Hi,
i think the best you can do is to require that the backend accept
alternate names for the scanner if it is going to use something other
than the list you gave above.
Sorry, i didn't mean to impose one unique device name, but as you said,
simply require one common naming for supporting HAL
===
== Neuer Eintrag
===
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---
1. Your email address:
'phillp66 at q.com'
2. Manufacturer (e.g.
===
== Neuer Eintrag
===
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---
1. Your email address:
'phillp66 at q.com'
2. Manufacturer (e.g.
Hello,
a bit off-topic but related: Automated backend activation
On Mar 18 17:48 abel deuring wrote (shortened):
... But the HAL callout could also mess with dll.conf and
enable those backends that fit to a newly detected scanner.
No HAL is needed for automated backend activation.
Only udev
Hi,
Very interesting, thanks goes to SUSE for working for long time on
scanner integration with udev and HAL.
The HAL callout goal would be simply to compute the SANE device name put
it to HAL device property scanner.sane.device_name . This does not need
any SANE call as long as all backends
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:38 AM, ?tienne Bersac bersace03 at gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Very interesting, thanks goes to SUSE for working for long time on
scanner integration with udev and HAL.
The HAL callout goal would be simply to compute the SANE device name put
it to HAL device property
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: canon-lide-90.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 7930 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080319/9f3fa7bd/attachment.bin
Hello,
On Mar 19 10:18 m. allan noah wrote (shortened):
... small concerns about this plan: replication of naming code
makes that convention a de facto API, and what about external
backends?
Isn't the worst case when the udev/HAL/whatever magic fails
that there is no nice just works
Hi,
1. a small callout, distributed with hal, which replicates the
sanei_{usb,scsi} device naming logic, and saves this device_name
string back into the hal data structure
2. a bigger callout, distributed with ??, which links to the dll
backend, and takes that device_name string, and does
On 18 Mar 2008 at 10:27, m. allan noah wrote:
I have checked everything listed below and all looks fine.
Inetutils-inetd is shown (Via ps -Af) running as ROOT
What is puzzling me is the output of manually running saned with different
values after
the d flag, d5 and above and it works, less
see all those 'Address already in use' statements? something is
already listening on the port, perhaps inetd?
allan
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Geoff Lane bunsen at tesco.net wrote:
On 18 Mar 2008 at 10:27, m. allan noah wrote:
I have checked everything listed below and all looks fine.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:24:45PM +0100, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
+ ,
+ /* CANONLIDE90 */
+ {
+/*
+00 :
+02 : image ?? la con et inverse video
+0a : image ?? la con et inverse video et moteur ne stoppe pas ?? la fin du
scan
+0e : ne reconnait plus la position home
+10 : mieux
Volker Grabsch schrieb:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:24:45PM +0100, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
+ ,
+ /* CANONLIDE90 */
+ {
+/*
+00 :
+02 : image ?? la con et inverse video
+0a : image ?? la con et inverse video et moteur ne stoppe pas ?? la fin du
scan
+0e : ne reconnait plus la
Hi,
It's just because they come from temporary code from a French person. As
I'm french to, I'll translate for you ;)
(I'll not translate word by word, cause image ? la con means something
like fucking picture)
+02 : image ?? la con et inverse video
dirty inverted picture
+0a : image ?? la
Hi.
I just downloaded the current version from the CVS, an applied the patches. But
sane does not find the scanner.
sane-find-scanner is ok, but scanimage not. in /etc/sane.d/genesys.conf I have
added the ID of the scanner.
I tried everything as root, so acces-rights should not be the reason.
Pressing any button on the scanner helped
this is the output of scanimage:
[genesys_gl841] **
[genesys_gl841] **
[genesys_gl841]
[genesys_gl841]
Ralf Haueisen schrieb:
Hi.
I just downloaded the current version from the CVS, an applied the patches.
But sane does not find the scanner.
sane-find-scanner is ok, but scanimage not. in /etc/sane.d/genesys.conf I
have added the ID of the scanner.
I tried everything as root, so
I tried again, an now not even pressing a button help.
What code do you need, and how can i get it?
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Pierre Willenbrock pierre at pirsoft.dnsalias.org
Gesendet: 19.03.08 17:53:48
An: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Betreff: Re: [sane-devel] Canon
===
== Neuer Eintrag
===
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---
1. Your email address:
'osgxrged at yahoo.com'
2. Manufacturer (e.g.
On 19.03.2008 14:24, Johannes Meixner wrote:
Though this might also be a bit dangerous: The callout should
not touch any backends for devices that are for example
accessible via ethernet.
Could you explain what you mean?
