Dear All:
I have downloadn the source package(sane-backends-1.0.17) for compiling.I
use command ./configure CC=gcc 3.3 --host=i386, My gcc version is 3.3.The
configure have passed.But when making,It fail.It show that Entering
directory `/home/SANE/new/sane-backends-1.0.17/doc',/bin/sh:
wulywuly wuly12...@hotmail.com writes:
Dear All:
I have downloadn the source package(sane-backends-1.0.17) for
compiling.I use command ./configure CC=gcc 3.3 --host=i386, My
Are you sure you didn't forget a dash? Using CC=gcc-3.3 might help
but if that is your default compiler, then
Bertrik Sikken wrote:
By the way, it's indeed a bit unusual to see interface-class requests
at the start of the log. It looks like those transfers are used to
upload firmware or something. Can you find out what the USB id of
your device is, after it has been plugged into windows?
Can you also
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, m. allan noah wrote:
i need suggestions or pointers to code that i could use. what things i can
find are far over my head, but i have a simple brightness adjustment that
shifts the linear slope of the in-out function up or down, and a crude
contrast setting that changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
m. allan noah wrote:
recent model fujitsu scanners dont have native brightness/contrast/gamma
support, instead they use an 256x256 or 1024x256 bit look up table to
convert the raw scan data before 8 bit output.
while it is true that the 8bit
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Bertrik Sikken wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
m. allan noah wrote:
recent model fujitsu scanners dont have native brightness/contrast/gamma
support, instead they use an 256x256 or 1024x256 bit look up table to
convert the raw scan data before 8
Hello,
I took the cover off of my Canon FS2720U to try to confirm some
suspicions I have about the unit. The main board has what looks like a
CPU and it is marked Canon KINUGAWA YH4-0153. The main board is
marked YG7-0172-01 in one spot and Z923A in another. There is a
daughter card marked
many brands of scanner use some form of scsi over usb protocol, so this
sort of weirdness is not unusual. fortunately, this means that
understanding the scanner's protocol should be made easier, because of how
well documented SCSI is.
allan
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Tabor Kelly wrote:
Hello,
