[sane-devel] Avision scanner

2007-05-07 Thread Robin Stewart
This is the avision.conf file as just adjusted by me. After the adjustment the scanner is still not being found by sane: #option disable-gamma-table #option disable-calibration #option force-a4 #scsi AVISION #scsi FCPA #scsi MINOLTA #scsi MITSBISH MCA-S600C #scsi MITSBISH MCA-SS600

[sane-devel] wrong colors for a HP ScanJet 2200C using a GUI

2007-05-07 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
On Freitag, 4. Mai 2007, Gerhard Jaeger wrote: On Freitag, 4. Mai 2007, Johannes Meixner wrote: Hello, I got a strange bug report from a user: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269921 Short summary: He uses a HP ScanJet 2200C USB scanner with the plustek backend.

[sane-devel] Avision scanner

2007-05-07 Thread m. allan noah
drop the libusb line from the file, you likely only need the vid/pid line. then run the same debug test as before. lets make sure the backend reads the file properly and looks for the scanner. allan On 5/7/07, Robin Stewart s48...@bluebottle.com wrote: This is the avision.conf file as just

[sane-devel] Avision scanner

2007-05-07 Thread Robin Stewart
Using sudo gedit /etc/sane.d/avision.conf I have just removed the line. I then run scanimage -L and unfortunately no scanners were identified. Robin The above comments are in response to m. allan noah's email of 07/05/07 12:17 as quoted below: drop the libusb line from the file, you likely

[sane-devel] Avision AV8300 Support for 11x17in Document Size

2007-05-07 Thread Tom Garvin
Thanks Allan, that works for me. -Original Message- From: sane-devel-bounces+tomgarvin=amyskitchen@lists.alioth.debian.org [mailto:sane-devel-bounces+tomgarvin=amyskitchen.net@lists.alioth.debian .org] On Behalf Of m. allan noah Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 7:33 AM To:

[sane-devel] Fujitsu fi-60F small document scanner

2007-05-07 Thread Rob Shortt
Hello, We have a Fujitsu fi-60F scanner that we would very much like to have working in linux. This is a small document (A6) flatbed scanner and I believe is the only one of its kind. The system I'm testing on is FC5 with kernel 2.6.20 with SANE 1.0.18. The product ID for this device is

[sane-devel] Avision Backend

2007-05-07 Thread Robin Stewart
Thank you very much for your help. I assume that running it as root means putting sudo in front. I can not run the command: sudo SANE_DEBUG_AVISION=7 scanimage -L it gives a command not found error. Robin The above comments are in response to m. allan noah's email of 07/05/07 17:36 as

[sane-devel] Fujitsu fi-60F small document scanner

2007-05-07 Thread m. allan noah
well, you are the first person to report having one, so you are going to have to provide whatever extra info there is :) as root: SANE_DEBUG_FUJITSU=30 scanimage --help 2fi60.log and send me fi60.log directly. btw- you have doppler misspelled several times on your website... allan On 5/7/07,

[sane-devel] Avision Backend

2007-05-07 Thread m. allan noah
try this: su - (give root password) you now have a root shell. then run the command i gave. logout of root shell when done. allan On 5/7/07, Robin Stewart s48...@bluebottle.com wrote: Thank you very much for your help. I assume that running it as root means putting sudo in front. I can

[sane-devel] Avision Backend

2007-05-07 Thread Robin Stewart
Allan When I run su and put in my login password it is rejected as an authentication failure. When I use the same password in sudo, it works! Do you have a work around? Robin The above comments are in response to m. allan noah's email of 07/05/07 18:18 as quoted below: try this: su -

[sane-devel] minor problem with current (20070507) CVS code on OS/2

2007-05-07 Thread Franz Bakan
Hi, configure (generated by Autoconf 2.61) fails and claims not to find grep (which is bogus) Running autoconf (2.59) locally solves the problem. can someone please regenerate configure in cvs with autoconf 2.59 Bye, Franz

[sane-devel] Avision Backend

2007-05-07 Thread Julian Stacey
Robin Stewart wrote: Allan When I run su and put in my login password it is rejected as an authentication failure. When I use the same password in sudo, it works! Do you have a work around? Maybe sudo doesnt check if your UID is in group 0 in /etc/group. whereas su does check bounce you.