What I mean is that dll.conf entires for backends for network
you could get a debug log of the backend in action, and post it here
for inspection, but redhat 9 is so ancient, that there is a good
chance the issue is already fixed in sane 1.0.19. try upgrading first.
allan
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Martin martinh at ix.netcom.com wrote:
Hello,
I
Hi all,
iam having a problem with this scanner.
Everthing goes fine on scanning, but when a try to scan
after calling sane_cancel() can't open the scanner
this is what debur say
[fujitsu] sane_start: start
[fujitsu] scanner_control: start
[fujitsu] do_usb_cmd: start
[fujitsu] do_usb_cmd: finish
Hello,
Volker Grabsch schrieb:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:24:45PM +0100, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
+ ,
+ /* CANONLIDE90 */
+ {
+/*
+00 :
+02 : image ?? la con et inverse video
+0a : image ?? la con et inverse video et moteur ne stoppe
pas ?? la fin
Hi,
I converted my canon lide30 to a digital back for my cambo wideframe
camera, as in this project.
You can find some pictures I took here.
I've used this scanner setup with vuescan on vista and xsane on
ubuntu. As you can see on the examples it has the capability to
reproduce grate gray scales.
i am not surprised. i dont think i ever got canceling to work right.
i'll take a look at it. BTW- how many scanners do you own :)
allan
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 3:07 PM, tobias alarcon extobias at gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
iam having a problem with this scanner.
Everthing goes fine on
you forgot the url for your samples. also, please join the list before
starting this discussion, so the moderators wont have to approve all
your posts.
allan
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Jo Dierickx dierickxjo at gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I converted my canon lide30 to a digital back for my
with subject unsubscribe your_password
to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080319/3d9de264/attachment.htm
SANE_DEBUG_GT68XX=4 xsane 2 mt1200.log
then send mt1200.log to the list. you might also want to try removing
the .sane directory from your homedir.
allan
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Martin martinh at ix.netcom.com wrote:
Versions used:
/usr/local/bin/scanimage --version
scanimage
Hello everybody,
I'm running a Scanjet 3690 based on a GL646_HP.
I see that Sane doesn't support this scanner but do have a GL646 support.
So my question is : what's the difference bethween both chipset ?
Where can I find doc about GL646_HP ? (I found some pretty good one for GL646
but not the
at lists.alioth.debian.org
--
The truth is an offense, but not a sin
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080319/7b8a5062/attachment.htm
Guillaume Gastebois schrieb:
Hello,
Volker Grabsch schrieb:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:24:45PM +0100, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
+ ,
+ /* CANONLIDE90 */
+ {
+/*
+00 :
+02 : image ?? la con et inverse video
+0a : image ?? la con et inverse
--
The truth is an offense, but not a sin
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080319/b3fdd8d6/attachment-0001.htm
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Jo Dierickx dierickxjo at gmail.com wrote:
I converted my canon lide30 to a digital back for my cambo wideframe camera,
as in this project.
You can find some pictures I took here. etc etc
this looks like you are saturating the CIS. normally, the LEDs are
at lists.alioth.debian.org
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080319/2d083820/attachment.htm
Le Friday 14 March 2008 15:01:06 stef, vous avez ?crit?:
Hello,
I have finished a new backend for rts8891 based scanner such as HP 4470c
and Umax Astra 4400.
It features:
- 75, 150, 300, 600 and 1200 dpi color/gray/lineart scans
- custom gamma
Le Wednesday 19 March 2008 21:42:46 Tourneur Henry-Nicolas, vous avez ?crit?:
Hello everybody,
I'm running a Scanjet 3690 based on a GL646_HP.
I see that Sane doesn't support this scanner but do have a GL646 support.
So my question is : what's the difference bethween both chipset ?
Where
I tried , SANE_DEBUG_GT68XX=4 xsane 2 mt1200.log
But it does not produce any output.
Do I need to ./configure something with the debug switch enabled?
The version of xsane I have is - could this be a problem?
--
$ xsane --version
xsane-0.89 (c) 1998-2002 Oliver
no, that looks like the right command. is there any chance you have
two copies of sane installed? one in /usr/lib, and the other in
/usr/local/lib?
allan
On 3/19/08, Martin martinh at ix.netcom.com wrote:
I tried , SANE_DEBUG_GT68XX=4 xsane 2 mt1200.log
But it does not produce any output.
...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080319/ed64f4d8/attachment.htm
i bet xsane is using the system copy, and scanimage is using the
replacement. redhat does not put /usr/local/lib in /etc/ld.so.conf. so
either do that, or even better, reconfigure to overwrite the old copy,
and reinstall.
allan
On 3/19/08, Martin martinh at ix.netcom.com wrote:
Yes, I have,
40 matches
Mail list logo
