Hi,
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 04:40:30AM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
I'm basically a user with respect to sane; the reason I'm here on the
list is that when building it I noticed a passel of warnings. I pinged
off-list about them and the response I got back indicated that patches
to fix them would
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:59:25PM +0200, Eddy De Greef wrote:
I think I've fixed the bug that caused the mustek_pp backend to crash.
Is there a simple way to verify this? (The tstbackend utility did not trigger
a crash; I had to hack the backend to force a crash.)
I created the crash
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 08:21:35AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
From: der Mouse mo...@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
- A lot of unused parameter warnings. I saw some SANE code that does
var=var; to quell such warnings, so presumably at least some people
care.
I've seen such code
-- I hope this is not a duplicated mail for You, my SuSE8.0email is :( --
Hi Oliver,
sorry I maybe said it somewhat unclear. The rgb-pixels align right - no
geometric shift. The difference from preview to final scan is: I see an
yellowish preview an get an bluish scan. It locks like xsane uses an
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:04:24PM +0200, Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
sorry I maybe said it somewhat unclear. The rgb-pixels align right - no
geometric shift. The difference from preview to final scan is: I see an
yellowish preview an get an bluish scan. It locks like xsane uses an
other
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:22:13AM +0200, Franz Bakan wrote:
In the meantime I got a second computer and found
time to test saned. I can report that this feature also works
with 2 OS/2 Computers over the network. Tested with
1.0.11 and current CVS-code.
Good. I feared that the OS/2
There is an option use custom gamma table. When you enable this
option then the gamma correction of a scan (not preview) is done in
the scanner. When you disable it the gamma correction is done
in xsane. The gamma correction of the preview always is done in
xsane.
But I do not think that this is
On 2003.04.03 00:36, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:59:25PM +0200, Eddy De Greef wrote:
I think I've fixed the bug that caused the mustek_pp backend to crash.
Is there a simple way to verify this? (The tstbackend utility did not
trigger
a crash; I had to
