Hello,
the only difference I could spot is slightly different motor
acceleration
tables. The ones generated by the backend are very close to the ones in
windows logs, but in case your scanner's motor is less tolerant (or
failing ?), it might not like them.
But I'd like
Hi!
For a while we thought our scanner was broken: it only scanned part of
the page.
After taking a closer look it turned out a region was selected in the
'preview' window - however, as we typically don't have the preview
window open (and just scan entire pages), we didn't notice.
This was a
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Sun, 2008-06-29 20:22:23 +0200, litlle girl little.linux.girl at
gmail.com wrote:
flatbed scanners are scanning moving head forward,
there in no reason to loose time on moving head backward useles,
next page can be scanned at head backward move,
and then fliped
we dont produce xsane, and it's author is no longer on this list. i
suggest you contact him directly. see the help menu...
allan
On 6/30/08, Arnout Engelen sane at bzzt.net wrote:
Hi!
For a while we thought our scanner was broken: it only scanned part of
the page.
After taking a closer
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:20:12AM -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
we dont produce xsane, and it's author is no longer on this list. i
suggest you contact him directly. see the help menu...
Oh, sorry for the noise, I'll ask him to update
http://www.xsane.org/xsane-mailinglist.html while i'm at it.
