Hello Community,
I'm a owner of the HP G4010 Scanner and i want to help you to program a
backend for the HP G4010 Photo Scanner.
I have the Specifications for the GL841, GL842 and GL843 chip.
My question is there someone who want to collaborate with me?
Has someone just written some listings
Hi Pierre,
Thanks very much for your great work. Definitely I will try to look at it.
I was looking at your code before. But, I didn't make it, to adapt it
to those genesys scanner.
Thanks!
Best,
Dio
On 1/17/09, Pierre Willenbrock pierre at pirsoft.dnsalias.org wrote:
Dhi Aurrahman schrieb:
Chris Bagwell chris at cnpbagwell.com wrote:
Hi,
I've not seen this discussed in mailing list archive. Is there any past
discussions?
We leave autotools files in CVS because:
- it's a pain to regenerate them
- developers don't always know autofoo
- distributions ship broken version of
Vladimir Koutny vlado at sane.ksp.sk wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
I already have a stand-alone app which can scan any area, in any
resolution and any color mode. Some things are not solved yet (ie it
just dumps raw data without any headers), but it generally works.
What's the state of your driver so
There is possibility that some of Samsung MFP devices could work with
xerox_mfp backend.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:57:36AM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Vladimir Koutny vlado at sane.ksp.sk wrote:
I already have a stand-alone app which can scan any area, in any
resolution and any color
Simon Matter simon.matter at invoca.ch wrote:
Hi,
Updated patch is attached, hope that's less confusing now.
Applied, thanks.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE http://www.jblache.org
jb at jblache.org GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
Chris Bagwell chris at cnpbagwell.com wrote:
* Autotools not required, as long as developer is not modifying configure.in
While speaking of configure.in... it could use a good cleanup as
you've probably seen, and while doing so it could also avoid testing
for freebsd/beos/osx things when
ABC abc at telekom.ru wrote:
There is possibility that some of Samsung MFP devices could work with
xerox_mfp backend.
That'd be great. I have a Dell 1815dn MFP that's just a rebadged
Samsung, and I'd be more than happy to get rid of the proprietary
backend crap that keeps locking up the device
Looking inside of Xerox Phaser 3200MFP I see such chips
that may help to identify compatible devices:
Samsung CHORUSm - ARM processor.
SCX-4725F/XRH V1.15(LF) - Samsung multifunction.
ISP1582BS - Philips USB controller.
Probably need to add chip detection to sane-find-scanner.
On Sat, Jan 17,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Chris Bagwell chris at cnpbagwell.com wrote:
That is probably the problem now that you mention it... I just looked at
tracker and their is a patch that seems incomplete.
I could probably get it working but I have an issue to resolve first. I'm
running a newer
roland- search the mailing list and the the bug tracker. this
particular model comes up occasionally.
allan
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Roland Graf roland.graf at alice.it wrote:
Hello Community,
I'm a owner of the HP G4010 Scanner and i want to help you to program a
backend for the HP
-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20090117/fb3fd701/attachment-0001.htm
$ scanimage -T
and send back the content of the console.
Nicolas
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20090117/254fd592/attachment.htm
This Multifunction scanner should be candidate to be handled by the
pixma backend, where it is declared.
In order to check what's going on, could you run scanimage as follows:
$ export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=10
$ scanimage -T
and send back the content of the console.
Nicolas
Le samedi 17 janvier
[pixma] BUG:Unmapped SANE Status code 5
Something happens during the usb transaction, probably in
sanei_usb_read_bulk() , here (seems like no data is read from scanner):
if (read_size == 0)
{
DBG (3, sanei_usb_read_bulk: read returned EOF\n);
*size = 0;
== return
On 1/17/2009 7:54 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Chris Bagwellchris at cnpbagwell.com
wrote:
That is probably the problem now that you mention it... I just looked at
tracker and their is a patch that seems incomplete.
I could probably get it working but I
On 1/17/2009 3:20 AM, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Chris Bagwellchris at cnpbagwell.com wrote:
Hi,
I've not seen this discussed in mailing list archive. Is there any past
discussions?
We leave autotools files in CVS because:
- it's a pain to regenerate them
- developers don't
On 1/17/2009 4:21 AM, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Chris Bagwellchris at cnpbagwell.com wrote:
* Autotools not required, as long as developer is not modifying configure.in
While speaking of configure.in... it could use a good cleanup as
you've probably seen, and while doing so it could
18 matches
Mail list logo
