Hi,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Philippe Berini wrote:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9, product=0x220d) at /dev/usb/scanner0
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x220d [CanoScan]) at
libusb:001:003
Ok.
If it isn't, the kernel scanner driver probably hasn't
Le Jeudi 14 Novembre 2002 00:12, Henning Meier-Geinitz a écrit :
[.]
Add a device before /dev/usb/scanner0. You won't need the vendor
and prouct ids. Are you sure that you edit the correct plustek.conf
file? That one looks like an older one. If you compiled sane-backends
yourself,
Hi,
Is there a list of all the adf scanner which supported by sane?
Is there somebody how know how can I get a return code from scanimage
in my c program?
Thanks
Raphael
Hi,
On Montag, 11. November 2002 23:38, Cherubini Enrico wrote:
[SNIP]
Ths USB system see my scanner, so in /proc/bus/usb/devices I get:
Great!
If I try sane with export SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK=3D12
The correct way so far!
[plustek] drvopen()
[plustek]
On Mittwoch, 13. November 2002 18:50, John M Flinchbaugh wrote:
[SNIP]
also, at this point, i think you'll find that this scanner does not
produce clean images yet with sane. you get bands of color
distortions. someone is working on it from what i hear around here
though.
Hi,
the picture
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:27:55AM +0100, John Doe wrote:
Is there a list of all the adf scanner which supported by sane?
There was a similar question about this topic some time ago. For a
response see:
http://www.mostang.com/pipermail/sane-devel/2002-November/004983.html
You'll probably
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:27:55AM +0100, John Doe wrote:
Is there a list of all the adf scanner which supported by sane?
There was a similar question about this topic some time ago. For a
response see:
Ciao,
Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:08:42AM +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
and xsane dies
Anyone can help me ? do you need other info ?
Yes, the SANE-version!!!
As Henning already said, 1.0.9 should be used and I suggest
the latest update 0.45-Test2 from www.gjaeger.de/scanner/plustek.html
I
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 05:42:38PM +0300, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
I have noticed that some of the man pages in sane-backends/doc/*.man
have wrong headers:
sane-mustek_usb.man (.TH sane-mustek)
sane-usb.man (.TH sane-scsi)
Thanks, I've fixed these two in CVS.
sane-umax1220u.man (.IX
Hi,
I'm working with a Linotype Saphir2 X-ray Scanner.
I'm trying to obtain 12bit images (--depth 12), but I only obtain 8bit
(multiplied by 16) pixel values.
How can I obtain 'true' 12bit images?
Thanks,
Piernicola
--
\name: Piernicola OLIVA
o/\_ address: Universita'
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:43:49PM +0200, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
Bug: In Save mode, scanning is started before verifying if the file
can be opened. The result is that the scanner stops at middle of scanning
if the file cannot be opened. The file should be verified before also
in the case
Greetings,
I see that there are two SANE programs that do nearly the same thing;
scanimage and adfscan. I understand that adfscan was meant
for use with document feeders, but I've found scanimage to be
better suited because of the versatility it provides with
the --batch* features. As such,
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:18:10PM +0300, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
I have added support for 16bpp mode in xscanimage (in standalone mode,
don't know if the current Gimp version supports more than 8 bits per
channel).
I don't think so.
Only SANE_FRAME_GRAY and SANE_FRAME_RGB are supported
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:27:55AM -0800, Jonathan Stark wrote:
I see that there are two SANE programs that do nearly the same thing;
scanimage and adfscan. I understand that adfscan was meant
for use with document feeders, but I've found scanimage to be
better suited because of the
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:13:11 +0100
Henning Meier-Geinitz henn...@meier-geinitz.de wrote:
sane-umax1220u.man (.IX sane-umax)
Probably also a copy'n'paste mistake. How did you find out about that
one, i.e. where is .IX (index?) used?
Apparently it is not used anywhere (and I'm not sure if it
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:18:35PM +0300, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
Also, there is another problem: according to my man(7) documentation,
the NAME section in all *.man files is wrong. Here is the relevant part
of man(7):
... The only required heading is NAME, which
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:18:10PM +0300, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
I have added support for 16bpp mode in xscanimage (in standalone mode,
don't know if the current Gimp version supports more than 8 bits per
channel).
I don't think so.
Nope.
Hi,
I just compared your second error log with one from Linux. It looks like
the assertion failed in the child process. But the check that failed
there has been done before many times in the parent process. And there
it works. Could it be that for OS/2 the child process does not get a
copy of
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:03:05 +0100, Peter Kirchgessner wrote:
Hi,
I just compared your second error log with one from Linux. It looks like
the assertion failed in the child process. But the check that failed
there has been done before many times in the parent process. And there
it works.
Hello.
--depth 12 is correct, but this normally produces values
with a maximum next to 65535. If you get values small than
4095 then it looks like you use a bad gamma table.
Disable the gamma table as a first test.
Bye
Oliver
Piernicola Oliva schrieb:
Hi,
I'm working with a Linotype Saphir2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Melanie wrote:
I have been given a Mustek ScanExpress A3 EP scanner, which turned out
to be 1505 based (ID 0xA2). I have so far located 3 different Mustek
backends, only one of which offers the beginnings of support for the
1505 chipset.
I'm about ready to give up. I don't know what to try next, any help is=20
appriciated.
I had xsane/sane working. I think the last time I used it was before I=20
updated to RH8 from 7.3.
I still works on my PC, but I can't get it to work on my second one using=
=20
sane's network capability.
22 matches
Mail list logo
