 12:12:00 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> > I've appended file "config.status" below. However, file "config.log" is
> > about 300+ kB in size and thus would be quarantained again. Is it ok to
> > mail it only to you privately?
>
> You already did ;-)
> By sending mail
Olaf,
this is my second try to answer your mail because the first was held due
to being more than 100 kB in size, and I then cancelled it.
On Wednesday, 2020-02-05 18:47:14 +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> ...
> So, if HAVE_LIBJPEG is not defined (check include/sane/config.h), that
> compiled
Bruce,
On Thursday, 2020-02-06 06:47:53 +1000, you wrote:
> ...
> Also, what options are you passing in to ./configure ?
Currently the not $PREFIX related options I'm using are
$ ./configure --disable-avahi --disable-dynamic --disable-nls \
--enable-ipv6
Olaf,
On Friday, 2020-01-31 18:08:28 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> This shouldn't be anything to worry about but I've submitted an issue
> for it. You can find it at:
>
> https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/issues/235
>
> If you could add distribution/version info as well as attach your
>
Olaf,
it's been a while, and I was busy solving more pressing problems. Now
I'm back again to tackle this scanning issue.
On Sunday, 2019-12-15 16:41:01 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> > I know about the existence of environment variable "SANE_DEBUG_BJNP" but
> > have no idea what value to set it
Bruce and All,
On Tuesday, 2019-12-17 07:07:14 +1000, Bruce Schultz wrote:
> ...
> You could try rebuilding the backends with the following command:
>
> EGIT_OVERRIDE_COMMIT_SANE_PROJECT_BACKENDS=6b7052c4 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="**"
> emerge -av1 =media-gfx/sane-backends-
>
> That will install
Bruce and All,
On Thursday, 2019-12-12 23:44:38 +1000, Bruce Schultz wrote:
> ...
> Rainer can you try now with the sane-backends-.ebuild, which will
> install the current git version of the backends. I'm hopeful that having
> something at least as recent as the known working version may
Bruce,
On Thursday, 2019-12-05 06:38:52 +1000, you wrote:
> ...
> I have put together a gentoo overlay for sane-backends with version
> 1.0.28. Can you test this?
>
> https://github.com/brulzki/sane-overlay
I followed the installation instructions in your "README.md" file, first
created file
Olaf,
On Wednesday, 2019-12-04 21:29:05 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> In that case, I suggest you upgrade to at least 1.0.28 and possibly even
> to something later on our master branch.
Gentoo currently does not provide a newer version than 1.0.27-r3. And
if the information I found at
Ralph,
On Tuesday, 2019-12-03 07:39:14 -0800, you wrote:
> ...
> You don't say if you did adf scanning successfully on Ubuntu although I
> assume that is the case.
> Could you confirm that?
Yes, I can :-)
The "scanimage" binary I used under Ubuntu worked with all the options
regarding scan
Greetings,
since quite some time I have been successfully using "scanimage" on my
laptop running Ubuntu 16.04 to scan from a Canon Pixma MX 885 scanner
connected via WiFi.
Under Ubuntu 16.04 the "sane" package itself was version 1.0.14-11, but
packages "libsane", "libsane-common", and
Rolf,
On Saturday, 2019-06-01 18:20:17 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> I just fixed the ppa build dependencies for trusty and xenial. Newer
> Ubuntu versions are not affected. The ppa is building now.
Works like a charm ... :-)
Thank you,
Rainer
--
sane-devel mailing list:
Greetings,
still using Ubuntu 16.04 I've installed "scanimage" from Rolf's PPA:
$ scanimage --version
scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.27git; backend version 1.0.27
$ scanimage -d pixma:MX880_new-host --format png
PNG support not compiled in
$
What's the reason for not supporting PNG? Do I have
Louis,
On Saturday, 2019-04-06 15:14:46 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> I just started wondering if there is a command that is not accepted in
> case of this specific scanner. I have never seen that before, but who
> knows...Will need destailed traces to check that...
>
> @Rainer, to be sure can you
Olaf,
On Saturday, 2019-04-06 21:13:07 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> There is one thing that bothers me a bit though and that's the occurence
> of *six* timeouts, at least in Rainer's case.
This may have to do with my WiFi router: it knows about exactly seven
devices, including the
Louis,
sorry for the delay ... due to other obligations it took me a while to
get back to this problem ...
On Wednesday, 2018-06-06 23:12:24 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> Before we jump into the timeout issue, let's first get the basics
> sorted out:
> - what does a simple "scanimage -L" report?
Greetings,
whenever I'm starting "scanimage" I get a bundle of error messages:
$ SANE_CONFIG_DIR=$HOME/.config/sane scanimage --device
pixma:MX880_192.168.2.199 -T
[bjnp] udp_command: ERROR - no data received (timeout = 1000)
[bjnp] bjnp_init_device_structure: Cannot read mac address, skipping
Wes,
On Monday, 2018-05-14 16:08:24 -0700, you wrote:
> ...
> I am trying to get the system working on a new computer with Ubuntu 16.04.
> We have modified the fujitsu.c file but we are getting an error message. I
> don't have the exact message but it was to the effect that an option was
> not
Greetings,
having spent the better part of last week hunting down a bug in one of
my scripts which utterly failed to OCR the files produced by "scanim-
age", I finally found the cause to be the way "scanimage" interprets its
options:
$ scanimage --device pixma:MX880_192.168.2.199 --format
34 matches
Mail list logo
