Johannes Meixner wrote:
As far as I understand udev (and HAL and how all this stuff is
called nowadays) it seems you are wrong when you think it is
the distros which introduce all this never ending mess
of incompatible changes.
From my point of view it was the distros that kept changing.
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:16:37 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
Looks like the epson2 backend does not take full advantage of the
extended commands.
mm...which command has this resolution list?
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino,
Julien BLACHE wrote:
However, when it comes to udev rules, care must be taken with the LABELs
inside the rules file. The LABELs must not be repeated from one file to
another; failing that, chaos will ensue. (that may make a machine
unbootable until all duplicate LABELs are removed ... been
OK, so this thread has sort of exploded.
So the idea so far, is that we want to install the udev/HAL rules generation
tool (with some possible modifications) along with all the .desc files.
We also need to provide some standard location for third parties to place their
.desc files, because the
m. allan noah wrote:
uhg- I don't like that idea. I think it should be possible to place
these third-party rules files someplace that they won't get wiped out
by a sane-backends upgrade, rather than having to append some magic
someplace to call a script.
Ah, good point. But the rules will need
Hello,
On Nov 18 09:20 Alesh Slovak wrote (shortened):
But like I said, I really don't care who is the cause
of this problem, I just want to see if we can fix it somehow.
If you don't care who is the cause of this problem,
you cannot fix the problem and actually your proposal
does not fix the
Hello,
On Nov 17 18:53 Julien BLACHE wrote (shortened):
Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de wrote:
That was a change in the USB layer in the kernel that needed a
new/modified udev rule to create the device nodes.
Perhaps you misunderstood me.
I meant it as an example to show which awkward
Hi All,
i'm trying to work GT-S620(Perfection V30) on ARM netbook(Sharp Netwalker).
I tried Image Scan and Epson2 driver, but I can't work it.
I want to work it for my scanner camera. is there any ideas or suggestions?
Regards,
Ryosuke Kojima
--
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/spyuge/
The epkowa driver supports this scanner, but uses a precompiled binary
module which is only availible for x86, IIRC. Unfortunately, this
machine seems to use a different protocol from other Epson machines,
and is not supported by epson or epson2 drivers. The epjitsu driver
could perhaps be
Hi!
as first, i am really sorry for my poor english (oder deutsch), but i
hope that you understand.
Well, this is my problem: I can't resize the main xsane window,
histogram window, standard options window and advanced options window.
This makes some numeric sizes (e.g. in avanced options window)
Alesh Slovak alesh.slovak at avasys.jp wrote:
Hi,
Ah, good point. But the rules will need to be regenerated when a SANE
upgrade contains changes to the generation tool, which means the third
party .desc files from which the rules are generated need to be
someplace where SANE can find them.
Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de wrote:
Hi,
the syscall interface for udev is not stable
which is udev's fault,
I'm not sure netlink qualifies as a syscall interface, so it may very
well escape Greg KH's law of stable APIs.
*g*
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE
The syscall interface is how applications request kernel services. It is
not a general mechanism for the kernel to start userspace applications.
HAL and udev are mechanisms intended to give the kernel a flexible way to
invoke userspace applications when events such as hardware device
connection
Hi guys,
Any chance we could work this out?
Thanks!
Adrian
Ady Deac wrote:
Hi all,
Any chance we can get this to work? The scanner is working with SANE,
but I can only scan 1/4 (top left corner) of the whole A4 document. I
know I have used it before - I guess about 1 or 2 years, and was
Hi guys,
Any chance we could work this out?
Thanks!
Adrian
Ady Deac wrote:
Hi all,
Any chance we can get this to work? The scanner is working with SANE,
but I can only scan 1/4 (top left corner) of the whole A4 document. I
know I have used it before - I guess about 1 or 2 years, and was
So from what I read, it's fake ? bad news !!!
Y P
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 05:52:44PM -0800, yudie wrote:
Aunur wrote:
Dear All,
I also experienced the same problem in installing Canoscan LIDE 100 on
linux system (ubuntu), so we also offer a donation to the community as a
16 matches
Mail list logo
