Hi again Povilas,
Sorry for the late follow-up.
Povilas Kanapickas writes:
> Hi Olaf, Rene,
>
> Thanks for your replies.
>
> On 26/02/2019 14:48, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>> # Actually, I've been kind of waiting for others to chime in first.
>> # Glad to see that René Rebe, an ex-SANE developer,
Hi Olaf, Rene,
Thanks for your replies.
On 26/02/2019 14:48, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> # Actually, I've been kind of waiting for others to chime in first.
> # Glad to see that René Rebe, an ex-SANE developer, eventually did but
> # would have liked to see some more opinions before my reply :-(.
Hi Povilas,
You asked me off-list to reply, here you go ;-)
# Actually, I've been kind of waiting for others to chime in first.
# Glad to see that René Rebe, an ex-SANE developer, eventually did but
# would have liked to see some more opinions before my reply :-(.
Povilas Kanapickas writes:
>
Hi,
On 14 Feb 2019, at 13:17, Povilas Kanapickas wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I would like to propose adding integration tests to guard against accidental
> regressions especially in rarer scanners that few SANE developers have access
> to. We could run these tests on each pull request on gitlab
Hey,
I would like to propose adding integration tests to guard against
accidental regressions especially in rarer scanners that few SANE
developers have access to. We could run these tests on each pull request
on gitlab without any scanner hardware.
Given limited development resources and
