[sane-devel] libusb + epkowa prob

2010-01-29 Thread Alesh Slovak
C L. wrote: Already got the epkowa and related stuff installed. Debug does't provide more clues either other than show the libs being loaded then closed. The only clue I've seen so far is that Inappropriate ioctl error in my strace log. What's really annoying, I had this epson v10 working

[sane-devel] libusb + epkowa prob

2010-01-29 Thread Alesh Slovak
C L. wrote: Bingo!!! Now it's working! At least as root (I should be able to sort that out, need to edit the /etc/udev/rules/libsane.rules.) I didn't come across any documentation mentioning that interpreter line. That's the secret ingredient I was missing =) There likely is none. Our

[sane-devel] libusb + epkowa prob

2010-01-29 Thread Alesh Slovak
C L. wrote: Hey btw, how do you compile iscan to enable debug in epkowa? I don't get anything from 'SANE_DEBUG_EPKOWA=255' - only more verbosity in 'SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255' epkowa no longer uses integer values for the debug level. It has the following levels in increasing level of feedback:

[sane-devel] Xerox Travel Scanner 100 could not be detected

2010-01-29 Thread stef
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 11:34:55 Andrey Loginov, vous avez ?crit : Hello Please check changed genesys_device.c in attachment. And also the scan with scan area changed. And there are some other staff to do (like scan button and page feed sensor). How can we proceed with this staff? ? ??,

[sane-devel] Push to TOP: Xerox Phaser 6180MFP / Which Protocol is used ? See USBSnoop.log

2010-01-29 Thread stef
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 23:32:51 Dipl.Geogr.G.Birkenfeld, vous avez ?crit : So, nobody an idea about creating/suggesting a SANE driver for this one ? Thanx Hello, the first step would be to identify the chips in your scanner. Maybe by disassembling your scanner. But

[sane-devel] Has anyone managed to get Snapscan backend working with FreeBSD 8.0 (which uses libusb)?

2010-01-29 Thread m. allan noah
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Oliver Schwartz Oliver.Schwartz at gmx.de wrote: Hi all, On 28.01.2010 at 14:39 m. allan noah wrote: I would do both- process ID combined with a hash of the device name, I believe that would defeat the purpose. The whole point of the mutex is to protect

[sane-devel] Has anyone managed to get Snapscan backend working with FreeBSD 8.0 (which uses libusb)?

2010-01-29 Thread Oliver Schwartz
Hi Allan, Anyway, I've commited a hash function now. The new code should also work on FreeBSD 8.0. If anyone can try it, I'd be much obliged. I did not see any commit message. did you git push? Err - yes, and it told me that it had pushed 4 or 5 objects. That was my first git

[sane-devel] Xerox Travel Scanner 100 could not be detected

2010-01-29 Thread Andrey Loginov
/attachments/20100129/5930e80f/attachment-0001.c