On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:19 AM,
ralph.gauges at bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
Hi,
I recently bought a new multifunction device from Canon (MG8150) and as
usually there are no linux drivers for the device from the manufacturer.
So the question now is, how could I be of help to eventually
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:41 AM,
ralph.gauges at bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
I tried to use the device over ethernet and this seems to work better:
Quoting Gernot Hassenpflug aikishugyo at gmail.com:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:19 AM,
ralph.gauges at bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
Now
Hello,
If you double checked the X74 is rts8852 based, you can send patches to
the mailing list for the lexmark backend.
How can i make sure ?
I've had some very promising results. I was able to get scans at 75dpi
greyscale and colour. So I guess that means it is rts8852 based. Right?
I had
Hello,
I have just pushed a new revision of the genesys backend (build 41)
that
raises the default gamma of LiDE 100/200 to 1.7 instead of 1.0. It would be
nice if you could test this version (now available in the git source tree) to
see how it improves the image darkness
Le Monday 01 November 2010 00:49:58 Torsten Houwaart, vous avez ?crit :
Hello,
If you double checked the X74 is rts8852 based, you can send patches to
the mailing list for the lexmark backend.
How can i make sure ?
I've had some very promising results. I was able to get scans at 75dpi
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Ralph Gauges
ralph.gauges at bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
Hi Gernot,
I did what you suggested and I do have a log file with debug output which is
rather long.
Should I really send this to the list? And if yes, should I add the log file
as an attachment or
I disagree with this commit. Perhaps we need to change what is
printed, but I don't think we should hide them.
allan
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:34 AM, St?phane Voltz stef.dev at free.fr wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit
Hello,
I tried to change quality of a PDF document with the following command line
erwan at PC1:~/LotissementChenaie$ gs -q -dSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -
sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dPDFSETTINGS=/printer -sOUTPUTFILE=NewDocName.pdf -f
DocName.pdf
My OS is Debian Squeeze.
I got the following result:
Le Monday 01 November 2010 12:47:27 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
I disagree with this commit. Perhaps we need to change what is
printed, but I don't think we should hide them.
allan
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:34 AM, St?phane Voltz stef.dev at free.fr wrote:
The following commit has
E. MARC e.marc at orange.fr wrote:
My OS is Debian Squeeze.
XSane 0.994
That's not the version of XSane shipping in Squeeze.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE http://www.jblache.org
jb at jblache.org GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:05 AM, stef stef.dev at free.fr wrote:
Le Monday 01 November 2010 12:47:27 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
I disagree with this commit. Perhaps we need to change what is
printed, but I don't think we should hide them.
allan
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:34 AM, St?phane
Le Monday 01 November 2010 14:51:59 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
We need a way for authors of button handling programs to figure out
what sensors a scanner exposes. Yes, they can use libsane to query the
options, but then a third user would have to install the button
daemon, just to find
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:45 AM, stef stef.dev at free.fr wrote:
Le Monday 01 November 2010 14:51:59 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
We need a way for authors of button handling programs to figure out
what sensors a scanner exposes. Yes, they can use libsane to query the
options, but then a
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:41 +0100,
ralph.gauges at bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
I tried to use the device over ethernet and this seems to work better:
Then you probably have a mistake in the usb-id. The bjnp code looks up
the device name and fetches the USB-id from the name. As long as
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:51 +0100,
You can try adding the definitions near the end of pixma_mp150.c where
similar definitions exist, like this:
/* Latest devices (2010) Generation 4 CIS/CCD */
DEVICE (Canon PIXMA MP280, MP280, MP280_PID, 1200, 638, 877,
PIXMA_CAP_CIS),
: 3787 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20101101/f3eeabac/attachment.bin
I've not had a chance to look at the code, but i can say that this
design is preferred over a new argument to the open() function,
because some scanner might someday require communication with two
endpoints of the same type concurrently.
Also, sanei is 'internal' to sane. The interface is not
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Olaf Meeuwissen
olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010?11?01? 23:45, stef wrote:
Le Monday 01 November 2010 14:51:59 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
We need a way for authors of button handling programs to
?- Why would a button handling program need a button daemon to find out
if there are any sensors when using libsane if scanimage can do the same
thing using libsane without that button daemon?
It does not- but as I said above- the third party end user might like
to know if his scanner
19 matches
Mail list logo
