BTW, sometimes it seems to make sense to open the windows driver with a hex
editor, before opening the scanner.
E.g. for the tevion scanner I'm playing with at the moment, there's a file
called Artec48.sys in windows/system32/drivers. The hex editor reveals
something like:
Grand Tech
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:03:57 +0200, stef wrote:
...
[umax_pp_low] SendCommand(0x30) passed ... (umax_pp_low.c:4388)
[umax_pp_low] SendCommand(0x00) passed... (umax_pp_low.c:4395)
[umax_pp_low] status 170 doesn't match! umax_pp_low.c:2806
[umax_pp_low] TestVersion(0) (umax_pp_low.c:4399)
Hi,
scanimage segfaults in the following situation:
- The backend has a boolean option (for example, batch-scan) with
SANE_CAP_AUTOMATIC.
- The user passes the command-line option --batch-scan with no =auto,
=yes, or =no suffix, which as suggested by the brackets in the
--help syntax for
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 02:01:32AM -0700, David Paschal wrote:
scanimage segfaults in the following situation:
- The backend has a boolean option (for example, batch-scan) with
SANE_CAP_AUTOMATIC.
- The user passes the command-line option --batch-scan with no =auto,
=yes, or =no
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 08:38:34PM +0100, Major A wrote:
Anyway, my question is: in scanimage, the options for specifying the
scan area are the left limit and the width, rather than left and right
limits (and similarly for the vertical direction). scanimage will
accept any input that the
Hi Arvind,
you can have a look at http://www.kirchgessner.net/sanehpfaq.html for
some hints.
Sincerely
Peter
mailtoarvind wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to make the sane driver woork for my HP C6270 A Scanner which
is connected to my laptop via a USB Port. When i have installed the sane
Hi,
while trying to check in a modified snapscan.de.po in the sane-backends/po
directory cvs hangs with a repeating waiting for cvs's lock in
/cvsroot/external/sane/sane-backends/po message. Is there any possibility to
remove the lock manually?
Check-in in other directories seems to work.
Henning,
I just tried with a slightly modified test backend with SANE_TYPE_INT
and the range looks ok. Are you sure that this is not related to the
range-max = s-boundaryx - 1; you use when initializing the
ranges? Can you add a DBG in sane_control_option that prints range.max
for the
