Hmm, the X offset setting is controlled by the scanner itself. It is
stored somewhere in the scanner firmware, but I'm not sure how we
write to it. I can ask my contacts at Fujitsu for information.
allan
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 2:02 PM Max Voit wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I've been trying to duplex
Dear all,
I've been trying to duplex scan A4 paper with the fi-6130. Setting
"page-size" and "page-width" accordingly was not sufficient. There is
about 2mm empty (grey) space on the right hand side for the front page,
on the left for the back. And the bottom is cut off by about 1cm.
After some
Am 08.03.20 um 17:23 schrieb Ralph Little:
> Hi,
>
> On 2020-03-08 7:23 a.m., Bit Juggler wrote:
>> Dear list readers,
>>
>> i have a Canon LiDE 700F flatbed scanner connected via USB to an
>> USB3.0-port of my machine.
>> My machine runs openSUSE Tumbleweed with
>>
>> Kernel 5.5.7-1-default
>>
Hi,
On 2020-03-07 11:53 p.m., Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
Maybe, maybe not. For the backends/scanners where these are marked as
advanced, is there another less-advanced way to set the scan area?
For example by choosing a paper size like A4 or Letter. If there is, I
think I would classify the
Hi,
On 2020-03-08 7:23 a.m., Bit Juggler wrote:
Dear list readers,
i have a Canon LiDE 700F flatbed scanner connected via USB to an
USB3.0-port of my machine.
My machine runs openSUSE Tumbleweed with
Kernel 5.5.7-1-default
sane-backends 1.0.29-1.1
libsane1 1.0.29-1.1
xsane 0.999-2.10
Using
Dear list readers,
i have a Canon LiDE 700F flatbed scanner connected via USB to an
USB3.0-port of my machine.
> scanimage -L
device `genesys:libusb:001:006' is a Canon LiDE 700F flatbed scanner
>
My machine runs openSUSE Tumbleweed with
Kernel 5.5.7-1-default
sane-backends 1.0.29-1.1
libsane1
Hi,
Way back when some of the SANE developers were working on the draft for
Version 2 of the SANE Standard they realised so much and added a TODO[1]
for a SANE_CAP_AUTO_POLL capability. The draft has been in "coma" since
Autumn 2003 ... and that capability was not added.
The SANE 1.0
Hi,
I would prefer some kind of backend-to-frontend notification mechanism
(pub-sub?) over polling but it should be made part of the SANE Standard
so that all frontends can benefit from it.
My two cents: there is a need for two kinds of asynchronous
notifications, that can come from backend:
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Little writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 2020-03-07 6:06 p.m., Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>>
>> [...], I also think SANE_CAP_SOFT_SELECT is the better choice from
>> the user point of view. However, you might consider adding a check for
>> the current hardware side setting to
Ralph Little writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 2020-03-07 6:06 p.m., Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>> # I considered adding a polling loop but that doesn't make much sense.
>> # You can only signal the frontend via sane_control_option() that it
>> # needs to SANE_INFO_RELOAD_OPTIONS, so checking there is good
Hi Olaf,
Maybe, maybe not. For the backends/scanners where these are marked as
advanced, is there another less-advanced way to set the scan area?
For example by choosing a paper size like A4 or Letter. If there is, I
think I would classify the well-known scan area options as advanced too.
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
