Am Montag, 17. April 2006 12:18 schrieb Frank Zago:
Before changing the code, set SANE_DEBUG_MICROTEK to 128 (type export
SANE_DEBUG_MICROTEK=128 under your shell) and redo your test. That will
give more information.
In particular get_scan_status() doesn't seems to return the correct
Am Montag, 17. April 2006 19:39 schrieb Matto Marjanovic:
thank you Matto, for taking your time, too!
From: Daniel Bauer li...@daniel-bauer.com
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:08:06 +0200
...
I've added the above in microtek.c and compiled again. Now there's much
more output (all done
Am Montag, 17. April 2006 20:53 schrieb Daniel Bauer:
Sorry if I'm completely wrong. I'm just trying to learn and understand...
Huu - I *am* completely wrong! And I am really embarrassed... I just now read
the comments in the program and saw your name there, Matto.
I feel really stupid
Am Sonntag, 16. April 2006 13:11 schrieb Frank Zago:
Hello Daniel,
Hi Frank
thanks for looking at my problem!
As indicated by the trace you provided, the crash happenned at line 4017
in microtek.c:
s-max_scsi_lines = SCSI_BUFF_SIZE / (s-pixel_bpl + s-header_bpl);
I now get a first idea
Am Sonntag, 16. April 2006 16:17 schrieb Frank Zago:
thanks Frank, for your advice
First you have to uninstall sane-backend. Something such as rpm -e
--nodeps sane-backends should do.
it seems (to me) that on SUSE 10.0 things are named a bit different???:
which sane-backends gave nothing, so
Am Sonntag, 16. April 2006 16:17 schrieb Frank Zago:
...
You should then be able to do the same (failing) test again and get the
same results.
not exactly, the differences are:
- the scanner is not detected anymore from a user prompt now (I've read about
that somewhere and will search again
any more information about my computer or settings, please tell me
what you need (and if it's not obvious, pleasetell me where I can find the
necessary information...)
Thanks
Daniel
--
Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Switzerland
professional photography: http://www.daniel-bauer.com
special
