at lists.alioth.debian.org
--
The truth is an offense, but not a sin
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20110408/722751e4/attachment-0001.htm
Hello,
On Apr 7 21:08 postbote2009-debian at yahoo.com wrote (excerpt):
Julien BLACHE wrote (excerpt):
postbote2009-debian at yahoo.com wrote (excerpt):
device `pixma:04A91725' is a CANON Canon PIXMA MP610 multi-function
peripheral
Seeing how your device is an MFP, it's probably root:lp
-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
--
The truth is an offense, but not a sin
--
The truth is an offense, but not a sin
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20110408/081564d9
postbote2009-debian at yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I?m just curious - if you?ve got the time and it isn?t too difficult to
explain
- why has the user to be in the group lp if in 60-libsane.rules scanner
is
mentioned?
It's due to changes in udev and in the default rules shipped with udev.
But
Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de wrote:
Hi,
All GROUP=scanner are replaced by GROUP=lp.
You do *not* want to do that on a multiuser system. If the reason is not
obvious to the reader, I suggest the reader step away from any root
account she may hold.
[6 paragraphs]
A drawback when using
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=7t=54246start=15
Also, SANE 1.0.22 is ready to be released, so the git repository for
1.0.23 should soon be ready. Then we can start the process of sending
diffs for the new sub-driver incorporating the support for the 9000F,
8800F, MP960 and MP810
The
