Sorry, should have gone to the list:
On Feb 18, 2008 4:05 AM, m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
nicolas- please dont remove the lines from canon-mfp.desc, if that
external backend still supports those machines. it is ok to have the
same machines listed in two different desc files.
Guillaume Gastebois schrieb:
Hello,
I try both {0x00, 0x3f, 0x03, 0x26}, and {0x00, 0x3f, 0x00, 0x26},
you can find result under :
http://ggastebois.free.fr/lide90_snoop/17_test1.tar
and http://ggastebois.free.fr/lide90_snoop/17_test2.tar
Looks a lot better. The offset*.pnm actually show a
I am looking for a documentscanner. I saw the HP scanjet 7800. Some
internetsites gives the information LINUX driver on request. HP does not
have a driver. Is there a 7800 driver in SANE?
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:18:56 +0100
Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
shall we find a way to tell the driver to enable those new options?
maybe a well known sane option ?
I'd feel much safer if a frontend can enable it in some explicit way.
or with
yes- we should make a little effort to keep the external backends files updated.
allan
On 2/18/08, nicols nicolas.martin at freesurf.fr wrote:
Ok, will fix and update the desc and man files today.
Can we add then to Canon_mfp .desc file, the latest Canon Pixma models for
which Canon has
Hi, i have a problem running as normal user. When i call sane_open it
return a null SANE_Handler. this doesn't happen as root (it work fine)
Also i can detect the scanner as normal user and scan with scanimage.
So i thing it not problem with permissions
Any help will be apreciated.
Tobias
===
== Neuer Eintrag
===
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---
1. Your email address:
'matvancormick at yahoo.com'
2. Manufacturer
SANE_Handle is opaque, you should not try to interpret its value as a
pointer. what status code do you get?
allan
On Feb 18, 2008 8:45 AM, tobias alarcon extobias at gmail.com wrote:
Hi, i have a problem running as normal user. When i call sane_open it
return a null SANE_Handler. this doesn't
On Feb 14, 2008 11:26 PM, Paul C. Bryan email at pbryan.net wrote:
...
1. Overscanning pages (simplex/duplex ADF)
If the ADF-scanned page is smaller than the geometry set in the -y
parameter value, content from the following page is included on the
previous page. It would seem that the
On Feb 18, 2008 11:00 AM, m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
SANE_Handle is opaque, you should not try to interpret its value as a
pointer. what status code do you get?
i get a SANE_STATUS_IO_ERROR.
allan
On Feb 18, 2008 8:45 AM, tobias alarcon extobias at gmail.com wrote:
Hi, i
On Feb 18, 2008 9:37 AM, tobias alarcon extobias at gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 11:00 AM, m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
SANE_Handle is opaque, you should not try to interpret its value as a
pointer. what status code do you get?
i get a SANE_STATUS_IO_ERROR.
yet if you
Hello,
I made two tests today :
test 1 : too bright/too dard = 10/65525 WITH flag :
SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP. Result can bee found on :
http://ggastebois.free.fr/lide90_snoop/18_test1.tar
test 2 : too bright/too dard = 10/65525 WITHOUT flag :
SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP. Result can bee found on :
feel free to update the comment in canon_mfp.desc. you can even put in
a plug for your free pixma backend.
allan
On Feb 18, 2008 12:57 PM, nicols nicolas.martin at freesurf.fr wrote:
Ok, sounds good to have also an up to date repository of Canon's proprietary
scanner backends
However, one
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Oliver Rauch
oliver.rauch at rauch-domain.de wrote:
Am Freitag, den 15.02.2008, 15:08 +0100 schrieb Alessandro Zummo:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:37:08 -0500
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
unfortunately, the DPI is not one of the parameters
===
== Neuer Eintrag
===
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---
1. Your email address:
'sergey at avramov.pp.ru'
2. Manufacturer
An 1.1 compliant frontend should:
1) check for sane version = 1.1 (a macro will be provided)
2) call sane_control_option
int supported_version = SOMEMACRO(1,1);
sane_control_option(handle, 0, SANE_ACTION_, supported_version,
NULL);
3) the backend can then expose
but now a front-end that wants to build against sane1.0 has to define
these new macros itself, making portable front-end becomes harder?
allan
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Alessandro Zummo
alessandro.zummo at towertech.it wrote:
An 1.1 compliant frontend should:
1) check for sane
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:00:27 -0500
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
but now a front-end that wants to build against sane1.0 has to define
these new macros itself, making portable front-end becomes harder?
why an 1.1 capable frontend should compile against sane 1.0?
--
Best
Am Montag, den 18.02.2008, 13:48 -0500 schrieb m. allan noah:
two places where this does not work:
1. the backend does not expose resolution options because it only has one
choice
2. the backend does not know the resolution the scanner will actually
use until after the call to start
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Oliver Rauch
oliver.rauch at rauch-domain.de wrote:
Am Montag, den 18.02.2008, 13:48 -0500 schrieb m. allan noah:
two places where this does not work:
1. the backend does not expose resolution options because it only has one
choice
2. the backend
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:32:42 -0500
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
cause it is what is on the user's box.
well, it is not absurd for an user to install
a recent -dev package if he wants to compile a recent
frontend.
if a frontend author wants ease the burden of its users, we
Updated the pixma external desc file, and renamed MultiPass MP710/MP740 to
Pixma MP710/MP740 as suggested in desc and man files.
Nicolas
Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
Just to chime in here: Nicolas, the MP710 is a PIXMA device, and the
type with extra fax support is the MP740. I am not sure
===
== Neuer Eintrag
===
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---
1. Your email address:
'r.snajdr at coramexport.cz'
2. Manufacturer
Currently using backend for Canon MP450 - thanks.
Need backend for HP 4370 to process 35mm slides.
OS is updated Fedora 7.
Harv
24 matches
Mail list logo
