I had a look at a transaction log of a Canon FS4000 connected
via SCSI: The SCSI commands are not the same as for the other
Canon scanners. A number of them is vendor-specific and - since
Canon does not make programming details available - undocumented.
Hence the Canon-SCSI backend cannot be used
Hi,
www.mostang.com was temporaryly down. But when you now have a look at
http://panda.mostang.com/sane/sane-mfgs.html
you can see that it is not supported.
You can also now search the mailing list again and you will see that
there seems to be some effort to analyze that scanner. So just wait
Le Samedi 9 Ao=FBt 2003 12:34, Major A a =E9crit :
Hi,
I think that we should get the SANE2 implementation rolling, even if
the standard isn't completely finalized. A standard is never final
without even a single frontend and backend to use it.
As Henning has said, adapting the test backend
Hi,
I could not find a backend for my PrimeFilm 1800i, so I decided to write
one. It seems that I can't get anything about the protocol so I used
usbsnoop on a windows box to log the protocol. It produced a nice 8 Mb log
file. Next, lacking any experience with USB I started reading the specs, the
Just a thought. Could SANE2 introduce a handcheck protocol to determine which
API is used :
frontend_knows_versions( list_of_versions )
backend_agrees_to_use( version )
frontend_confirms_use_version( version )
If those functions are not found in backend - SANE1
How do you expect that to
--UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As the other person said, post a link somewhere. Basically you need to
determine the structure of the protocol. Is it writing and writing the same
places again and
Please don`t mix versions in the backend.
There is no reel advantage to create a backend that supports version1 and=
=20
version2.
But it makes the backends very complex, large and has a high risk for bug=
s.
Oliver
On Sunday 10 August 2003 10:06, Thomas Soumarmon wrote:
Le Samedi 9 Ao=FBt 2003
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Karsten Festag wrote:
The 3830 type is not yet supported as far as I know. The newer microtek
scanners are mostly very different from the ones supported by the
microtek2 backend. Hopefully some owner of such a scanner will try to
write a
Please don`t mix versions in the backend.
There is no reel advantage to create a backend that supports version1 and
version2.
But it makes the backends very complex, large and has a high risk for bugs.
I totally agree. Universal frontends are a must (or at least a dll1
meta-backend for
