Ira Childress wrote:
I'm probably making this more difficult than it really is, but I just
can't seem to get the scanner working. I just purchased a Scanport 3000
which is suppose to be a Microtek scanner, but usbview shows it as a
Visioneer:
USB Scanner
Manufacturer: Visioneer
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:36:21PM +0100, Franz Bakan wrote:
I now got feedback from a OS/2 user with a microtek2 scanner:
with default etc/sane.d/microtek2.conf containing:
scsi * * Scanner
/dev/scanner
autodetection does not work.
sane-find-scanner
tells:
found SCSI
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:51:29AM -0500, Matto Marjanovic wrote:
The only snag is that for PLANAR formats, the image size needs to be known
ahead of time (because the image data is simply one plane after the other,
with no separators). This means that a PLANAR format is incompatible
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 06:21:30PM -0500, Matto Marjanovic wrote:
this is very similar to the frame type. In fact you do not change a lot with
this. When we want to remove the frames then I suggest to do it right:
only channel-interleaved data, no planes in SANE_(FRAME_)RAW.
Hi,
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:21:56PM -0500, Matto Marjanovic wrote:
There is already a microtek2.conf, because there are microtek and microtek2
backends.
Ok, so /etc/sane2.d/... .
Could there be conflicts between old/new files in .../include/sane, too ?
I don't think so. The only files
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:14:17PM -0500, Matto Marjanovic wrote:
The select mechanism should be removed entirely. I'm not a fan of the
non-blocking I/O either (see below).
Here are some reasons:
a) Currently, every backend which has non-blocking I/O and a selectable
fd
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:36:22PM +0100, Oliver Rauch wrote:
... However, as options are set, other options may become active or
inactive or their constraint may change. Thus, after setting
an option, it may be necessary to re-read the descriptors.
| Image data is collected by
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:39:50PM +0100, Oliver Rauch wrote:
SANE_Status sane_message_callback (SANE_String_Const text);
Only one function. We don't need multiple open messages boxes, do we?
For more than one function, we would need multiple callbacks.
For a graphical interface:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 04:39:54PM -0500, Matto Marjanovic wrote:
(For those who've lost track: this method is to use struct, containing
both the status code and a verbose string pointer, as the return value of
all the sane_() functions.)
Um, except now a string has to be marshalled
I would like to know if it is possible to make
an epson GT-6000 parallel port scanner working
without the parallel port interace that comes
with the scanner.
Thank you very much.
Manuel Arenaz
are...@udc.es said:
I would like to know if it is possible to make an epson GT-6000
parallel port scanner working without the parallel port interace that
comes with the scanner.
I believe you can. It was nothing more than a standard bi-directional
parallel port which where not universal at
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:38, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
are...@udc.es said:
I would like to know if it is possible to make an epson GT-6000
parallel port scanner working without the parallel port interace that
comes with the scanner.
I believe you can. It was nothing more than a standard
Is it necessary to compile the linux kernel with
any special option?
Manuel Arnenaz
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:38, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
are...@udc.es said:
I would like to know if it is possible to make an epson GT-6000
parallel port scanner working without the parallel port interace
Good morning,
If I understand correctly what happens in the case of auth_callback,
the remote sane_func isn't finished yet, the callback is still running.
o Network backend calls the client frontend's callback with string,
then finally returns from sane_func() request.
First
Hello Petter,
I think the SANE CVS server is down - at least I can not contact it.
Oliver
--=20
http://www.xsane.org
http://www.mostang.com/sane
http://www.rauch-domain.de
mailto:oliver.ra...@rauch-domain.de
The difference isn't so much the data format as the code flow: all the
planar data is returned after a single sane_start(), and the multi-fra=
me
flags for determining which 'frame' is currently being scanned can be
removed from the standard.
But you can not expect that the order of the
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 01:21, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
So, why bother? Remove sane_set_io_mode() and eliminate more confusi=
on.
No objection from me.
We should not remove this. It does not cost anything to leave it but it g=
ives=20
the frontend the chance to implement a quick
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 01:35, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
I don't even know how to implement the simple callback over the
network. For a double callback, oh well. I don't want to think about
I do not understand where you see the problem with a callback over the=20
network.
Some details:
| 4.3.8 sane_get_parameters
http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/sane2/0.07/doc012.html#s4.3.8
|typedef struct
| {
[...]
|char reserved[32]; /* 32 bytes for future use */
| }
| SANE_Parameters;
-- SANE_Char, not char
SANE_Byte, not SANE_Char! :)
SANE_Char is
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:53:47PM -0500, Matto Marjanovic wrote:
Some details:
| 4.3.8 sane_get_parameters
http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/sane2/0.07/doc012.html#s4.3.8
|typedef struct
| {
[...]
|char reserved[32]; /* 32 bytes for future use */
| }
|
The difference isn't so much the data format as the code flow: all the
planar data is returned after a single sane_start(), and the multi-frame
flags for determining which 'frame' is currently being scanned can be
removed from the standard.
But you can not expect that the order of
So, why bother? Remove sane_set_io_mode() and eliminate more confusion.
No objection from me.
We should not remove this. It does not cost anything to leave it but
it gives the frontend the chance to implement a quick user
interface.
I don't see any real benefit to leaving it in.
A
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 20:19, Matto Marjanovic wrote:
A frontend which actually wants to guarantee a responsive user interfac=
e
must implement its own mechanism to circumvent blocking backends.
Once the frontend has this code, it no longer cares if there is suppor=
t
for non-blocking
Hello,
I've read all the FAQs, FM's and all that I could find.
Stats:
* aha2940UW with 2 hard disks, cd-rw, zip, tape (see /proc/scsi/scsi
below)
* BusLogic with ScanMaker E6.
* Athalon 1800, 256M ram, gigs of hd space.
* SuSE 8.1 online install, 2.4.19-4G kernel.
xsane and scanimage will
i own an hp-scanner in france
The model is hp scanjet 3570C (the user manual tell me that this is
the 3500 type)
I've installed the new backend's drivers (1.0.9) and
here is the sane-find-scanner result :
# No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make
sure that
#
I have a HP G85 running stabily on spool a small print server, It is setu=
p to=20
scan and does a very good job (ecept sheetfeed dont work automagically us=
ing=20
xsane). I am currently ssh'ing over to spool from any of the terminals on=
my=20
terminal server. I would like to setup the feature
Setting SANE_DEBUG_MICROTEK=128 reveals the following when executing xscanimage
(the last lines of text):
[microtek] .get_scan_status 3...
[microtek] SENSE! fd = 3
[microtek] sense = 00 00 00 00.
[microtek] get_scan_status(6): 0, 5112, 0 - #0
[microtek] 0 f8 13 0 0 0
[microtek]
27 matches
Mail list logo
