Hi all!
I still apply on working on the french translations. That's the only thing
I've got time for, working on dev is too much involvement for now.
Please tell me when the next update for SANE is due, so I can work on the
translations before they need to be released! ;-)
By the way, the site
Hai henning:
I will develop Linux driver for Mustek A3Pro scanner. But I have some
problem in Usb modules and scanner modules of kernel.
Here is scanner info and debug info when i attach scanner to PC
hub.c: new USB device 00:07.2-2, assigned address 2
usb.c: kmalloc IF c9a31860,
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 04:41:57PM -0500, Peter Chen wrote:
Is it ok to remove libusb?
See my answers to your previous articles. Did you read them?
It would be much easier if you would just respond to the already
existing articles instead of constantly creating new subjects.
And I checked
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 12:33:04AM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
Please tell me when the next update for SANE is due, so I can work on the
translations before they need to be released! ;-)
There is no time table yet. But I guess in May or June.
By the way, the site says anon cvs is still
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 06:40:46AM -0500, Peter Chen wrote:
I read your previous emails. Please see my replies below.
Ok. But I'll CC the mailing list again because I'm have not much clue
baout the specifics of the fujitsu backend itsself.
In your previous email, you said you would be
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:04:13 +0100
Major A and...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
At least with Mustek BearPaw 2400TA, there is a difference between using
scanner.c or libusb: libusb is slower. Usually this does not matter -
but at some resolutions scanning becomes unusably slow with libusb
On Mon, 07 Apr 2003 18:50:36 +
José López Ruiz anasta...@m.adade.es wrote:
System:
Debian Woody 3.0
Kernel compiled: 2.4.14
Module: g_NCR5380
Scanner: Mustek Scanmagic 9636S
Chip: DTC3181LE(DOMEX 436P)
Command modprobe g_NCR5380 ncr_addr=0x280 dtc_3181e=1
Messages in boot time:
the various X sane frontends dont seem to support duplex scanning. they do
make the 'duplex' option available for you to select, but that is just a
pass-thru from the backend.
i would recommend that you try the command line prog 'scanadf' it does
duplex and uses the adf. i just used it (in
Till friday I had much to do. So my answere comes today as I continued to
test.
Am 03.04.03, 18:27 +0200 schrieb Oliver Rauch:
May be you have a problem with the lamp or the calibration.
What results when you do:
- preview #1
- scan #1
- preview #2
- scan #2
(always the same areas and
Hai, Henning
Today, I modified scanner.c for Mustek A3Pro usb scanner (0x055f
0x0401)
In probe_scanner.
modified
have_bulk_in = 1
have_bulk_out =2
have_intr = 3
to
have_bulk_in = 0
have_bulk_out = 1
have_bulk_intr = 2
/
+ have_bulk_in--
+
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Problems after upgrading to Redhat 8.0
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:01:56 +0100
From: Nicholas Robinson n...@bottlehall.freeserve.co.uk
To: sane-devel-ad...@www.mostang.com
Hi
I've been using sane and xsane with a snapscan 1236 for over a year and
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 04:46:09PM +0100, Nicholas Robinson wrote:
I've been using sane and xsane with a snapscan 1236 for over a year and
upgraded a number of times. I usually use xsane across the network and have
no trouble.
I've just upgraded to RH8.0 and my sane-backends and xsane
Hi,
I do have scanner HP ScanJet 7450 (it is 7400 with ADF),
Linux Redhat 7.2, kernel 2.4.20 with modules usbcore, uhci
compiled myself.
I have downloaded sane version
sane-avision-2003-03-27-0055-build70.tar.bz2
and compiled with no warnings.
usb modules:
usbcore
uhci
and mounted
none
13 matches
Mail list logo
