Would like to define my printer for the xsane copy mode, for being able
to make a fotocopy with my scanner. But I don't know how to define my
printer.
This is what I did.
First sone definitions:
Architecture of my machine: Asus A8NE Mobo with Athlon 64 processor.
Distro SuSE 10.3 for i32
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:58:47 +0100
Julien BLACHE jb at jblache.org wrote:
Speaking of branching and stuff, would anyone oppose a move to
subversion ? The association of branching and CVS makes me a bit
nervous and brings back bad memories :) I'm probably not the only one
;)
agreed :)
--
Oliver Rauch Oliver.Rauch at rauch-domain.de wrote:
Hi,
Speaking of branching and stuff, would anyone oppose a move to
subversion ? The association of branching and CVS makes me a bit
nervous and brings back bad memories :) I'm probably not the only one
;)
I have no problems with
can we have both svn and cvs enabled at the same time? if not, we
would have to migrate...
allan
On 12/24/07, Julien BLACHE jb at jblache.org wrote:
Oliver Rauch Oliver.Rauch at rauch-domain.de wrote:
Hi,
Speaking of branching and stuff, would anyone oppose a move to
subversion ? The
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
can we have both svn and cvs enabled at the same time? if not, we
would have to migrate...
I think we can, but migrating is the best solution as it'll avoid
confusion :)
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE http://www.jblache.org
cwlitt wrote:
Can anyone shed some light on SANE support for the Canon PIXMA MP140
scanner/printer. I see the MP130 and MP150 are documented in the
supported devices list but not the MP140.
MP140 is a new model, while MP130 and 150 older.
Maybe the protocol changed significantly between
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:36:09 +0100
Julien BLACHE jb at jblache.org wrote:
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
can we have both svn and cvs enabled at the same time? if not, we
would have to migrate...
I think we can, but migrating is
Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
btw... I made an extensive search on the net and on the archives
about -lsane-backend vs -lsane and found none... so, in case,
we are not going to break anything :)
All the backends have a soname of libsane.so.1.
And you're unlikely to
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 19:32:09 +0100
Julien BLACHE jb at jblache.org wrote:
All the backends have a soname of libsane.so.1.
And you're unlikely to see that in a public project. Most of the time
the faculty is used by custom frontends to link statically with one
backend, it's little used at
