St?phane,
I tested it on my Lexmark X1185.
It is broken really badly. It hangs in the function
sanei_lexmark_x1100_search_home_fwd - infinite read loop in a poll after
trying to move the scan head. I did a register compare from usb dumps of
a good scan (sane-backends-1.0.17) and a bad scan
the
scripts to take care of that.
Regards,
Stef
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dist.tar.bz2
Type: application/x-tbz
Size: 10846 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060520/fddc36cb
Well, I have two problems in reverting the changes:
- there are with one small exception no diffs in the LiDE20
parametersets between 1.0.17 and 1.0.16
- I only have a N670U for testing, which should be the same device
as the LiDE20, but I could not detect any problems :(
Well I also got one
Hi,
I try to run the fi-4120C2 a Mac OSX 10.4.5 but I have the same
problems like Darrell Styner reported in November 2005 in his post
titled: 'Install problem with fi-4120C2 under FreeBSD and OS X 10.4.2'
Would the updated backend you mentioned works for it?
beda
Please forgive the very long post, but I wanted to get some specifics
recommended actions to restore access to my Canon LIDE20 scanner, which
has been inaccessible roughly since the upgrade to sane-backends-1.0.17.
My scanner problems seemed to closely match reports those of users with
St?phane
Much better. I was able to do a scan. However, the scan had blue streaks
down the middle. It also started the scan too early (you can see the
area off the glass) and the rewind went too far (you could hear the scan
head hitting the end). I can create logfiles if you want. Just let me
On Thursday 18 May 2006 19:04, m. allan noah wrote:
rene/sane-devel: Giuseppe has been kind enough to open his fujitsu
fi-4010CU, and get the chip numbers: i think we can conclude this is
avision, see below...
Yep that should be avision based. I'm a bit out of sync right now,
are the usb
Hi,
yes, the avision backend is the one to use. Hower I do not get
feedback about the state of the models that often and thus I do not know
what revision is the last good or best one. the dual II once worked with
the avision backend - maybe try the latest or search the list for the
last known
Il giorno sab, 20/05/2006 alle 22.15 +0200, Ren? Rebe ha scritto:
[...]
Yep that should be avision based. I'm a bit out of sync right now,
are the usb snoops available?
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2006-May/016844.html
If you need anything more just ask. But I have the
