mf8030
or mf4010.
Would you be so kind and hint out some documentation related to the process
of reverse-engineering of these devices?
V.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/2030/9bfbcc3b
to the
process of reverse-engineering of these devices?
V.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/2030/04c4566e/attachment.html
On 11/30/2011 04:53 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
Are you sure you are really running your modified version of the
backend? have you enabled debugging at runtime?
I use prefix in ./configure and then in the folder I install it i run
./scanimage so I should be using my modified version as far as I
SANE_DEBUG_EPSON2=255 scanimage [args here] 2tpu.log
then look in tpu.log
allan
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Martin Zackrisson
martin.zackrisson at cmb.gu.se wrote:
On 11/30/2011 04:53 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
Are you sure you are really running your modified version of the
backend?
Hi!
I have a Canon MF8330 multifunctional device..
Initially, sane-find-scanner reported:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon,Inc.], product=0x2708
[MF8330]) at libusb:001:010
But sane didn't support it, so scanimage didn't work.
I noticed that pixma_imageclass.c has (untested) support for
This machine uses a new command 'e5' instead of the traditional 'd5'
command used by older canon dr machines. The contents of these
commands are unknown. So, I need you to make some more logs in
windows. You will need to change one setting, make a scan, save the
log, clear the log, and change the
